The price of doing pediatric sinus procedures (a look at cost)

Brian Ho, Robert Liebman, C. Anthony Hughes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Display the cost savings of minimal sterile covers and preparatory time while still maintaining optimal outcomes for sinus procedures.In-office non-sterile endoscopic sinus procedures have not shown a difference in infections and complications. Institutions continue to employ more "traditional" sterile preparation with similar procedures in the operating room. Multiple studies have also shown no significant difference in postoperative course when preoperative antibiotics are administered for sinus procedures. Methods: Endoscopic sinus procedures were selected (58 patients) to analyze itemized sterile costs. Drapes, gloves, gowns, and antibiotics were then tallied and compared to the same items for cochlear implants (14 procedures). The "sterile-prep" time was also analyzed and compared between the two procedures. Cost difference was analyzed. Results: Comparing the supplies used for sinus procedures (56) and cochlear implants, our average sinus cost was $10.19, compared to $34.64, with a difference of $24.45. This equated to a savings of $1418.00 in sinus procedure supplies that year. The difference in draping and scrubbing time showed a difference of 20. min between groups, equaling a value of $1760 difference/case. This calculated to a savings of $10,2080 for sinus operating room time. There was no difference in patient outcomes with this surgical preparatory approach. Conclusion: Our analysis showed a large cost savings over a fiscal year in operative time and supplies. This did not compromise any patient outcomes given the already non-sterile nature of endoscopic sinus surgery. This practice can be adopted to greatly enhance efficiency without sacrificing surgical results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1639-1642
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Volume77
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2013

Fingerprint

Pediatrics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cochlear Implants
Cost Savings
Operating Rooms
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Operative Time
Infection

Keywords

  • Cochlear implant
  • Cost analysis
  • Functional endoscopic sinus surgery
  • Preoperative antibiotics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

The price of doing pediatric sinus procedures (a look at cost). / Ho, Brian; Liebman, Robert; Hughes, C. Anthony.

In: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Vol. 77, No. 10, 01.10.2013, p. 1639-1642.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ho, Brian ; Liebman, Robert ; Hughes, C. Anthony. / The price of doing pediatric sinus procedures (a look at cost). In: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 2013 ; Vol. 77, No. 10. pp. 1639-1642.
@article{e54dc573548742409be5bd90900058aa,
title = "The price of doing pediatric sinus procedures (a look at cost)",
abstract = "Objective: Display the cost savings of minimal sterile covers and preparatory time while still maintaining optimal outcomes for sinus procedures.In-office non-sterile endoscopic sinus procedures have not shown a difference in infections and complications. Institutions continue to employ more {"}traditional{"} sterile preparation with similar procedures in the operating room. Multiple studies have also shown no significant difference in postoperative course when preoperative antibiotics are administered for sinus procedures. Methods: Endoscopic sinus procedures were selected (58 patients) to analyze itemized sterile costs. Drapes, gloves, gowns, and antibiotics were then tallied and compared to the same items for cochlear implants (14 procedures). The {"}sterile-prep{"} time was also analyzed and compared between the two procedures. Cost difference was analyzed. Results: Comparing the supplies used for sinus procedures (56) and cochlear implants, our average sinus cost was $10.19, compared to $34.64, with a difference of $24.45. This equated to a savings of $1418.00 in sinus procedure supplies that year. The difference in draping and scrubbing time showed a difference of 20. min between groups, equaling a value of $1760 difference/case. This calculated to a savings of $10,2080 for sinus operating room time. There was no difference in patient outcomes with this surgical preparatory approach. Conclusion: Our analysis showed a large cost savings over a fiscal year in operative time and supplies. This did not compromise any patient outcomes given the already non-sterile nature of endoscopic sinus surgery. This practice can be adopted to greatly enhance efficiency without sacrificing surgical results.",
keywords = "Cochlear implant, Cost analysis, Functional endoscopic sinus surgery, Preoperative antibiotics",
author = "Brian Ho and Robert Liebman and Hughes, {C. Anthony}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.07.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "1639--1642",
journal = "International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology",
issn = "0165-5876",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The price of doing pediatric sinus procedures (a look at cost)

AU - Ho, Brian

AU - Liebman, Robert

AU - Hughes, C. Anthony

PY - 2013/10/1

Y1 - 2013/10/1

N2 - Objective: Display the cost savings of minimal sterile covers and preparatory time while still maintaining optimal outcomes for sinus procedures.In-office non-sterile endoscopic sinus procedures have not shown a difference in infections and complications. Institutions continue to employ more "traditional" sterile preparation with similar procedures in the operating room. Multiple studies have also shown no significant difference in postoperative course when preoperative antibiotics are administered for sinus procedures. Methods: Endoscopic sinus procedures were selected (58 patients) to analyze itemized sterile costs. Drapes, gloves, gowns, and antibiotics were then tallied and compared to the same items for cochlear implants (14 procedures). The "sterile-prep" time was also analyzed and compared between the two procedures. Cost difference was analyzed. Results: Comparing the supplies used for sinus procedures (56) and cochlear implants, our average sinus cost was $10.19, compared to $34.64, with a difference of $24.45. This equated to a savings of $1418.00 in sinus procedure supplies that year. The difference in draping and scrubbing time showed a difference of 20. min between groups, equaling a value of $1760 difference/case. This calculated to a savings of $10,2080 for sinus operating room time. There was no difference in patient outcomes with this surgical preparatory approach. Conclusion: Our analysis showed a large cost savings over a fiscal year in operative time and supplies. This did not compromise any patient outcomes given the already non-sterile nature of endoscopic sinus surgery. This practice can be adopted to greatly enhance efficiency without sacrificing surgical results.

AB - Objective: Display the cost savings of minimal sterile covers and preparatory time while still maintaining optimal outcomes for sinus procedures.In-office non-sterile endoscopic sinus procedures have not shown a difference in infections and complications. Institutions continue to employ more "traditional" sterile preparation with similar procedures in the operating room. Multiple studies have also shown no significant difference in postoperative course when preoperative antibiotics are administered for sinus procedures. Methods: Endoscopic sinus procedures were selected (58 patients) to analyze itemized sterile costs. Drapes, gloves, gowns, and antibiotics were then tallied and compared to the same items for cochlear implants (14 procedures). The "sterile-prep" time was also analyzed and compared between the two procedures. Cost difference was analyzed. Results: Comparing the supplies used for sinus procedures (56) and cochlear implants, our average sinus cost was $10.19, compared to $34.64, with a difference of $24.45. This equated to a savings of $1418.00 in sinus procedure supplies that year. The difference in draping and scrubbing time showed a difference of 20. min between groups, equaling a value of $1760 difference/case. This calculated to a savings of $10,2080 for sinus operating room time. There was no difference in patient outcomes with this surgical preparatory approach. Conclusion: Our analysis showed a large cost savings over a fiscal year in operative time and supplies. This did not compromise any patient outcomes given the already non-sterile nature of endoscopic sinus surgery. This practice can be adopted to greatly enhance efficiency without sacrificing surgical results.

KW - Cochlear implant

KW - Cost analysis

KW - Functional endoscopic sinus surgery

KW - Preoperative antibiotics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884281051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884281051&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.07.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.07.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 23947997

AN - SCOPUS:84884281051

VL - 77

SP - 1639

EP - 1642

JO - International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

JF - International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

SN - 0165-5876

IS - 10

ER -