The Abortion Attitudes Paradox: Model Specification and Gender Differences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rather unexpectedly, prior work has failed to find consistent gender differences in public support for legal abortion. Given that gender differences in public opinion emerge for a wide range of other issue areas, it seems paradoxical that there is no consistent gender difference on the issue of abortion. I propose that this failure to find a consistent gender difference is due to how abortion attitudes are modeled. Controlling for religiosity, which research has shown women to score higher on, results in a small and consistent gender gap in support for legal abortion with women more likely than men to support.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-42
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Women, Politics and Policy
Volume36
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • abortion attitudes
  • gender gap
  • religiosity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Abortion Attitudes Paradox: Model Specification and Gender Differences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this