The practice of evidence-based medicine involves the care of whole persons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this issue of the Journal, Dr. Fava posits that evidence-based medicine (EBM) was bound to fail. I share some of the concerns he expresses, yet I see more reasons for optimism. Having been on rounds with both Drs. Engel and Sackett, I reckon they would have agreed more than they disagreed. Their central teaching was the compassionate and well-informed care of sick persons. The model that emerged from these rounds was that patient care could be both person-centered and evidence-based, that clinical judgment was essential to both, and the decisions could and should be shared. Both clinicians and patients can bring knowledge from several sources into the shared decision making process in the clinical encounter, including evidence from clinical care research. I thank Dr. Fava for expressing legitimate doubts and providing useful criticism, yet I am cautiously optimistic that the model of EBM described here is robust enough to meet the challenges and is not doomed to fail.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)18-21
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume84
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Medicine
Decision Making
Patient Care
Teaching
Research
Optimism

Keywords

  • Care of whole persons
  • Evidence-based medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

The practice of evidence-based medicine involves the care of whole persons. / Richardson, Scott.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 84, 01.04.2017, p. 18-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e43d4c03b66c4307a2e0746d87276c64,
title = "The practice of evidence-based medicine involves the care of whole persons",
abstract = "In this issue of the Journal, Dr. Fava posits that evidence-based medicine (EBM) was bound to fail. I share some of the concerns he expresses, yet I see more reasons for optimism. Having been on rounds with both Drs. Engel and Sackett, I reckon they would have agreed more than they disagreed. Their central teaching was the compassionate and well-informed care of sick persons. The model that emerged from these rounds was that patient care could be both person-centered and evidence-based, that clinical judgment was essential to both, and the decisions could and should be shared. Both clinicians and patients can bring knowledge from several sources into the shared decision making process in the clinical encounter, including evidence from clinical care research. I thank Dr. Fava for expressing legitimate doubts and providing useful criticism, yet I am cautiously optimistic that the model of EBM described here is robust enough to meet the challenges and is not doomed to fail.",
keywords = "Care of whole persons, Evidence-based medicine",
author = "Scott Richardson",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "18--21",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The practice of evidence-based medicine involves the care of whole persons

AU - Richardson, Scott

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - In this issue of the Journal, Dr. Fava posits that evidence-based medicine (EBM) was bound to fail. I share some of the concerns he expresses, yet I see more reasons for optimism. Having been on rounds with both Drs. Engel and Sackett, I reckon they would have agreed more than they disagreed. Their central teaching was the compassionate and well-informed care of sick persons. The model that emerged from these rounds was that patient care could be both person-centered and evidence-based, that clinical judgment was essential to both, and the decisions could and should be shared. Both clinicians and patients can bring knowledge from several sources into the shared decision making process in the clinical encounter, including evidence from clinical care research. I thank Dr. Fava for expressing legitimate doubts and providing useful criticism, yet I am cautiously optimistic that the model of EBM described here is robust enough to meet the challenges and is not doomed to fail.

AB - In this issue of the Journal, Dr. Fava posits that evidence-based medicine (EBM) was bound to fail. I share some of the concerns he expresses, yet I see more reasons for optimism. Having been on rounds with both Drs. Engel and Sackett, I reckon they would have agreed more than they disagreed. Their central teaching was the compassionate and well-informed care of sick persons. The model that emerged from these rounds was that patient care could be both person-centered and evidence-based, that clinical judgment was essential to both, and the decisions could and should be shared. Both clinicians and patients can bring knowledge from several sources into the shared decision making process in the clinical encounter, including evidence from clinical care research. I thank Dr. Fava for expressing legitimate doubts and providing useful criticism, yet I am cautiously optimistic that the model of EBM described here is robust enough to meet the challenges and is not doomed to fail.

KW - Care of whole persons

KW - Evidence-based medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019900001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019900001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 28532613

AN - SCOPUS:85019900001

VL - 84

SP - 18

EP - 21

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

ER -