The Effect of Gender of Perpetrator and Victim on Perceptions of Psychological and Physical Intimate Partner Aggression

Georgina S Hammock, Deborah Ruth Richardson, Kenneth Brock Lamm, Elizabeth Taylor, Lauren M Verlaque

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most studies of third-party perceptions of intimate partner violence focus on heterosexual relationships and report that male-to-female aggression is perceived more negatively than female-to-male. Since gender of aggressor and gender of victim are consistently confounded in these portrayals, it is not clear whether the gender of the aggressor or the gender of the victim accounts for the effect. The present research manipulated gender of perpetrator and victim to unravel this confound. Two hundred and fifty one participants (166 females) read scenarios involving psychological or physical aggression between two males, two females, or a male and a female. Participants reported their perceptions of the encounter and the character and emotional reactions of the individual couple members. Physical aggression was evaluated more negatively than psychological aggression. Participants evaluated the encounter and the perpetrator and victim in a manner consistent with stereotypical gender roles, revealing more concern for female than male victims and greater denigration of male than female perpetrators. These results have implications for programs aimed at the reduction of intimate partner violence and the services and programs developed for perpetrators and victims.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)357-365
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Family Violence
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

Aggression
aggression
Psychology
gender
violence
gender role
Heterosexuality
Violence
scenario
Research

Keywords

  • Gender stereotypes
  • Intimate partner violence
  • Physical aggression
  • Psychological aggression

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law

Cite this

The Effect of Gender of Perpetrator and Victim on Perceptions of Psychological and Physical Intimate Partner Aggression. / Hammock, Georgina S; Richardson, Deborah Ruth; Lamm, Kenneth Brock; Taylor, Elizabeth; Verlaque, Lauren M.

In: Journal of Family Violence, Vol. 32, No. 3, 01.04.2017, p. 357-365.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{08c5c7f56cbb41c7beb72e1ad91579f6,
title = "The Effect of Gender of Perpetrator and Victim on Perceptions of Psychological and Physical Intimate Partner Aggression",
abstract = "Most studies of third-party perceptions of intimate partner violence focus on heterosexual relationships and report that male-to-female aggression is perceived more negatively than female-to-male. Since gender of aggressor and gender of victim are consistently confounded in these portrayals, it is not clear whether the gender of the aggressor or the gender of the victim accounts for the effect. The present research manipulated gender of perpetrator and victim to unravel this confound. Two hundred and fifty one participants (166 females) read scenarios involving psychological or physical aggression between two males, two females, or a male and a female. Participants reported their perceptions of the encounter and the character and emotional reactions of the individual couple members. Physical aggression was evaluated more negatively than psychological aggression. Participants evaluated the encounter and the perpetrator and victim in a manner consistent with stereotypical gender roles, revealing more concern for female than male victims and greater denigration of male than female perpetrators. These results have implications for programs aimed at the reduction of intimate partner violence and the services and programs developed for perpetrators and victims.",
keywords = "Gender stereotypes, Intimate partner violence, Physical aggression, Psychological aggression",
author = "Hammock, {Georgina S} and Richardson, {Deborah Ruth} and Lamm, {Kenneth Brock} and Elizabeth Taylor and Verlaque, {Lauren M}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10896-016-9850-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "357--365",
journal = "Journal of Fluorescence",
issn = "1053-0509",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effect of Gender of Perpetrator and Victim on Perceptions of Psychological and Physical Intimate Partner Aggression

AU - Hammock, Georgina S

AU - Richardson, Deborah Ruth

AU - Lamm, Kenneth Brock

AU - Taylor, Elizabeth

AU - Verlaque, Lauren M

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Most studies of third-party perceptions of intimate partner violence focus on heterosexual relationships and report that male-to-female aggression is perceived more negatively than female-to-male. Since gender of aggressor and gender of victim are consistently confounded in these portrayals, it is not clear whether the gender of the aggressor or the gender of the victim accounts for the effect. The present research manipulated gender of perpetrator and victim to unravel this confound. Two hundred and fifty one participants (166 females) read scenarios involving psychological or physical aggression between two males, two females, or a male and a female. Participants reported their perceptions of the encounter and the character and emotional reactions of the individual couple members. Physical aggression was evaluated more negatively than psychological aggression. Participants evaluated the encounter and the perpetrator and victim in a manner consistent with stereotypical gender roles, revealing more concern for female than male victims and greater denigration of male than female perpetrators. These results have implications for programs aimed at the reduction of intimate partner violence and the services and programs developed for perpetrators and victims.

AB - Most studies of third-party perceptions of intimate partner violence focus on heterosexual relationships and report that male-to-female aggression is perceived more negatively than female-to-male. Since gender of aggressor and gender of victim are consistently confounded in these portrayals, it is not clear whether the gender of the aggressor or the gender of the victim accounts for the effect. The present research manipulated gender of perpetrator and victim to unravel this confound. Two hundred and fifty one participants (166 females) read scenarios involving psychological or physical aggression between two males, two females, or a male and a female. Participants reported their perceptions of the encounter and the character and emotional reactions of the individual couple members. Physical aggression was evaluated more negatively than psychological aggression. Participants evaluated the encounter and the perpetrator and victim in a manner consistent with stereotypical gender roles, revealing more concern for female than male victims and greater denigration of male than female perpetrators. These results have implications for programs aimed at the reduction of intimate partner violence and the services and programs developed for perpetrators and victims.

KW - Gender stereotypes

KW - Intimate partner violence

KW - Physical aggression

KW - Psychological aggression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984920755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984920755&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10896-016-9850-y

DO - 10.1007/s10896-016-9850-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84984920755

VL - 32

SP - 357

EP - 365

JO - Journal of Fluorescence

JF - Journal of Fluorescence

SN - 1053-0509

IS - 3

ER -