The columbia registry of information and utilization management trials

E Andrew Balas, Marcia G. Stockham, Joyce A. Mitchell, Suzanne M. Austin, David A. West, Bernard C. Ewicman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To systematically locate, register, and abstract information used in comparing effects of various information services (computerized and noncomputerized) and utilization management interventions on the process and outcome of patient care. Design: Manual and electronic database searches located reports that met three main criteria: 1) randomized controlled trial; 2) information or utilization management intervention in the study group with no similar intervention in the control group; and 3) effect of the intervention on the process and/or outcome of patient care had been measured. Published reports were registered in the Columbia Registry. Results: Nearly 600 reports were collected from 24 countries and 189 different publications. Frequently tested interventions included patient or physician education, telephone follow-up, patient or physician reminders, and home care services. Frequently reported effect variables included hospitalization rate, length of stay, immunization rate, and mortality rate. Standardized formal tools were developed for the separation and abstraction of practical information and methodologic details from the collected trial reports. Conclusions: The registry provides a new source of information for meta-analyses, traditional reviews, and executive summaries of quality improvement of health services. The streamlined knowledge engineering process of quality evaluation and abstraction of critical information can generate helpful information for practitioners and researchers simultaneously.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)307-315
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume2
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Information Management
Registries
Patient Care
Physicians
Information Services
Home Care Services
Quality Improvement
Telephone
Health Services
Publications
Meta-Analysis
Immunization
Length of Stay
Hospitalization
Randomized Controlled Trials
Research Personnel
Databases
Education
Control Groups
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

The columbia registry of information and utilization management trials. / Balas, E Andrew; Stockham, Marcia G.; Mitchell, Joyce A.; Austin, Suzanne M.; West, David A.; Ewicman, Bernard C.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 2, No. 5, 01.01.1995, p. 307-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Balas, E Andrew ; Stockham, Marcia G. ; Mitchell, Joyce A. ; Austin, Suzanne M. ; West, David A. ; Ewicman, Bernard C. / The columbia registry of information and utilization management trials. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 1995 ; Vol. 2, No. 5. pp. 307-315.
@article{e14b78bd31e94c80883433f332027f98,
title = "The columbia registry of information and utilization management trials",
abstract = "Objective: To systematically locate, register, and abstract information used in comparing effects of various information services (computerized and noncomputerized) and utilization management interventions on the process and outcome of patient care. Design: Manual and electronic database searches located reports that met three main criteria: 1) randomized controlled trial; 2) information or utilization management intervention in the study group with no similar intervention in the control group; and 3) effect of the intervention on the process and/or outcome of patient care had been measured. Published reports were registered in the Columbia Registry. Results: Nearly 600 reports were collected from 24 countries and 189 different publications. Frequently tested interventions included patient or physician education, telephone follow-up, patient or physician reminders, and home care services. Frequently reported effect variables included hospitalization rate, length of stay, immunization rate, and mortality rate. Standardized formal tools were developed for the separation and abstraction of practical information and methodologic details from the collected trial reports. Conclusions: The registry provides a new source of information for meta-analyses, traditional reviews, and executive summaries of quality improvement of health services. The streamlined knowledge engineering process of quality evaluation and abstraction of critical information can generate helpful information for practitioners and researchers simultaneously.",
author = "Balas, {E Andrew} and Stockham, {Marcia G.} and Mitchell, {Joyce A.} and Austin, {Suzanne M.} and West, {David A.} and Ewicman, {Bernard C.}",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/jamia.1995.96073833",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "307--315",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The columbia registry of information and utilization management trials

AU - Balas, E Andrew

AU - Stockham, Marcia G.

AU - Mitchell, Joyce A.

AU - Austin, Suzanne M.

AU - West, David A.

AU - Ewicman, Bernard C.

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - Objective: To systematically locate, register, and abstract information used in comparing effects of various information services (computerized and noncomputerized) and utilization management interventions on the process and outcome of patient care. Design: Manual and electronic database searches located reports that met three main criteria: 1) randomized controlled trial; 2) information or utilization management intervention in the study group with no similar intervention in the control group; and 3) effect of the intervention on the process and/or outcome of patient care had been measured. Published reports were registered in the Columbia Registry. Results: Nearly 600 reports were collected from 24 countries and 189 different publications. Frequently tested interventions included patient or physician education, telephone follow-up, patient or physician reminders, and home care services. Frequently reported effect variables included hospitalization rate, length of stay, immunization rate, and mortality rate. Standardized formal tools were developed for the separation and abstraction of practical information and methodologic details from the collected trial reports. Conclusions: The registry provides a new source of information for meta-analyses, traditional reviews, and executive summaries of quality improvement of health services. The streamlined knowledge engineering process of quality evaluation and abstraction of critical information can generate helpful information for practitioners and researchers simultaneously.

AB - Objective: To systematically locate, register, and abstract information used in comparing effects of various information services (computerized and noncomputerized) and utilization management interventions on the process and outcome of patient care. Design: Manual and electronic database searches located reports that met three main criteria: 1) randomized controlled trial; 2) information or utilization management intervention in the study group with no similar intervention in the control group; and 3) effect of the intervention on the process and/or outcome of patient care had been measured. Published reports were registered in the Columbia Registry. Results: Nearly 600 reports were collected from 24 countries and 189 different publications. Frequently tested interventions included patient or physician education, telephone follow-up, patient or physician reminders, and home care services. Frequently reported effect variables included hospitalization rate, length of stay, immunization rate, and mortality rate. Standardized formal tools were developed for the separation and abstraction of practical information and methodologic details from the collected trial reports. Conclusions: The registry provides a new source of information for meta-analyses, traditional reviews, and executive summaries of quality improvement of health services. The streamlined knowledge engineering process of quality evaluation and abstraction of critical information can generate helpful information for practitioners and researchers simultaneously.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029363002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029363002&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/jamia.1995.96073833

DO - 10.1136/jamia.1995.96073833

M3 - Article

C2 - 7496880

AN - SCOPUS:0029363002

VL - 2

SP - 307

EP - 315

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 5

ER -