The geographic availability and associated utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing among older persons in the United States

J. R. Curtis, A. Laster, D. J. Becker, Laura D Carbone, L. C. Gary, M. L. Kilgore, R. S. Matthews, M. A. Morrisey, K. G. Saag, S. B. Tanner, E. Delzell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary: Using national Medicare data from 1999-2006, we evaluated the relationship between travel distance and receipt of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). After adjusting for potentially confounding factors, travel distance was strongly associated with DXA testing. Rural residents were most strongly dependent on the availability of DXAs performed in physician offices. Introduction: Medicare reimbursement for DXAs performed in non-facility settings (e.g., physician offices) decreased in 2007. With declining reimbursement, some DXA providers may cease providing this service, which would increase travel distance for some people. The impact of travel distance on access to DXA is unclear. Methods: Using national Medicare data, we identified claims for DXA to evaluate trends in the number and locations of DXAs performed. Travel distance was the distance from beneficiaries' residence and the nearest DXA provider. Binomial regression evaluated the relationship between travel distance and receipt of DXA. Results: In 2006, 2.9 million DXAs were performed, a 103% increase since 1999. In 2005-2006, 8.0% of persons were tested at non-facility sites versus 4.2% at facility sites. The remainder (88%) had no DXA. Persons traveling 5-9, 10-24, 25-39, and 40-54, and ≥55 miles were less likely to receive DXA (adjusted risk ratios = 0.92, 0.79, 0.43, 0.32, and 0.26, respectively, <5 miles referent). Rural residents were more dependent than urban residents on the availability of DXA from non-facility providers. Conclusion: Approximately two-thirds of DXAs in 2005-2006 were performed in non-facility settings (e.g., physician offices). Rural residents would have preferentially reduced access to DXA if there were fewer non-facility sites.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1553-1561
Number of pages9
JournalOsteoporosis International
Volume20
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Photon Absorptiometry
Physicians' Offices
Medicare
Odds Ratio

Keywords

  • Bone mineral density
  • Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)
  • Osteoporosis
  • Travel distance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

The geographic availability and associated utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing among older persons in the United States. / Curtis, J. R.; Laster, A.; Becker, D. J.; Carbone, Laura D; Gary, L. C.; Kilgore, M. L.; Matthews, R. S.; Morrisey, M. A.; Saag, K. G.; Tanner, S. B.; Delzell, E.

In: Osteoporosis International, Vol. 20, No. 9, 01.09.2009, p. 1553-1561.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Curtis, JR, Laster, A, Becker, DJ, Carbone, LD, Gary, LC, Kilgore, ML, Matthews, RS, Morrisey, MA, Saag, KG, Tanner, SB & Delzell, E 2009, 'The geographic availability and associated utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing among older persons in the United States', Osteoporosis International, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1553-1561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0821-x
Curtis, J. R. ; Laster, A. ; Becker, D. J. ; Carbone, Laura D ; Gary, L. C. ; Kilgore, M. L. ; Matthews, R. S. ; Morrisey, M. A. ; Saag, K. G. ; Tanner, S. B. ; Delzell, E. / The geographic availability and associated utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing among older persons in the United States. In: Osteoporosis International. 2009 ; Vol. 20, No. 9. pp. 1553-1561.
@article{8f72739028b04d0298413bc8d2173781,
title = "The geographic availability and associated utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing among older persons in the United States",
abstract = "Summary: Using national Medicare data from 1999-2006, we evaluated the relationship between travel distance and receipt of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). After adjusting for potentially confounding factors, travel distance was strongly associated with DXA testing. Rural residents were most strongly dependent on the availability of DXAs performed in physician offices. Introduction: Medicare reimbursement for DXAs performed in non-facility settings (e.g., physician offices) decreased in 2007. With declining reimbursement, some DXA providers may cease providing this service, which would increase travel distance for some people. The impact of travel distance on access to DXA is unclear. Methods: Using national Medicare data, we identified claims for DXA to evaluate trends in the number and locations of DXAs performed. Travel distance was the distance from beneficiaries' residence and the nearest DXA provider. Binomial regression evaluated the relationship between travel distance and receipt of DXA. Results: In 2006, 2.9 million DXAs were performed, a 103{\%} increase since 1999. In 2005-2006, 8.0{\%} of persons were tested at non-facility sites versus 4.2{\%} at facility sites. The remainder (88{\%}) had no DXA. Persons traveling 5-9, 10-24, 25-39, and 40-54, and ≥55 miles were less likely to receive DXA (adjusted risk ratios = 0.92, 0.79, 0.43, 0.32, and 0.26, respectively, <5 miles referent). Rural residents were more dependent than urban residents on the availability of DXA from non-facility providers. Conclusion: Approximately two-thirds of DXAs in 2005-2006 were performed in non-facility settings (e.g., physician offices). Rural residents would have preferentially reduced access to DXA if there were fewer non-facility sites.",
keywords = "Bone mineral density, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), Osteoporosis, Travel distance",
author = "Curtis, {J. R.} and A. Laster and Becker, {D. J.} and Carbone, {Laura D} and Gary, {L. C.} and Kilgore, {M. L.} and Matthews, {R. S.} and Morrisey, {M. A.} and Saag, {K. G.} and Tanner, {S. B.} and E. Delzell",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00198-008-0821-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1553--1561",
journal = "Osteoporosis International",
issn = "0937-941X",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The geographic availability and associated utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing among older persons in the United States

AU - Curtis, J. R.

AU - Laster, A.

AU - Becker, D. J.

AU - Carbone, Laura D

AU - Gary, L. C.

AU - Kilgore, M. L.

AU - Matthews, R. S.

AU - Morrisey, M. A.

AU - Saag, K. G.

AU - Tanner, S. B.

AU - Delzell, E.

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - Summary: Using national Medicare data from 1999-2006, we evaluated the relationship between travel distance and receipt of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). After adjusting for potentially confounding factors, travel distance was strongly associated with DXA testing. Rural residents were most strongly dependent on the availability of DXAs performed in physician offices. Introduction: Medicare reimbursement for DXAs performed in non-facility settings (e.g., physician offices) decreased in 2007. With declining reimbursement, some DXA providers may cease providing this service, which would increase travel distance for some people. The impact of travel distance on access to DXA is unclear. Methods: Using national Medicare data, we identified claims for DXA to evaluate trends in the number and locations of DXAs performed. Travel distance was the distance from beneficiaries' residence and the nearest DXA provider. Binomial regression evaluated the relationship between travel distance and receipt of DXA. Results: In 2006, 2.9 million DXAs were performed, a 103% increase since 1999. In 2005-2006, 8.0% of persons were tested at non-facility sites versus 4.2% at facility sites. The remainder (88%) had no DXA. Persons traveling 5-9, 10-24, 25-39, and 40-54, and ≥55 miles were less likely to receive DXA (adjusted risk ratios = 0.92, 0.79, 0.43, 0.32, and 0.26, respectively, <5 miles referent). Rural residents were more dependent than urban residents on the availability of DXA from non-facility providers. Conclusion: Approximately two-thirds of DXAs in 2005-2006 were performed in non-facility settings (e.g., physician offices). Rural residents would have preferentially reduced access to DXA if there were fewer non-facility sites.

AB - Summary: Using national Medicare data from 1999-2006, we evaluated the relationship between travel distance and receipt of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). After adjusting for potentially confounding factors, travel distance was strongly associated with DXA testing. Rural residents were most strongly dependent on the availability of DXAs performed in physician offices. Introduction: Medicare reimbursement for DXAs performed in non-facility settings (e.g., physician offices) decreased in 2007. With declining reimbursement, some DXA providers may cease providing this service, which would increase travel distance for some people. The impact of travel distance on access to DXA is unclear. Methods: Using national Medicare data, we identified claims for DXA to evaluate trends in the number and locations of DXAs performed. Travel distance was the distance from beneficiaries' residence and the nearest DXA provider. Binomial regression evaluated the relationship between travel distance and receipt of DXA. Results: In 2006, 2.9 million DXAs were performed, a 103% increase since 1999. In 2005-2006, 8.0% of persons were tested at non-facility sites versus 4.2% at facility sites. The remainder (88%) had no DXA. Persons traveling 5-9, 10-24, 25-39, and 40-54, and ≥55 miles were less likely to receive DXA (adjusted risk ratios = 0.92, 0.79, 0.43, 0.32, and 0.26, respectively, <5 miles referent). Rural residents were more dependent than urban residents on the availability of DXA from non-facility providers. Conclusion: Approximately two-thirds of DXAs in 2005-2006 were performed in non-facility settings (e.g., physician offices). Rural residents would have preferentially reduced access to DXA if there were fewer non-facility sites.

KW - Bone mineral density

KW - Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

KW - Osteoporosis

KW - Travel distance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68949206635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68949206635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00198-008-0821-x

DO - 10.1007/s00198-008-0821-x

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1553

EP - 1561

JO - Osteoporosis International

JF - Osteoporosis International

SN - 0937-941X

IS - 9

ER -