Tensile Bond Strength and SEM Evaluation of Caries-affected Dentin Using Dentin Adhesives

M. Nakajima, H. Sano, M. F. Burrow, J. Tagami, M. Yoshiyama, S. Ebisu, B. Ciucchi, C. M. Russell, D. H. Pashley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

258 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Tensile bond strength measurements are commonly used for the evaluation of dentin adhesive systems. Most tests are performed using extracted non-carious human or bovine dentin. However, the adhesion of resins to caries-affected dentin is still unclear. The objectives of this study were to test the hypothesis that bonding to caries-affected dentin is inferior to bonding to normal dentin, and that the quality of the hybrid layer plays a major role in creating good adhesion. We used a micro-tensile bond strength test to compare test bond strengths made to either caries-affected dentin or normal dentin, using three commercial adhesive systems (All Bond 2, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, and Clearfil Liner Bond II). For scanning electron microscopy, the polished interfaces between the adhesive bond and dentin were subjected to brief exposure to 10% phosphoric acid solution and 5% sodium hypochlorite, so that the quality of the hybrid layers could be observed. Bonding to normal dentin with either All Bond 2 (26.9 ± 8.8 MPa) or Clearfil Liner Bond II (29.5 ± 10.9 MPa) showed tensile bond strengths higher than those to caries-affected dentin (13.0 ± 3.6 MPa and 14.0 ± 4.3 MPa, respectively). The tensile bond strengths obtained with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose were similar in normal and caries-affected dentin (20.3 ± 5.5 MPa and 18.5 ± 4.0 MPa, respectively). The hybrid layers created by All Bond 2 in normal dentin and by Clearfil Liner Bond II in normal or caries-affected dentin showed phosphoric acid and sodium hypochlorite resistance, whereas the hybrid layers created by All Bond 2 in caries-affected dentin and those created by Scotchbond Multi-Purpose to normal and caries-affected dentin showed partial susceptibility to the acid and sodium hypochlorite treatment. The results indicate that the strength of adhesion to dentin depends upon both the adhesive system used and the type of dentin. Moreover, the quality of the hybrid layer may not always contribute significantly to tensile bond strength.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1679-1688
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Dental Research
Volume74
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

Tensile Strength
Dentin
Adhesives
Sodium Hypochlorite

Keywords

  • caries
  • dentin
  • dentin bonding
  • resins
  • sclerotic dentin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Nakajima, M., Sano, H., Burrow, M. F., Tagami, J., Yoshiyama, M., Ebisu, S., ... Pashley, D. H. (1995). Tensile Bond Strength and SEM Evaluation of Caries-affected Dentin Using Dentin Adhesives. Journal of Dental Research, 74(10), 1679-1688. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740100901

Tensile Bond Strength and SEM Evaluation of Caries-affected Dentin Using Dentin Adhesives. / Nakajima, M.; Sano, H.; Burrow, M. F.; Tagami, J.; Yoshiyama, M.; Ebisu, S.; Ciucchi, B.; Russell, C. M.; Pashley, D. H.

In: Journal of Dental Research, Vol. 74, No. 10, 01.01.1995, p. 1679-1688.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nakajima, M, Sano, H, Burrow, MF, Tagami, J, Yoshiyama, M, Ebisu, S, Ciucchi, B, Russell, CM & Pashley, DH 1995, 'Tensile Bond Strength and SEM Evaluation of Caries-affected Dentin Using Dentin Adhesives', Journal of Dental Research, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 1679-1688. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740100901
Nakajima, M. ; Sano, H. ; Burrow, M. F. ; Tagami, J. ; Yoshiyama, M. ; Ebisu, S. ; Ciucchi, B. ; Russell, C. M. ; Pashley, D. H. / Tensile Bond Strength and SEM Evaluation of Caries-affected Dentin Using Dentin Adhesives. In: Journal of Dental Research. 1995 ; Vol. 74, No. 10. pp. 1679-1688.
@article{981e0f39b0f94c1e9efbfdd21837a301,
title = "Tensile Bond Strength and SEM Evaluation of Caries-affected Dentin Using Dentin Adhesives",
abstract = "Tensile bond strength measurements are commonly used for the evaluation of dentin adhesive systems. Most tests are performed using extracted non-carious human or bovine dentin. However, the adhesion of resins to caries-affected dentin is still unclear. The objectives of this study were to test the hypothesis that bonding to caries-affected dentin is inferior to bonding to normal dentin, and that the quality of the hybrid layer plays a major role in creating good adhesion. We used a micro-tensile bond strength test to compare test bond strengths made to either caries-affected dentin or normal dentin, using three commercial adhesive systems (All Bond 2, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, and Clearfil Liner Bond II). For scanning electron microscopy, the polished interfaces between the adhesive bond and dentin were subjected to brief exposure to 10{\%} phosphoric acid solution and 5{\%} sodium hypochlorite, so that the quality of the hybrid layers could be observed. Bonding to normal dentin with either All Bond 2 (26.9 ± 8.8 MPa) or Clearfil Liner Bond II (29.5 ± 10.9 MPa) showed tensile bond strengths higher than those to caries-affected dentin (13.0 ± 3.6 MPa and 14.0 ± 4.3 MPa, respectively). The tensile bond strengths obtained with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose were similar in normal and caries-affected dentin (20.3 ± 5.5 MPa and 18.5 ± 4.0 MPa, respectively). The hybrid layers created by All Bond 2 in normal dentin and by Clearfil Liner Bond II in normal or caries-affected dentin showed phosphoric acid and sodium hypochlorite resistance, whereas the hybrid layers created by All Bond 2 in caries-affected dentin and those created by Scotchbond Multi-Purpose to normal and caries-affected dentin showed partial susceptibility to the acid and sodium hypochlorite treatment. The results indicate that the strength of adhesion to dentin depends upon both the adhesive system used and the type of dentin. Moreover, the quality of the hybrid layer may not always contribute significantly to tensile bond strength.",
keywords = "caries, dentin, dentin bonding, resins, sclerotic dentin",
author = "M. Nakajima and H. Sano and Burrow, {M. F.} and J. Tagami and M. Yoshiyama and S. Ebisu and B. Ciucchi and Russell, {C. M.} and Pashley, {D. H.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/00220345950740100901",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "1679--1688",
journal = "Journal of Dental Research",
issn = "0022-0345",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tensile Bond Strength and SEM Evaluation of Caries-affected Dentin Using Dentin Adhesives

AU - Nakajima, M.

AU - Sano, H.

AU - Burrow, M. F.

AU - Tagami, J.

AU - Yoshiyama, M.

AU - Ebisu, S.

AU - Ciucchi, B.

AU - Russell, C. M.

AU - Pashley, D. H.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - Tensile bond strength measurements are commonly used for the evaluation of dentin adhesive systems. Most tests are performed using extracted non-carious human or bovine dentin. However, the adhesion of resins to caries-affected dentin is still unclear. The objectives of this study were to test the hypothesis that bonding to caries-affected dentin is inferior to bonding to normal dentin, and that the quality of the hybrid layer plays a major role in creating good adhesion. We used a micro-tensile bond strength test to compare test bond strengths made to either caries-affected dentin or normal dentin, using three commercial adhesive systems (All Bond 2, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, and Clearfil Liner Bond II). For scanning electron microscopy, the polished interfaces between the adhesive bond and dentin were subjected to brief exposure to 10% phosphoric acid solution and 5% sodium hypochlorite, so that the quality of the hybrid layers could be observed. Bonding to normal dentin with either All Bond 2 (26.9 ± 8.8 MPa) or Clearfil Liner Bond II (29.5 ± 10.9 MPa) showed tensile bond strengths higher than those to caries-affected dentin (13.0 ± 3.6 MPa and 14.0 ± 4.3 MPa, respectively). The tensile bond strengths obtained with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose were similar in normal and caries-affected dentin (20.3 ± 5.5 MPa and 18.5 ± 4.0 MPa, respectively). The hybrid layers created by All Bond 2 in normal dentin and by Clearfil Liner Bond II in normal or caries-affected dentin showed phosphoric acid and sodium hypochlorite resistance, whereas the hybrid layers created by All Bond 2 in caries-affected dentin and those created by Scotchbond Multi-Purpose to normal and caries-affected dentin showed partial susceptibility to the acid and sodium hypochlorite treatment. The results indicate that the strength of adhesion to dentin depends upon both the adhesive system used and the type of dentin. Moreover, the quality of the hybrid layer may not always contribute significantly to tensile bond strength.

AB - Tensile bond strength measurements are commonly used for the evaluation of dentin adhesive systems. Most tests are performed using extracted non-carious human or bovine dentin. However, the adhesion of resins to caries-affected dentin is still unclear. The objectives of this study were to test the hypothesis that bonding to caries-affected dentin is inferior to bonding to normal dentin, and that the quality of the hybrid layer plays a major role in creating good adhesion. We used a micro-tensile bond strength test to compare test bond strengths made to either caries-affected dentin or normal dentin, using three commercial adhesive systems (All Bond 2, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, and Clearfil Liner Bond II). For scanning electron microscopy, the polished interfaces between the adhesive bond and dentin were subjected to brief exposure to 10% phosphoric acid solution and 5% sodium hypochlorite, so that the quality of the hybrid layers could be observed. Bonding to normal dentin with either All Bond 2 (26.9 ± 8.8 MPa) or Clearfil Liner Bond II (29.5 ± 10.9 MPa) showed tensile bond strengths higher than those to caries-affected dentin (13.0 ± 3.6 MPa and 14.0 ± 4.3 MPa, respectively). The tensile bond strengths obtained with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose were similar in normal and caries-affected dentin (20.3 ± 5.5 MPa and 18.5 ± 4.0 MPa, respectively). The hybrid layers created by All Bond 2 in normal dentin and by Clearfil Liner Bond II in normal or caries-affected dentin showed phosphoric acid and sodium hypochlorite resistance, whereas the hybrid layers created by All Bond 2 in caries-affected dentin and those created by Scotchbond Multi-Purpose to normal and caries-affected dentin showed partial susceptibility to the acid and sodium hypochlorite treatment. The results indicate that the strength of adhesion to dentin depends upon both the adhesive system used and the type of dentin. Moreover, the quality of the hybrid layer may not always contribute significantly to tensile bond strength.

KW - caries

KW - dentin

KW - dentin bonding

KW - resins

KW - sclerotic dentin

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029383077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029383077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/00220345950740100901

DO - 10.1177/00220345950740100901

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 1679

EP - 1688

JO - Journal of Dental Research

JF - Journal of Dental Research

SN - 0022-0345

IS - 10

ER -