The accuracy of portable ultrasonography to diagnose fractures in an austere environment

Christopher R. McNeil, John G. McManus, Sumeru Mehta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Previous literature has shown the ability of ultrasonography technology to accurately assess orthopedic pathology. Over the past two decades, the use of ultrasound in the prehospital setting has become an important tool for triage, diagnosis, and treatment, especially in austere and remote environments that lack appropriate radiography capability and logistical support. The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of ultrasound in the austere, combat environment for diagnosis of orthopedic fracture. Methods. We conducted a longitudinal, prospective, observational study on patients presenting with suspected closed fractures using a digital handheld ultrasound device. All patients presenting with suspected fracture underwent an ultrasound examination by a board-certified emergency medicine physician credentialed in emergency ultrasonography. Patients were then categorized into ultrasound-positive and ultrasound-negative groups. Results. A total of 44 subjects underwent ultrasound examination for suspected fractures. There were initially 12 (27%) positive and 32 (73%) negative scans. Of the initial 12 positive scans, ten had a true fracture verified by plain radiography. Ultrasonography yielded an overall sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 94%. Only four patients with an initial negative ultrasound scan continued to have clinical symptoms for more than three days and were found to have no evidence of fracture by radiograph. Conclusions. Our data show that use of ultrasound by an experienced clinician in the austere environment can be performed accurately and can possibly prevent unnecessary evacuations for suspected fractures requiring radiographic verification. The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of ultrasound examination in the austere, combat environment for diagnosis of orthopedic fracture.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)50-52
Number of pages3
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ultrasonography
Orthopedics
Radiography
Closed Fractures
Emergency Medicine
Triage
Observational Studies
Emergencies
Prospective Studies
Pathology
Technology
Physicians
Equipment and Supplies
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Austere environment
  • Combat medicine
  • Fracture
  • Orthopedic
  • Postreduction
  • Realignment
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Emergency

Cite this

The accuracy of portable ultrasonography to diagnose fractures in an austere environment. / McNeil, Christopher R.; McManus, John G.; Mehta, Sumeru.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.01.2009, p. 50-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9208331a7c2b4c43b5654eb723998aae,
title = "The accuracy of portable ultrasonography to diagnose fractures in an austere environment",
abstract = "Background. Previous literature has shown the ability of ultrasonography technology to accurately assess orthopedic pathology. Over the past two decades, the use of ultrasound in the prehospital setting has become an important tool for triage, diagnosis, and treatment, especially in austere and remote environments that lack appropriate radiography capability and logistical support. The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of ultrasound in the austere, combat environment for diagnosis of orthopedic fracture. Methods. We conducted a longitudinal, prospective, observational study on patients presenting with suspected closed fractures using a digital handheld ultrasound device. All patients presenting with suspected fracture underwent an ultrasound examination by a board-certified emergency medicine physician credentialed in emergency ultrasonography. Patients were then categorized into ultrasound-positive and ultrasound-negative groups. Results. A total of 44 subjects underwent ultrasound examination for suspected fractures. There were initially 12 (27{\%}) positive and 32 (73{\%}) negative scans. Of the initial 12 positive scans, ten had a true fracture verified by plain radiography. Ultrasonography yielded an overall sensitivity of 100{\%} and a specificity of 94{\%}. Only four patients with an initial negative ultrasound scan continued to have clinical symptoms for more than three days and were found to have no evidence of fracture by radiograph. Conclusions. Our data show that use of ultrasound by an experienced clinician in the austere environment can be performed accurately and can possibly prevent unnecessary evacuations for suspected fractures requiring radiographic verification. The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of ultrasound examination in the austere, combat environment for diagnosis of orthopedic fracture.",
keywords = "Austere environment, Combat medicine, Fracture, Orthopedic, Postreduction, Realignment, Ultrasound",
author = "McNeil, {Christopher R.} and McManus, {John G.} and Sumeru Mehta",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10903120802474513",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "50--52",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The accuracy of portable ultrasonography to diagnose fractures in an austere environment

AU - McNeil, Christopher R.

AU - McManus, John G.

AU - Mehta, Sumeru

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Background. Previous literature has shown the ability of ultrasonography technology to accurately assess orthopedic pathology. Over the past two decades, the use of ultrasound in the prehospital setting has become an important tool for triage, diagnosis, and treatment, especially in austere and remote environments that lack appropriate radiography capability and logistical support. The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of ultrasound in the austere, combat environment for diagnosis of orthopedic fracture. Methods. We conducted a longitudinal, prospective, observational study on patients presenting with suspected closed fractures using a digital handheld ultrasound device. All patients presenting with suspected fracture underwent an ultrasound examination by a board-certified emergency medicine physician credentialed in emergency ultrasonography. Patients were then categorized into ultrasound-positive and ultrasound-negative groups. Results. A total of 44 subjects underwent ultrasound examination for suspected fractures. There were initially 12 (27%) positive and 32 (73%) negative scans. Of the initial 12 positive scans, ten had a true fracture verified by plain radiography. Ultrasonography yielded an overall sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 94%. Only four patients with an initial negative ultrasound scan continued to have clinical symptoms for more than three days and were found to have no evidence of fracture by radiograph. Conclusions. Our data show that use of ultrasound by an experienced clinician in the austere environment can be performed accurately and can possibly prevent unnecessary evacuations for suspected fractures requiring radiographic verification. The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of ultrasound examination in the austere, combat environment for diagnosis of orthopedic fracture.

AB - Background. Previous literature has shown the ability of ultrasonography technology to accurately assess orthopedic pathology. Over the past two decades, the use of ultrasound in the prehospital setting has become an important tool for triage, diagnosis, and treatment, especially in austere and remote environments that lack appropriate radiography capability and logistical support. The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of ultrasound in the austere, combat environment for diagnosis of orthopedic fracture. Methods. We conducted a longitudinal, prospective, observational study on patients presenting with suspected closed fractures using a digital handheld ultrasound device. All patients presenting with suspected fracture underwent an ultrasound examination by a board-certified emergency medicine physician credentialed in emergency ultrasonography. Patients were then categorized into ultrasound-positive and ultrasound-negative groups. Results. A total of 44 subjects underwent ultrasound examination for suspected fractures. There were initially 12 (27%) positive and 32 (73%) negative scans. Of the initial 12 positive scans, ten had a true fracture verified by plain radiography. Ultrasonography yielded an overall sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 94%. Only four patients with an initial negative ultrasound scan continued to have clinical symptoms for more than three days and were found to have no evidence of fracture by radiograph. Conclusions. Our data show that use of ultrasound by an experienced clinician in the austere environment can be performed accurately and can possibly prevent unnecessary evacuations for suspected fractures requiring radiographic verification. The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of ultrasound examination in the austere, combat environment for diagnosis of orthopedic fracture.

KW - Austere environment

KW - Combat medicine

KW - Fracture

KW - Orthopedic

KW - Postreduction

KW - Realignment

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61649124901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61649124901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10903120802474513

DO - 10.1080/10903120802474513

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 50

EP - 52

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 1

ER -