The categorical generation of organizational inequality: A comparative test of Tilly's durable inequality

Donald Tomaskovic-Devey, Dustin R Avent-Holt, Catherine Zimmer, Sandra Harding

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper develops a theoretical and methodological application of Tilly's [Tilly, C. (1998). Durable inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press] assertions that inequalities are inherently relational and categorical. We focus on the specific proposition that inequalities are exaggerated when categorical social distinctions are mapped onto positional distinctions internal to organizations. Using samples of Australian and U.S. organizations we examine the influence of sex and other status distinctions upon between-class wage inequality. In both countries class inequality is exaggerated when workers are women and managers men. These between-class inequality producing processes are also present for other categorical distinctions available in the data we use (education, permanent vs. temporary worker, dominant vs. marginal linguistic group in Australia, permanent vs. temporary worker and white vs. non-white in the U.S.). In the U.S. the coefficients for relational sex composition are twice as large as in Australia, suggesting historical-institutional differences between the countries enables gender to exert a stronger influence on between-class inequality in the U.S. We further examine the institutional differences in these categorical bases for inequality by examining the extent to which they vary within the two countries as a function of two historically relevant institutional distinctions in wage setting regimes-formalization in the U.S. and centralized wage awards in Australia. As expected these institutional differences shape the extent and type of between-class wage inequality. We conclude that researchers should move methodologically towards observing relations within organizations to reflect the theoretical advances of the past two decades.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)128-142
Number of pages15
JournalResearch in Social Stratification and Mobility
Volume27
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2009

Fingerprint

wage
temporary worker
formalization
regime
manager
linguistics
worker
gender
education

Keywords

  • Australia
  • Education
  • Income inequality
  • Organizations
  • Race
  • Relational models
  • Sex
  • U.S.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

The categorical generation of organizational inequality : A comparative test of Tilly's durable inequality. / Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald; Avent-Holt, Dustin R; Zimmer, Catherine; Harding, Sandra.

In: Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Vol. 27, No. 3, 01.09.2009, p. 128-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{558c0f20ebed457194124db9e55cc824,
title = "The categorical generation of organizational inequality: A comparative test of Tilly's durable inequality",
abstract = "This paper develops a theoretical and methodological application of Tilly's [Tilly, C. (1998). Durable inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press] assertions that inequalities are inherently relational and categorical. We focus on the specific proposition that inequalities are exaggerated when categorical social distinctions are mapped onto positional distinctions internal to organizations. Using samples of Australian and U.S. organizations we examine the influence of sex and other status distinctions upon between-class wage inequality. In both countries class inequality is exaggerated when workers are women and managers men. These between-class inequality producing processes are also present for other categorical distinctions available in the data we use (education, permanent vs. temporary worker, dominant vs. marginal linguistic group in Australia, permanent vs. temporary worker and white vs. non-white in the U.S.). In the U.S. the coefficients for relational sex composition are twice as large as in Australia, suggesting historical-institutional differences between the countries enables gender to exert a stronger influence on between-class inequality in the U.S. We further examine the institutional differences in these categorical bases for inequality by examining the extent to which they vary within the two countries as a function of two historically relevant institutional distinctions in wage setting regimes-formalization in the U.S. and centralized wage awards in Australia. As expected these institutional differences shape the extent and type of between-class wage inequality. We conclude that researchers should move methodologically towards observing relations within organizations to reflect the theoretical advances of the past two decades.",
keywords = "Australia, Education, Income inequality, Organizations, Race, Relational models, Sex, U.S.",
author = "Donald Tomaskovic-Devey and Avent-Holt, {Dustin R} and Catherine Zimmer and Sandra Harding",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.rssm.2009.04.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "128--142",
journal = "Research in Social Stratification and Mobility",
issn = "0276-5624",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The categorical generation of organizational inequality

T2 - A comparative test of Tilly's durable inequality

AU - Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald

AU - Avent-Holt, Dustin R

AU - Zimmer, Catherine

AU - Harding, Sandra

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - This paper develops a theoretical and methodological application of Tilly's [Tilly, C. (1998). Durable inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press] assertions that inequalities are inherently relational and categorical. We focus on the specific proposition that inequalities are exaggerated when categorical social distinctions are mapped onto positional distinctions internal to organizations. Using samples of Australian and U.S. organizations we examine the influence of sex and other status distinctions upon between-class wage inequality. In both countries class inequality is exaggerated when workers are women and managers men. These between-class inequality producing processes are also present for other categorical distinctions available in the data we use (education, permanent vs. temporary worker, dominant vs. marginal linguistic group in Australia, permanent vs. temporary worker and white vs. non-white in the U.S.). In the U.S. the coefficients for relational sex composition are twice as large as in Australia, suggesting historical-institutional differences between the countries enables gender to exert a stronger influence on between-class inequality in the U.S. We further examine the institutional differences in these categorical bases for inequality by examining the extent to which they vary within the two countries as a function of two historically relevant institutional distinctions in wage setting regimes-formalization in the U.S. and centralized wage awards in Australia. As expected these institutional differences shape the extent and type of between-class wage inequality. We conclude that researchers should move methodologically towards observing relations within organizations to reflect the theoretical advances of the past two decades.

AB - This paper develops a theoretical and methodological application of Tilly's [Tilly, C. (1998). Durable inequality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press] assertions that inequalities are inherently relational and categorical. We focus on the specific proposition that inequalities are exaggerated when categorical social distinctions are mapped onto positional distinctions internal to organizations. Using samples of Australian and U.S. organizations we examine the influence of sex and other status distinctions upon between-class wage inequality. In both countries class inequality is exaggerated when workers are women and managers men. These between-class inequality producing processes are also present for other categorical distinctions available in the data we use (education, permanent vs. temporary worker, dominant vs. marginal linguistic group in Australia, permanent vs. temporary worker and white vs. non-white in the U.S.). In the U.S. the coefficients for relational sex composition are twice as large as in Australia, suggesting historical-institutional differences between the countries enables gender to exert a stronger influence on between-class inequality in the U.S. We further examine the institutional differences in these categorical bases for inequality by examining the extent to which they vary within the two countries as a function of two historically relevant institutional distinctions in wage setting regimes-formalization in the U.S. and centralized wage awards in Australia. As expected these institutional differences shape the extent and type of between-class wage inequality. We conclude that researchers should move methodologically towards observing relations within organizations to reflect the theoretical advances of the past two decades.

KW - Australia

KW - Education

KW - Income inequality

KW - Organizations

KW - Race

KW - Relational models

KW - Sex

KW - U.S.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68549101660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68549101660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.rssm.2009.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.rssm.2009.04.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:68549101660

VL - 27

SP - 128

EP - 142

JO - Research in Social Stratification and Mobility

JF - Research in Social Stratification and Mobility

SN - 0276-5624

IS - 3

ER -