The effect of ultrasound guidance on the perceived difficulty of emergency nurse-obtained peripheral IV access

Michael Blaivas, Matthew L Lyon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Emergency nurses (ENs) typically place peripheral intravenous (IV) lines, but if repeated attempts fail, patients usually receive central line access. To measure the effect of ultrasound (US) guidance on the perceived difficulty of EN peripheral IV access in Emergency Department patients, a prospective observational study was conducted of ENs in a level I trauma center with a census of 75,000, performing US-guided IV line placement in difficult stick patients (difficult or hard stick patients defined as repeated blind IV placement failure or established history of blind IV placement failure). ENs trained on an inanimate model after a 45-min lecture. Surveys were filled out after each US-guided IV attempt on a patient. ENs could decline to fill out surveys, which recorded reason for US use, type of patient, success, technique used, and difficulty. Successful cannulation was confirmed by drawing blood and infusion of 100 mL of IV fluids. Student's t-test was used to compare data. A total of 321 surveys were collected in a 5-month period; no ENs declined to participate. There were 258 (80%) of the patients rated as very hard sticks before US, 59 as hard, 3 as easy, and none as very easy. Of the 258 very hard sticks without US, 29 were still rated as very hard even with US use; 43 changed to hard, 112 changed to easy and 137 to very easy. After a brief tutorial, ultrasound guidance for IV access in emergency patients significantly decreased the perceived difficulty in difficult access patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-410
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2006

Fingerprint

Emergencies
Nurses
Trauma Centers
Censuses
Catheterization
Observational Studies
Hospital Emergency Service
Prospective Studies
Students
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • emergency medicine
  • emergency nurse education
  • emergency ultrasound
  • ultrasound
  • ultrasound assisted line placement
  • ultrasound education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

The effect of ultrasound guidance on the perceived difficulty of emergency nurse-obtained peripheral IV access. / Blaivas, Michael; Lyon, Matthew L.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.11.2006, p. 407-410.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a733e30cc2ed452899f5ec3000e1aeab,
title = "The effect of ultrasound guidance on the perceived difficulty of emergency nurse-obtained peripheral IV access",
abstract = "Emergency nurses (ENs) typically place peripheral intravenous (IV) lines, but if repeated attempts fail, patients usually receive central line access. To measure the effect of ultrasound (US) guidance on the perceived difficulty of EN peripheral IV access in Emergency Department patients, a prospective observational study was conducted of ENs in a level I trauma center with a census of 75,000, performing US-guided IV line placement in difficult stick patients (difficult or hard stick patients defined as repeated blind IV placement failure or established history of blind IV placement failure). ENs trained on an inanimate model after a 45-min lecture. Surveys were filled out after each US-guided IV attempt on a patient. ENs could decline to fill out surveys, which recorded reason for US use, type of patient, success, technique used, and difficulty. Successful cannulation was confirmed by drawing blood and infusion of 100 mL of IV fluids. Student's t-test was used to compare data. A total of 321 surveys were collected in a 5-month period; no ENs declined to participate. There were 258 (80{\%}) of the patients rated as very hard sticks before US, 59 as hard, 3 as easy, and none as very easy. Of the 258 very hard sticks without US, 29 were still rated as very hard even with US use; 43 changed to hard, 112 changed to easy and 137 to very easy. After a brief tutorial, ultrasound guidance for IV access in emergency patients significantly decreased the perceived difficulty in difficult access patients.",
keywords = "emergency medicine, emergency nurse education, emergency ultrasound, ultrasound, ultrasound assisted line placement, ultrasound education",
author = "Michael Blaivas and Lyon, {Matthew L}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.04.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "407--410",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of ultrasound guidance on the perceived difficulty of emergency nurse-obtained peripheral IV access

AU - Blaivas, Michael

AU - Lyon, Matthew L

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - Emergency nurses (ENs) typically place peripheral intravenous (IV) lines, but if repeated attempts fail, patients usually receive central line access. To measure the effect of ultrasound (US) guidance on the perceived difficulty of EN peripheral IV access in Emergency Department patients, a prospective observational study was conducted of ENs in a level I trauma center with a census of 75,000, performing US-guided IV line placement in difficult stick patients (difficult or hard stick patients defined as repeated blind IV placement failure or established history of blind IV placement failure). ENs trained on an inanimate model after a 45-min lecture. Surveys were filled out after each US-guided IV attempt on a patient. ENs could decline to fill out surveys, which recorded reason for US use, type of patient, success, technique used, and difficulty. Successful cannulation was confirmed by drawing blood and infusion of 100 mL of IV fluids. Student's t-test was used to compare data. A total of 321 surveys were collected in a 5-month period; no ENs declined to participate. There were 258 (80%) of the patients rated as very hard sticks before US, 59 as hard, 3 as easy, and none as very easy. Of the 258 very hard sticks without US, 29 were still rated as very hard even with US use; 43 changed to hard, 112 changed to easy and 137 to very easy. After a brief tutorial, ultrasound guidance for IV access in emergency patients significantly decreased the perceived difficulty in difficult access patients.

AB - Emergency nurses (ENs) typically place peripheral intravenous (IV) lines, but if repeated attempts fail, patients usually receive central line access. To measure the effect of ultrasound (US) guidance on the perceived difficulty of EN peripheral IV access in Emergency Department patients, a prospective observational study was conducted of ENs in a level I trauma center with a census of 75,000, performing US-guided IV line placement in difficult stick patients (difficult or hard stick patients defined as repeated blind IV placement failure or established history of blind IV placement failure). ENs trained on an inanimate model after a 45-min lecture. Surveys were filled out after each US-guided IV attempt on a patient. ENs could decline to fill out surveys, which recorded reason for US use, type of patient, success, technique used, and difficulty. Successful cannulation was confirmed by drawing blood and infusion of 100 mL of IV fluids. Student's t-test was used to compare data. A total of 321 surveys were collected in a 5-month period; no ENs declined to participate. There were 258 (80%) of the patients rated as very hard sticks before US, 59 as hard, 3 as easy, and none as very easy. Of the 258 very hard sticks without US, 29 were still rated as very hard even with US use; 43 changed to hard, 112 changed to easy and 137 to very easy. After a brief tutorial, ultrasound guidance for IV access in emergency patients significantly decreased the perceived difficulty in difficult access patients.

KW - emergency medicine

KW - emergency nurse education

KW - emergency ultrasound

KW - ultrasound

KW - ultrasound assisted line placement

KW - ultrasound education

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749519147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749519147&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.04.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.04.014

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 407

EP - 410

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 4

ER -