The Abortion Attitudes Paradox

Model Specification and Gender Differences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rather unexpectedly, prior work has failed to find consistent gender differences in public support for legal abortion. Given that gender differences in public opinion emerge for a wide range of other issue areas, it seems paradoxical that there is no consistent gender difference on the issue of abortion. I propose that this failure to find a consistent gender difference is due to how abortion attitudes are modeled. Controlling for religiosity, which research has shown women to score higher on, results in a small and consistent gender gap in support for legal abortion with women more likely than men to support.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-42
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Women, Politics and Policy
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2015

Fingerprint

abortion
gender-specific factors
legal abortion
public support
public opinion
gender

Keywords

  • abortion attitudes
  • gender gap
  • religiosity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The Abortion Attitudes Paradox : Model Specification and Gender Differences. / Lizotte, Mary-Kate.

In: Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, Vol. 36, No. 1, 02.01.2015, p. 22-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aa7d201dc1874567a10d8a310ecc06bd,
title = "The Abortion Attitudes Paradox: Model Specification and Gender Differences",
abstract = "Rather unexpectedly, prior work has failed to find consistent gender differences in public support for legal abortion. Given that gender differences in public opinion emerge for a wide range of other issue areas, it seems paradoxical that there is no consistent gender difference on the issue of abortion. I propose that this failure to find a consistent gender difference is due to how abortion attitudes are modeled. Controlling for religiosity, which research has shown women to score higher on, results in a small and consistent gender gap in support for legal abortion with women more likely than men to support.",
keywords = "abortion attitudes, gender gap, religiosity",
author = "Mary-Kate Lizotte",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/1554477X.2015.985151",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "22--42",
journal = "Journal of Women, Politics and Policy",
issn = "1554-477X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Abortion Attitudes Paradox

T2 - Model Specification and Gender Differences

AU - Lizotte, Mary-Kate

PY - 2015/1/2

Y1 - 2015/1/2

N2 - Rather unexpectedly, prior work has failed to find consistent gender differences in public support for legal abortion. Given that gender differences in public opinion emerge for a wide range of other issue areas, it seems paradoxical that there is no consistent gender difference on the issue of abortion. I propose that this failure to find a consistent gender difference is due to how abortion attitudes are modeled. Controlling for religiosity, which research has shown women to score higher on, results in a small and consistent gender gap in support for legal abortion with women more likely than men to support.

AB - Rather unexpectedly, prior work has failed to find consistent gender differences in public support for legal abortion. Given that gender differences in public opinion emerge for a wide range of other issue areas, it seems paradoxical that there is no consistent gender difference on the issue of abortion. I propose that this failure to find a consistent gender difference is due to how abortion attitudes are modeled. Controlling for religiosity, which research has shown women to score higher on, results in a small and consistent gender gap in support for legal abortion with women more likely than men to support.

KW - abortion attitudes

KW - gender gap

KW - religiosity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922384498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922384498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1554477X.2015.985151

DO - 10.1080/1554477X.2015.985151

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 22

EP - 42

JO - Journal of Women, Politics and Policy

JF - Journal of Women, Politics and Policy

SN - 1554-477X

IS - 1

ER -