The public value of nanotechnology?

Erik Fisher, Catherine P. Slade, Derrick Anderson, Barry Bozeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Science and innovation policy (SIP) is typically justified in terms of public values while SIP program assessments are typically limited to economic terms that imperfectly take into account these values. The study of public values through public value mapping (PVM) lacks widely-accepted methods for systematically identifying value structures within SIP and its public policy processes, especially when there are multiple stakeholder groups. This paper advances the study of public values in SIP using nanoscale science and engineering (NSE) policy by demonstrating that quantitative analysis of value statements can provide a credible and robust basis for policy analysis. We use content analysis of over 1,000 documents with over 100,000 pages from major contributors to the NSE policy discourse to identify and analyze a wide range of public value statements. Data analysis and reduction methods reveal a multifactor structure of public values that has been consistently cited by a range of actors in an NSE research policy network.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-39
Number of pages11
JournalScientometrics
Volume85
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

nanotechnology
Nanotechnology
Innovation
innovation policy
science policy
Values
Engineering research
engineering
Data reduction
science
Economics
Chemical analysis
research policy
content analysis
data analysis
public policy
stakeholder
discourse
lack

Keywords

  • Nanotechnology
  • Public policy analysis
  • Public values
  • Science and technology policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

The public value of nanotechnology? / Fisher, Erik; Slade, Catherine P.; Anderson, Derrick; Bozeman, Barry.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 85, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 29-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fisher, E, Slade, CP, Anderson, D & Bozeman, B 2010, 'The public value of nanotechnology?', Scientometrics, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0237-1
Fisher, Erik ; Slade, Catherine P. ; Anderson, Derrick ; Bozeman, Barry. / The public value of nanotechnology?. In: Scientometrics. 2010 ; Vol. 85, No. 1. pp. 29-39.
@article{dae0fd0331374f6986dcc72d4fba1b73,
title = "The public value of nanotechnology?",
abstract = "Science and innovation policy (SIP) is typically justified in terms of public values while SIP program assessments are typically limited to economic terms that imperfectly take into account these values. The study of public values through public value mapping (PVM) lacks widely-accepted methods for systematically identifying value structures within SIP and its public policy processes, especially when there are multiple stakeholder groups. This paper advances the study of public values in SIP using nanoscale science and engineering (NSE) policy by demonstrating that quantitative analysis of value statements can provide a credible and robust basis for policy analysis. We use content analysis of over 1,000 documents with over 100,000 pages from major contributors to the NSE policy discourse to identify and analyze a wide range of public value statements. Data analysis and reduction methods reveal a multifactor structure of public values that has been consistently cited by a range of actors in an NSE research policy network.",
keywords = "Nanotechnology, Public policy analysis, Public values, Science and technology policy",
author = "Erik Fisher and Slade, {Catherine P.} and Derrick Anderson and Barry Bozeman",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-010-0237-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "85",
pages = "29--39",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The public value of nanotechnology?

AU - Fisher, Erik

AU - Slade, Catherine P.

AU - Anderson, Derrick

AU - Bozeman, Barry

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Science and innovation policy (SIP) is typically justified in terms of public values while SIP program assessments are typically limited to economic terms that imperfectly take into account these values. The study of public values through public value mapping (PVM) lacks widely-accepted methods for systematically identifying value structures within SIP and its public policy processes, especially when there are multiple stakeholder groups. This paper advances the study of public values in SIP using nanoscale science and engineering (NSE) policy by demonstrating that quantitative analysis of value statements can provide a credible and robust basis for policy analysis. We use content analysis of over 1,000 documents with over 100,000 pages from major contributors to the NSE policy discourse to identify and analyze a wide range of public value statements. Data analysis and reduction methods reveal a multifactor structure of public values that has been consistently cited by a range of actors in an NSE research policy network.

AB - Science and innovation policy (SIP) is typically justified in terms of public values while SIP program assessments are typically limited to economic terms that imperfectly take into account these values. The study of public values through public value mapping (PVM) lacks widely-accepted methods for systematically identifying value structures within SIP and its public policy processes, especially when there are multiple stakeholder groups. This paper advances the study of public values in SIP using nanoscale science and engineering (NSE) policy by demonstrating that quantitative analysis of value statements can provide a credible and robust basis for policy analysis. We use content analysis of over 1,000 documents with over 100,000 pages from major contributors to the NSE policy discourse to identify and analyze a wide range of public value statements. Data analysis and reduction methods reveal a multifactor structure of public values that has been consistently cited by a range of actors in an NSE research policy network.

KW - Nanotechnology

KW - Public policy analysis

KW - Public values

KW - Science and technology policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955842838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955842838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-010-0237-1

DO - 10.1007/s11192-010-0237-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77955842838

VL - 85

SP - 29

EP - 39

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 1

ER -