The reproducibility of the allergy skin test scoring and interpretation by board-certified/board-eligible allergists

William A. McCann, Dennis Randall Ownby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Allergy skin testing is a cornerstone in the evaluation of the allergic patient. This seemingly simple test is subject to multiple variables that can affect the result. Objective: To evaluate the degree of variability among board-certified/board-eligible allergists in the scoring and interpretation of allergen skin tests. Materials and Methods: A series of allergen prick skin tests were digitally photographed and a questionnaire generated. Approximately 70 board-certified/board-eligible allergists were asked to grade each test item and to interpret them as positive, negative, or indeterminate or if they desired a followup intradermal test. Results: Thirty-three interpretable responses were obtained. The majority of respondents (24) used a grading scale of 0 to 4. Agreement among physicians using a 0 to 4+ scale ranged from a standard deviation of 0.26 to 1.35, with greatest agreement on items with median/mode scores of 4+. The largest standard deviations were found on test items with median/mode scores of 1 + to 2+. Interpretation of the test items also showed greatest variation for those items with median/mode scores of 1+ to 2+. The number of intradermal tests requested ranged from 0 to 11 (of 22 test items). Conclusions: The results demonstrate interphysician variation in the scoring and interpretation of epicutaneous skin tests. A questionnaire such as the one used here may serve a useful quality control instrument to ensure reproducible scoring of skin tests. In addition, the results highlight the need for greater study on the clinical utility of intradermal skin testing when epicutaneous tests are negative or equivocal.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)368-371
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
Volume89
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2002

Fingerprint

Skin Tests
Hypersensitivity
Intradermal Tests
Allergens
Skin
Quality Control
Physicians
Allergists
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

The reproducibility of the allergy skin test scoring and interpretation by board-certified/board-eligible allergists. / McCann, William A.; Ownby, Dennis Randall.

In: Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Vol. 89, No. 4, 01.10.2002, p. 368-371.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d4591829c67c4c92bd7df30d42574656,
title = "The reproducibility of the allergy skin test scoring and interpretation by board-certified/board-eligible allergists",
abstract = "Background: Allergy skin testing is a cornerstone in the evaluation of the allergic patient. This seemingly simple test is subject to multiple variables that can affect the result. Objective: To evaluate the degree of variability among board-certified/board-eligible allergists in the scoring and interpretation of allergen skin tests. Materials and Methods: A series of allergen prick skin tests were digitally photographed and a questionnaire generated. Approximately 70 board-certified/board-eligible allergists were asked to grade each test item and to interpret them as positive, negative, or indeterminate or if they desired a followup intradermal test. Results: Thirty-three interpretable responses were obtained. The majority of respondents (24) used a grading scale of 0 to 4. Agreement among physicians using a 0 to 4+ scale ranged from a standard deviation of 0.26 to 1.35, with greatest agreement on items with median/mode scores of 4+. The largest standard deviations were found on test items with median/mode scores of 1 + to 2+. Interpretation of the test items also showed greatest variation for those items with median/mode scores of 1+ to 2+. The number of intradermal tests requested ranged from 0 to 11 (of 22 test items). Conclusions: The results demonstrate interphysician variation in the scoring and interpretation of epicutaneous skin tests. A questionnaire such as the one used here may serve a useful quality control instrument to ensure reproducible scoring of skin tests. In addition, the results highlight the need for greater study on the clinical utility of intradermal skin testing when epicutaneous tests are negative or equivocal.",
author = "McCann, {William A.} and Ownby, {Dennis Randall}",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62037-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "368--371",
journal = "Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology",
issn = "1081-1206",
publisher = "American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The reproducibility of the allergy skin test scoring and interpretation by board-certified/board-eligible allergists

AU - McCann, William A.

AU - Ownby, Dennis Randall

PY - 2002/10/1

Y1 - 2002/10/1

N2 - Background: Allergy skin testing is a cornerstone in the evaluation of the allergic patient. This seemingly simple test is subject to multiple variables that can affect the result. Objective: To evaluate the degree of variability among board-certified/board-eligible allergists in the scoring and interpretation of allergen skin tests. Materials and Methods: A series of allergen prick skin tests were digitally photographed and a questionnaire generated. Approximately 70 board-certified/board-eligible allergists were asked to grade each test item and to interpret them as positive, negative, or indeterminate or if they desired a followup intradermal test. Results: Thirty-three interpretable responses were obtained. The majority of respondents (24) used a grading scale of 0 to 4. Agreement among physicians using a 0 to 4+ scale ranged from a standard deviation of 0.26 to 1.35, with greatest agreement on items with median/mode scores of 4+. The largest standard deviations were found on test items with median/mode scores of 1 + to 2+. Interpretation of the test items also showed greatest variation for those items with median/mode scores of 1+ to 2+. The number of intradermal tests requested ranged from 0 to 11 (of 22 test items). Conclusions: The results demonstrate interphysician variation in the scoring and interpretation of epicutaneous skin tests. A questionnaire such as the one used here may serve a useful quality control instrument to ensure reproducible scoring of skin tests. In addition, the results highlight the need for greater study on the clinical utility of intradermal skin testing when epicutaneous tests are negative or equivocal.

AB - Background: Allergy skin testing is a cornerstone in the evaluation of the allergic patient. This seemingly simple test is subject to multiple variables that can affect the result. Objective: To evaluate the degree of variability among board-certified/board-eligible allergists in the scoring and interpretation of allergen skin tests. Materials and Methods: A series of allergen prick skin tests were digitally photographed and a questionnaire generated. Approximately 70 board-certified/board-eligible allergists were asked to grade each test item and to interpret them as positive, negative, or indeterminate or if they desired a followup intradermal test. Results: Thirty-three interpretable responses were obtained. The majority of respondents (24) used a grading scale of 0 to 4. Agreement among physicians using a 0 to 4+ scale ranged from a standard deviation of 0.26 to 1.35, with greatest agreement on items with median/mode scores of 4+. The largest standard deviations were found on test items with median/mode scores of 1 + to 2+. Interpretation of the test items also showed greatest variation for those items with median/mode scores of 1+ to 2+. The number of intradermal tests requested ranged from 0 to 11 (of 22 test items). Conclusions: The results demonstrate interphysician variation in the scoring and interpretation of epicutaneous skin tests. A questionnaire such as the one used here may serve a useful quality control instrument to ensure reproducible scoring of skin tests. In addition, the results highlight the need for greater study on the clinical utility of intradermal skin testing when epicutaneous tests are negative or equivocal.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036824531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036824531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62037-6

DO - 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62037-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 12392380

AN - SCOPUS:0036824531

VL - 89

SP - 368

EP - 371

JO - Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology

JF - Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology

SN - 1081-1206

IS - 4

ER -