The nonstress test as a diagnostic test: A critical reappraisal

Lawrence D Devoe, Ramon A. Castillo, Donald M. Sherline

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the past decade the nonstress test has become a major method of assessing high-risk pregnancy. Although many studies have been published, there has been a lack of rigorous adherence to the standard criteria for diagnostic testing, that is, presentation of test specificity, sensitivity, predictive value, and the prevalence of abnormal outcomes in the populations studied. Furthermore, the populations studied vary widely in composition, testing conditions, methods of test interpretation, and clinical management. The authors undertake a review of these studies, with a focus on these issues, in an attempt to indicate potential problems involved in current test usage and to suggest avenues for needed clinical investigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1047-1053
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume152
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 15 1985

Fingerprint

Routine Diagnostic Tests
High-Risk Pregnancy
Population
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Nonstress test
  • predictive value
  • sensitivity
  • specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

The nonstress test as a diagnostic test : A critical reappraisal. / Devoe, Lawrence D; Castillo, Ramon A.; Sherline, Donald M.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 152, No. 8, 15.08.1985, p. 1047-1053.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Devoe, Lawrence D ; Castillo, Ramon A. ; Sherline, Donald M. / The nonstress test as a diagnostic test : A critical reappraisal. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1985 ; Vol. 152, No. 8. pp. 1047-1053.
@article{c43124669a6c42979d25b3794478869b,
title = "The nonstress test as a diagnostic test: A critical reappraisal",
abstract = "In the past decade the nonstress test has become a major method of assessing high-risk pregnancy. Although many studies have been published, there has been a lack of rigorous adherence to the standard criteria for diagnostic testing, that is, presentation of test specificity, sensitivity, predictive value, and the prevalence of abnormal outcomes in the populations studied. Furthermore, the populations studied vary widely in composition, testing conditions, methods of test interpretation, and clinical management. The authors undertake a review of these studies, with a focus on these issues, in an attempt to indicate potential problems involved in current test usage and to suggest avenues for needed clinical investigation.",
keywords = "Nonstress test, predictive value, sensitivity, specificity",
author = "Devoe, {Lawrence D} and Castillo, {Ramon A.} and Sherline, {Donald M.}",
year = "1985",
month = "8",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9378(85)90560-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "152",
pages = "1047--1053",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The nonstress test as a diagnostic test

T2 - A critical reappraisal

AU - Devoe, Lawrence D

AU - Castillo, Ramon A.

AU - Sherline, Donald M.

PY - 1985/8/15

Y1 - 1985/8/15

N2 - In the past decade the nonstress test has become a major method of assessing high-risk pregnancy. Although many studies have been published, there has been a lack of rigorous adherence to the standard criteria for diagnostic testing, that is, presentation of test specificity, sensitivity, predictive value, and the prevalence of abnormal outcomes in the populations studied. Furthermore, the populations studied vary widely in composition, testing conditions, methods of test interpretation, and clinical management. The authors undertake a review of these studies, with a focus on these issues, in an attempt to indicate potential problems involved in current test usage and to suggest avenues for needed clinical investigation.

AB - In the past decade the nonstress test has become a major method of assessing high-risk pregnancy. Although many studies have been published, there has been a lack of rigorous adherence to the standard criteria for diagnostic testing, that is, presentation of test specificity, sensitivity, predictive value, and the prevalence of abnormal outcomes in the populations studied. Furthermore, the populations studied vary widely in composition, testing conditions, methods of test interpretation, and clinical management. The authors undertake a review of these studies, with a focus on these issues, in an attempt to indicate potential problems involved in current test usage and to suggest avenues for needed clinical investigation.

KW - Nonstress test

KW - predictive value

KW - sensitivity

KW - specificity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021835878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021835878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90560-5

DO - 10.1016/0002-9378(85)90560-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 3927736

AN - SCOPUS:0021835878

VL - 152

SP - 1047

EP - 1053

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 8

ER -