The physiological effects of hyperosmolar resuscitation: 5% vs 3% hypertonic saline

Bellal Joseph, Hassan Aziz, Margeaux Snell, Viraj Pandit, Daniel Hays, Narong Kulvatunyou, Andrew Tang, Terence OKeeffe, Julie Wynne, Randall S. Friese, Peter Rhee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Use of 5% normal saline (NS) is gaining renewed interest. The primary aim of our study was to compare the physiological effects after the administration of different concentrations of hypertonic saline (3% vs 5%NS) in the initial resuscitation of trauma.

Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of all trauma patients who received hypertonic saline during initial resuscitation. Medical records were reviewed for serum electrolytes and serum osmolarity, coagulation parameters, complications, and mortality.

Conclusions The 5%NS has sustained higher serum osmolarity and serum sodium concentration within the first 72 hours without any increase in adverse effects in comparison with 3%NS.

Results A total of 212 patients were included in the study, of which 170 patients received 5%NS and 42 patients received 3%NS. Both groups were similar in age (41.16 ± 19 vs 44.17 + 23.6; P =.45) and ISS score (26 [17 to 29] vs 25 [16 to 27]; P =.6). Mean serum osmolarity (316 ± 20.3 vs 294 ± 22.5; P =.02) and serum sodium levels (143 ± 8.6 vs 137 ± 10.9; P <.001) remained higher in the 5%NS group within 72 hours of admission. The pH was lower in the 5%NS group compared with the 3%NS group at 24 hours (7.29 ±.12 vs 7.33 ±.12; P =.01); however, at 48 and 72 hours (7.40 ±.07 vs 7.41 ±.07; P =.7), no difference was found. There was no difference in blood products requirement (1,734 vs 2,253 mL; P =.11) between the 2 groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)697-702
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume208
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Resuscitation
Serum
Osmolar Concentration
Sodium
Injury Severity Score
Wounds and Injuries
Electrolytes
Medical Records
Databases
Mortality

Keywords

  • 5% Normal saline
  • Complications
  • Hypertonic saline
  • Physiological effects
  • Serum sodium

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Joseph, B., Aziz, H., Snell, M., Pandit, V., Hays, D., Kulvatunyou, N., ... Rhee, P. (2014). The physiological effects of hyperosmolar resuscitation: 5% vs 3% hypertonic saline. American Journal of Surgery, 208(5), 697-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.01.009

The physiological effects of hyperosmolar resuscitation : 5% vs 3% hypertonic saline. / Joseph, Bellal; Aziz, Hassan; Snell, Margeaux; Pandit, Viraj; Hays, Daniel; Kulvatunyou, Narong; Tang, Andrew; OKeeffe, Terence; Wynne, Julie; Friese, Randall S.; Rhee, Peter.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 208, No. 5, 01.11.2014, p. 697-702.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Joseph, B, Aziz, H, Snell, M, Pandit, V, Hays, D, Kulvatunyou, N, Tang, A, OKeeffe, T, Wynne, J, Friese, RS & Rhee, P 2014, 'The physiological effects of hyperosmolar resuscitation: 5% vs 3% hypertonic saline', American Journal of Surgery, vol. 208, no. 5, pp. 697-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.01.009
Joseph, Bellal ; Aziz, Hassan ; Snell, Margeaux ; Pandit, Viraj ; Hays, Daniel ; Kulvatunyou, Narong ; Tang, Andrew ; OKeeffe, Terence ; Wynne, Julie ; Friese, Randall S. ; Rhee, Peter. / The physiological effects of hyperosmolar resuscitation : 5% vs 3% hypertonic saline. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 208, No. 5. pp. 697-702.
@article{7b9caca9eccb45fca25d0afd5da44a64,
title = "The physiological effects of hyperosmolar resuscitation: 5{\%} vs 3{\%} hypertonic saline",
abstract = "Background Use of 5{\%} normal saline (NS) is gaining renewed interest. The primary aim of our study was to compare the physiological effects after the administration of different concentrations of hypertonic saline (3{\%} vs 5{\%}NS) in the initial resuscitation of trauma.Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of all trauma patients who received hypertonic saline during initial resuscitation. Medical records were reviewed for serum electrolytes and serum osmolarity, coagulation parameters, complications, and mortality.Conclusions The 5{\%}NS has sustained higher serum osmolarity and serum sodium concentration within the first 72 hours without any increase in adverse effects in comparison with 3{\%}NS.Results A total of 212 patients were included in the study, of which 170 patients received 5{\%}NS and 42 patients received 3{\%}NS. Both groups were similar in age (41.16 ± 19 vs 44.17 + 23.6; P =.45) and ISS score (26 [17 to 29] vs 25 [16 to 27]; P =.6). Mean serum osmolarity (316 ± 20.3 vs 294 ± 22.5; P =.02) and serum sodium levels (143 ± 8.6 vs 137 ± 10.9; P <.001) remained higher in the 5{\%}NS group within 72 hours of admission. The pH was lower in the 5{\%}NS group compared with the 3{\%}NS group at 24 hours (7.29 ±.12 vs 7.33 ±.12; P =.01); however, at 48 and 72 hours (7.40 ±.07 vs 7.41 ±.07; P =.7), no difference was found. There was no difference in blood products requirement (1,734 vs 2,253 mL; P =.11) between the 2 groups.",
keywords = "5{\%} Normal saline, Complications, Hypertonic saline, Physiological effects, Serum sodium",
author = "Bellal Joseph and Hassan Aziz and Margeaux Snell and Viraj Pandit and Daniel Hays and Narong Kulvatunyou and Andrew Tang and Terence OKeeffe and Julie Wynne and Friese, {Randall S.} and Peter Rhee",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.01.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "208",
pages = "697--702",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The physiological effects of hyperosmolar resuscitation

T2 - 5% vs 3% hypertonic saline

AU - Joseph, Bellal

AU - Aziz, Hassan

AU - Snell, Margeaux

AU - Pandit, Viraj

AU - Hays, Daniel

AU - Kulvatunyou, Narong

AU - Tang, Andrew

AU - OKeeffe, Terence

AU - Wynne, Julie

AU - Friese, Randall S.

AU - Rhee, Peter

PY - 2014/11/1

Y1 - 2014/11/1

N2 - Background Use of 5% normal saline (NS) is gaining renewed interest. The primary aim of our study was to compare the physiological effects after the administration of different concentrations of hypertonic saline (3% vs 5%NS) in the initial resuscitation of trauma.Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of all trauma patients who received hypertonic saline during initial resuscitation. Medical records were reviewed for serum electrolytes and serum osmolarity, coagulation parameters, complications, and mortality.Conclusions The 5%NS has sustained higher serum osmolarity and serum sodium concentration within the first 72 hours without any increase in adverse effects in comparison with 3%NS.Results A total of 212 patients were included in the study, of which 170 patients received 5%NS and 42 patients received 3%NS. Both groups were similar in age (41.16 ± 19 vs 44.17 + 23.6; P =.45) and ISS score (26 [17 to 29] vs 25 [16 to 27]; P =.6). Mean serum osmolarity (316 ± 20.3 vs 294 ± 22.5; P =.02) and serum sodium levels (143 ± 8.6 vs 137 ± 10.9; P <.001) remained higher in the 5%NS group within 72 hours of admission. The pH was lower in the 5%NS group compared with the 3%NS group at 24 hours (7.29 ±.12 vs 7.33 ±.12; P =.01); however, at 48 and 72 hours (7.40 ±.07 vs 7.41 ±.07; P =.7), no difference was found. There was no difference in blood products requirement (1,734 vs 2,253 mL; P =.11) between the 2 groups.

AB - Background Use of 5% normal saline (NS) is gaining renewed interest. The primary aim of our study was to compare the physiological effects after the administration of different concentrations of hypertonic saline (3% vs 5%NS) in the initial resuscitation of trauma.Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of all trauma patients who received hypertonic saline during initial resuscitation. Medical records were reviewed for serum electrolytes and serum osmolarity, coagulation parameters, complications, and mortality.Conclusions The 5%NS has sustained higher serum osmolarity and serum sodium concentration within the first 72 hours without any increase in adverse effects in comparison with 3%NS.Results A total of 212 patients were included in the study, of which 170 patients received 5%NS and 42 patients received 3%NS. Both groups were similar in age (41.16 ± 19 vs 44.17 + 23.6; P =.45) and ISS score (26 [17 to 29] vs 25 [16 to 27]; P =.6). Mean serum osmolarity (316 ± 20.3 vs 294 ± 22.5; P =.02) and serum sodium levels (143 ± 8.6 vs 137 ± 10.9; P <.001) remained higher in the 5%NS group within 72 hours of admission. The pH was lower in the 5%NS group compared with the 3%NS group at 24 hours (7.29 ±.12 vs 7.33 ±.12; P =.01); however, at 48 and 72 hours (7.40 ±.07 vs 7.41 ±.07; P =.7), no difference was found. There was no difference in blood products requirement (1,734 vs 2,253 mL; P =.11) between the 2 groups.

KW - 5% Normal saline

KW - Complications

KW - Hypertonic saline

KW - Physiological effects

KW - Serum sodium

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911387023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911387023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.01.009

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.01.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 24928332

AN - SCOPUS:84911387023

VL - 208

SP - 697

EP - 702

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 5

ER -