The practicality of using the SMAST and AUDIT to screen for alcoholism among adolescents in an urban private family practice.

A. I. Foster, R. D. Blondell, Stephen Warwick Looney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We assessed the practicality of using the Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST) and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in screening adolescents for alcoholism in a primary care setting. In addition, we sought to determine the prevalence of alcohol use among adolescents, 16-21 years of age, presenting to a private Family Medicine practice for medical care. A consecutive sample of 67 subjects presenting for medical care were asked to complete the SMAST and AUDIT questionnaires. Overall, 52 (78%) of the questionnaires were returned with complete data. Of the 52 patients, 25 (48%) admitted to drinking. Using a "positive" score on either the SMAST or AUDIT as a positive test for alcohol use yielded a sensitivity of 40% and a predictive value positive of 100%. Using a "negative" score on both the SMAST and AUDIT as a negative test for alcohol use yielded a specificity of 100% and a predictive value negative of 64%. Although alcohol use was relatively common considering the age group, using the SMAST and AUDIT to screen for alcoholism is labor intensive and is not practical in this situation. Because patients appeared to misinterpret some questions and were often accompanied to the office by their parents, their answers may not be valid. History of alcoholism taken upon typical office examination and relevant advice appears to be a better alternative to the use of questionnaires in determining the prevalence of alcohol use in this age group.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-107
Number of pages3
JournalThe Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association
Volume95
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Family Practice
Private Practice
Alcoholism
Alcohols
Age Groups
Drinking
Primary Health Care
Parents
Medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The practicality of using the SMAST and AUDIT to screen for alcoholism among adolescents in an urban private family practice. / Foster, A. I.; Blondell, R. D.; Looney, Stephen Warwick.

In: The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association, Vol. 95, No. 3, 01.01.1997, p. 105-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6de51710bd384935a2c69c3f9377d212,
title = "The practicality of using the SMAST and AUDIT to screen for alcoholism among adolescents in an urban private family practice.",
abstract = "We assessed the practicality of using the Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST) and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in screening adolescents for alcoholism in a primary care setting. In addition, we sought to determine the prevalence of alcohol use among adolescents, 16-21 years of age, presenting to a private Family Medicine practice for medical care. A consecutive sample of 67 subjects presenting for medical care were asked to complete the SMAST and AUDIT questionnaires. Overall, 52 (78{\%}) of the questionnaires were returned with complete data. Of the 52 patients, 25 (48{\%}) admitted to drinking. Using a {"}positive{"} score on either the SMAST or AUDIT as a positive test for alcohol use yielded a sensitivity of 40{\%} and a predictive value positive of 100{\%}. Using a {"}negative{"} score on both the SMAST and AUDIT as a negative test for alcohol use yielded a specificity of 100{\%} and a predictive value negative of 64{\%}. Although alcohol use was relatively common considering the age group, using the SMAST and AUDIT to screen for alcoholism is labor intensive and is not practical in this situation. Because patients appeared to misinterpret some questions and were often accompanied to the office by their parents, their answers may not be valid. History of alcoholism taken upon typical office examination and relevant advice appears to be a better alternative to the use of questionnaires in determining the prevalence of alcohol use in this age group.",
author = "Foster, {A. I.} and Blondell, {R. D.} and Looney, {Stephen Warwick}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "105--107",
journal = "The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association",
issn = "0023-0294",
publisher = "Kentucky Medical Association",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The practicality of using the SMAST and AUDIT to screen for alcoholism among adolescents in an urban private family practice.

AU - Foster, A. I.

AU - Blondell, R. D.

AU - Looney, Stephen Warwick

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - We assessed the practicality of using the Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST) and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in screening adolescents for alcoholism in a primary care setting. In addition, we sought to determine the prevalence of alcohol use among adolescents, 16-21 years of age, presenting to a private Family Medicine practice for medical care. A consecutive sample of 67 subjects presenting for medical care were asked to complete the SMAST and AUDIT questionnaires. Overall, 52 (78%) of the questionnaires were returned with complete data. Of the 52 patients, 25 (48%) admitted to drinking. Using a "positive" score on either the SMAST or AUDIT as a positive test for alcohol use yielded a sensitivity of 40% and a predictive value positive of 100%. Using a "negative" score on both the SMAST and AUDIT as a negative test for alcohol use yielded a specificity of 100% and a predictive value negative of 64%. Although alcohol use was relatively common considering the age group, using the SMAST and AUDIT to screen for alcoholism is labor intensive and is not practical in this situation. Because patients appeared to misinterpret some questions and were often accompanied to the office by their parents, their answers may not be valid. History of alcoholism taken upon typical office examination and relevant advice appears to be a better alternative to the use of questionnaires in determining the prevalence of alcohol use in this age group.

AB - We assessed the practicality of using the Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST) and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in screening adolescents for alcoholism in a primary care setting. In addition, we sought to determine the prevalence of alcohol use among adolescents, 16-21 years of age, presenting to a private Family Medicine practice for medical care. A consecutive sample of 67 subjects presenting for medical care were asked to complete the SMAST and AUDIT questionnaires. Overall, 52 (78%) of the questionnaires were returned with complete data. Of the 52 patients, 25 (48%) admitted to drinking. Using a "positive" score on either the SMAST or AUDIT as a positive test for alcohol use yielded a sensitivity of 40% and a predictive value positive of 100%. Using a "negative" score on both the SMAST and AUDIT as a negative test for alcohol use yielded a specificity of 100% and a predictive value negative of 64%. Although alcohol use was relatively common considering the age group, using the SMAST and AUDIT to screen for alcoholism is labor intensive and is not practical in this situation. Because patients appeared to misinterpret some questions and were often accompanied to the office by their parents, their answers may not be valid. History of alcoholism taken upon typical office examination and relevant advice appears to be a better alternative to the use of questionnaires in determining the prevalence of alcohol use in this age group.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031092314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031092314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9071854

AN - SCOPUS:0031092314

VL - 95

SP - 105

EP - 107

JO - The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association

JF - The Journal of the Kentucky Medical Association

SN - 0023-0294

IS - 3

ER -