The in vitro fidelity of yeast DNA polymerase δ and polymerase e{open} holoenzymes during dinucleotide microsatellite DNA synthesis

Amy L. Abdulovic, Suzanne E. Hile, Thomas A. Kunkel, Kristin A. Eckert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Elucidating the sources of genetic variation within microsatellite alleles has important implications for understanding the etiology of human diseases. Mismatch repair is a well described pathway for the suppression of microsatellite instability. However, the cellular polymerases responsible for generating microsatellite errors have not been fully described. We address this gap in knowledge by measuring the fidelity of recombinant yeast polymerase δ (Pol δ) and e{open} (Pol e{open}) holoenzymes during synthesis of a [GT/CA] microsatellite. The in vitro HSV-tk forward assay was used to measure DNA polymerase errors generated during gap-filling of complementary GT10 and CA10-containing substrates and ∼90 nucleotides of HSV-tk coding sequence surrounding the microsatellites. The observed mutant frequencies within the microsatellites were 4 to 30-fold higher than the observed mutant frequencies within the coding sequence. More specifically, the rate of Pol δ and Pol e{open} misalignment-based insertion/deletion errors within the microsatellites was ∼1000-fold higher than the rate of insertion/deletion errors within the HSV-tk gene. Although the most common microsatellite error was the deletion of a single repeat unit, ∼ 20% of errors were deletions of two or more units for both polymerases. The differences in fidelity for wild type enzymes and their exonuclease-deficient derivatives were ∼2-fold for unit-based microsatellite insertion/deletion errors. Interestingly, the exonucleases preferentially removed potentially stabilizing interruption errors within the microsatellites. Since Pol δ and Pol e{open} perform not only the bulk of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells but also are implicated in performing DNA synthesis associated with repair and recombination, these results indicate that microsatellite errors may be introduced into the genome during multiple DNA metabolic pathways.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)497-505
Number of pages9
JournalDNA Repair
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 5 2011

Fingerprint

Holoenzymes
DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase
Microsatellite Repeats
Yeast
Yeasts
DNA
Exonucleases
Repair
In Vitro Techniques
Genes
Recombinational DNA Repair
Microsatellite Instability
DNA Mismatch Repair
Eukaryotic Cells
Metabolic Networks and Pathways
DNA Replication
Nucleotides
Assays
Alleles
Genome

Keywords

  • DNA replication fidelity
  • HSV-tk gene
  • Indel mutation
  • Microsatellite instability
  • Polymerase proofreading

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

The in vitro fidelity of yeast DNA polymerase δ and polymerase e{open} holoenzymes during dinucleotide microsatellite DNA synthesis. / Abdulovic, Amy L.; Hile, Suzanne E.; Kunkel, Thomas A.; Eckert, Kristin A.

In: DNA Repair, Vol. 10, No. 5, 05.05.2011, p. 497-505.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abdulovic, Amy L. ; Hile, Suzanne E. ; Kunkel, Thomas A. ; Eckert, Kristin A. / The in vitro fidelity of yeast DNA polymerase δ and polymerase e{open} holoenzymes during dinucleotide microsatellite DNA synthesis. In: DNA Repair. 2011 ; Vol. 10, No. 5. pp. 497-505.
@article{19d469552ff2462a89bf4e0278af67a3,
title = "The in vitro fidelity of yeast DNA polymerase δ and polymerase e{open} holoenzymes during dinucleotide microsatellite DNA synthesis",
abstract = "Elucidating the sources of genetic variation within microsatellite alleles has important implications for understanding the etiology of human diseases. Mismatch repair is a well described pathway for the suppression of microsatellite instability. However, the cellular polymerases responsible for generating microsatellite errors have not been fully described. We address this gap in knowledge by measuring the fidelity of recombinant yeast polymerase δ (Pol δ) and e{open} (Pol e{open}) holoenzymes during synthesis of a [GT/CA] microsatellite. The in vitro HSV-tk forward assay was used to measure DNA polymerase errors generated during gap-filling of complementary GT10 and CA10-containing substrates and ∼90 nucleotides of HSV-tk coding sequence surrounding the microsatellites. The observed mutant frequencies within the microsatellites were 4 to 30-fold higher than the observed mutant frequencies within the coding sequence. More specifically, the rate of Pol δ and Pol e{open} misalignment-based insertion/deletion errors within the microsatellites was ∼1000-fold higher than the rate of insertion/deletion errors within the HSV-tk gene. Although the most common microsatellite error was the deletion of a single repeat unit, ∼ 20{\%} of errors were deletions of two or more units for both polymerases. The differences in fidelity for wild type enzymes and their exonuclease-deficient derivatives were ∼2-fold for unit-based microsatellite insertion/deletion errors. Interestingly, the exonucleases preferentially removed potentially stabilizing interruption errors within the microsatellites. Since Pol δ and Pol e{open} perform not only the bulk of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells but also are implicated in performing DNA synthesis associated with repair and recombination, these results indicate that microsatellite errors may be introduced into the genome during multiple DNA metabolic pathways.",
keywords = "DNA replication fidelity, HSV-tk gene, Indel mutation, Microsatellite instability, Polymerase proofreading",
author = "Abdulovic, {Amy L.} and Hile, {Suzanne E.} and Kunkel, {Thomas A.} and Eckert, {Kristin A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.02.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "497--505",
journal = "DNA Repair",
issn = "1568-7864",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The in vitro fidelity of yeast DNA polymerase δ and polymerase e{open} holoenzymes during dinucleotide microsatellite DNA synthesis

AU - Abdulovic, Amy L.

AU - Hile, Suzanne E.

AU - Kunkel, Thomas A.

AU - Eckert, Kristin A.

PY - 2011/5/5

Y1 - 2011/5/5

N2 - Elucidating the sources of genetic variation within microsatellite alleles has important implications for understanding the etiology of human diseases. Mismatch repair is a well described pathway for the suppression of microsatellite instability. However, the cellular polymerases responsible for generating microsatellite errors have not been fully described. We address this gap in knowledge by measuring the fidelity of recombinant yeast polymerase δ (Pol δ) and e{open} (Pol e{open}) holoenzymes during synthesis of a [GT/CA] microsatellite. The in vitro HSV-tk forward assay was used to measure DNA polymerase errors generated during gap-filling of complementary GT10 and CA10-containing substrates and ∼90 nucleotides of HSV-tk coding sequence surrounding the microsatellites. The observed mutant frequencies within the microsatellites were 4 to 30-fold higher than the observed mutant frequencies within the coding sequence. More specifically, the rate of Pol δ and Pol e{open} misalignment-based insertion/deletion errors within the microsatellites was ∼1000-fold higher than the rate of insertion/deletion errors within the HSV-tk gene. Although the most common microsatellite error was the deletion of a single repeat unit, ∼ 20% of errors were deletions of two or more units for both polymerases. The differences in fidelity for wild type enzymes and their exonuclease-deficient derivatives were ∼2-fold for unit-based microsatellite insertion/deletion errors. Interestingly, the exonucleases preferentially removed potentially stabilizing interruption errors within the microsatellites. Since Pol δ and Pol e{open} perform not only the bulk of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells but also are implicated in performing DNA synthesis associated with repair and recombination, these results indicate that microsatellite errors may be introduced into the genome during multiple DNA metabolic pathways.

AB - Elucidating the sources of genetic variation within microsatellite alleles has important implications for understanding the etiology of human diseases. Mismatch repair is a well described pathway for the suppression of microsatellite instability. However, the cellular polymerases responsible for generating microsatellite errors have not been fully described. We address this gap in knowledge by measuring the fidelity of recombinant yeast polymerase δ (Pol δ) and e{open} (Pol e{open}) holoenzymes during synthesis of a [GT/CA] microsatellite. The in vitro HSV-tk forward assay was used to measure DNA polymerase errors generated during gap-filling of complementary GT10 and CA10-containing substrates and ∼90 nucleotides of HSV-tk coding sequence surrounding the microsatellites. The observed mutant frequencies within the microsatellites were 4 to 30-fold higher than the observed mutant frequencies within the coding sequence. More specifically, the rate of Pol δ and Pol e{open} misalignment-based insertion/deletion errors within the microsatellites was ∼1000-fold higher than the rate of insertion/deletion errors within the HSV-tk gene. Although the most common microsatellite error was the deletion of a single repeat unit, ∼ 20% of errors were deletions of two or more units for both polymerases. The differences in fidelity for wild type enzymes and their exonuclease-deficient derivatives were ∼2-fold for unit-based microsatellite insertion/deletion errors. Interestingly, the exonucleases preferentially removed potentially stabilizing interruption errors within the microsatellites. Since Pol δ and Pol e{open} perform not only the bulk of DNA replication in eukaryotic cells but also are implicated in performing DNA synthesis associated with repair and recombination, these results indicate that microsatellite errors may be introduced into the genome during multiple DNA metabolic pathways.

KW - DNA replication fidelity

KW - HSV-tk gene

KW - Indel mutation

KW - Microsatellite instability

KW - Polymerase proofreading

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955092142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955092142&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.dnarep.2011.02.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 21429821

AN - SCOPUS:79955092142

VL - 10

SP - 497

EP - 505

JO - DNA Repair

JF - DNA Repair

SN - 1568-7864

IS - 5

ER -