The effect of situational contingencies on female retaliative behavior

Deborah Ruth Richardson, Sandy Bernstein, Stuart P. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most studies that have found sex differences in aggression have reported that males are more aggressive than females. Recent evidence, however, suggests that the expectation of female nonaggressiveness may be unwarranted. The present study attempted to reconcile these differences by considering the contingencies of female aggression. 30 undergraduate females competed in a task designed to measure aggression (a) alone, (b) in the presence of a silent observer, or (c) in the presence of a supportive observer. Results indicated that as provocation increased, Ss in the private condition responded more aggressively than did Ss in the public condition. Also, Ss who responded in the presence of an audience were more aggressive when the observer was supportive than when she was silent. It is concluded that the usual findings of female nonaggressiveness may be attributable to women's expectations of disapproval for aggressive behavior. (15 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2044-2048
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume37
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 1979
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

contingency
aggression
Aggression
provocation
aggressive behavior
Sex Characteristics
evidence

Keywords

  • presence of silent vs supportive O, aggressive behavior, female college students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

The effect of situational contingencies on female retaliative behavior. / Richardson, Deborah Ruth; Bernstein, Sandy; Taylor, Stuart P.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 37, No. 11, 01.11.1979, p. 2044-2048.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f7af248b9564a79956e7b5e7a90919f,
title = "The effect of situational contingencies on female retaliative behavior",
abstract = "Most studies that have found sex differences in aggression have reported that males are more aggressive than females. Recent evidence, however, suggests that the expectation of female nonaggressiveness may be unwarranted. The present study attempted to reconcile these differences by considering the contingencies of female aggression. 30 undergraduate females competed in a task designed to measure aggression (a) alone, (b) in the presence of a silent observer, or (c) in the presence of a supportive observer. Results indicated that as provocation increased, Ss in the private condition responded more aggressively than did Ss in the public condition. Also, Ss who responded in the presence of an audience were more aggressive when the observer was supportive than when she was silent. It is concluded that the usual findings of female nonaggressiveness may be attributable to women's expectations of disapproval for aggressive behavior. (15 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "presence of silent vs supportive O, aggressive behavior, female college students",
author = "Richardson, {Deborah Ruth} and Sandy Bernstein and Taylor, {Stuart P.}",
year = "1979",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "2044--2048",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of situational contingencies on female retaliative behavior

AU - Richardson, Deborah Ruth

AU - Bernstein, Sandy

AU - Taylor, Stuart P.

PY - 1979/11/1

Y1 - 1979/11/1

N2 - Most studies that have found sex differences in aggression have reported that males are more aggressive than females. Recent evidence, however, suggests that the expectation of female nonaggressiveness may be unwarranted. The present study attempted to reconcile these differences by considering the contingencies of female aggression. 30 undergraduate females competed in a task designed to measure aggression (a) alone, (b) in the presence of a silent observer, or (c) in the presence of a supportive observer. Results indicated that as provocation increased, Ss in the private condition responded more aggressively than did Ss in the public condition. Also, Ss who responded in the presence of an audience were more aggressive when the observer was supportive than when she was silent. It is concluded that the usual findings of female nonaggressiveness may be attributable to women's expectations of disapproval for aggressive behavior. (15 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Most studies that have found sex differences in aggression have reported that males are more aggressive than females. Recent evidence, however, suggests that the expectation of female nonaggressiveness may be unwarranted. The present study attempted to reconcile these differences by considering the contingencies of female aggression. 30 undergraduate females competed in a task designed to measure aggression (a) alone, (b) in the presence of a silent observer, or (c) in the presence of a supportive observer. Results indicated that as provocation increased, Ss in the private condition responded more aggressively than did Ss in the public condition. Also, Ss who responded in the presence of an audience were more aggressive when the observer was supportive than when she was silent. It is concluded that the usual findings of female nonaggressiveness may be attributable to women's expectations of disapproval for aggressive behavior. (15 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - presence of silent vs supportive O, aggressive behavior, female college students

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018539077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018539077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2044

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2044

M3 - Article

C2 - 521901

AN - SCOPUS:0018539077

VL - 37

SP - 2044

EP - 2048

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 11

ER -