The strength of multiple major connector designs under simulated functional loading

Todd E. Pienkos, W. Jack Morris, Peter M. Gronet, Stephen M. Cameron, Stephen Warwick Looney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Statement of problem: The design of a removable dental prosthesis (RDP) must balance functional strength, comfort to the patient, and the health of the tissue. While research has been conducted to enhance the strength of major connectors, little has been done to determine if the dimensions of major connectors can be reduced in order to enhance patient comfort and tissue health. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the minimum major connector dimensions of 1 mandibular and 2 maxillary major connectors that would provide adequate functional strength. Material and methods: Sixty chromium-cobalt alloy (Vitallium) RDP frameworks were fabricated. The major connector designs were: a mandibular lingual bar, a maxillary palatal strap, and a maxillary anterior-posterior (A-P) palatal strap. Four groups of 5 frameworks with diminishing dimensions were fabricated for each major connector design. The lingual bar was tested at 4, 3, 2.5, and 2 mm in height, occlusogingivally, and 1.6 mm in thickness; the palatal strap at 8, 6, 4, and 2 mm, anteroposteriorly; and the A-P palatal strap at 10 × 6, 8 × 4, 6 × 2.5, and 4 × 2 mm, anteroposteriorly. All maxillary frameworks were 0.65 mm in thickness. The frameworks were of a Kennedy Class II Mod I design with 3 widely separated vertical reference points to measure deformation. Two tests were conducted to evaluate the functional strength for each framework. The first test was masticatory simulation, or torsional force. The second test was a drop test from a height of 3 feet. Permanent deformation was then determined after each test. The Cochran-Armitage test (α=.05) was used for both the torsion test and the drop test. Results: A statistically significant difference in permanent deformation was found for the palatal strap design among the 4 different dimensions for the compressive test (P=.015) and the drop test (P=.044). Conclusion: It is safe to reduce the dimensions of some major connectors under normal loads. The reduced size of the connectors places the removable partial denture at increased risk for deformation when dropped from a height.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)299-304
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume97
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2007

Fingerprint

Dental Prosthesis
Tongue
Mechanical Torsion
Vitallium
Chromium Alloys
Bite Force
Removable Partial Denture
Health
Research
Patient Comfort

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

The strength of multiple major connector designs under simulated functional loading. / Pienkos, Todd E.; Morris, W. Jack; Gronet, Peter M.; Cameron, Stephen M.; Looney, Stephen Warwick.

In: Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Vol. 97, No. 5, 01.05.2007, p. 299-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pienkos, Todd E. ; Morris, W. Jack ; Gronet, Peter M. ; Cameron, Stephen M. ; Looney, Stephen Warwick. / The strength of multiple major connector designs under simulated functional loading. In: Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2007 ; Vol. 97, No. 5. pp. 299-304.
@article{1c7bc9db355c4d14b34c76da99a50d6d,
title = "The strength of multiple major connector designs under simulated functional loading",
abstract = "Statement of problem: The design of a removable dental prosthesis (RDP) must balance functional strength, comfort to the patient, and the health of the tissue. While research has been conducted to enhance the strength of major connectors, little has been done to determine if the dimensions of major connectors can be reduced in order to enhance patient comfort and tissue health. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the minimum major connector dimensions of 1 mandibular and 2 maxillary major connectors that would provide adequate functional strength. Material and methods: Sixty chromium-cobalt alloy (Vitallium) RDP frameworks were fabricated. The major connector designs were: a mandibular lingual bar, a maxillary palatal strap, and a maxillary anterior-posterior (A-P) palatal strap. Four groups of 5 frameworks with diminishing dimensions were fabricated for each major connector design. The lingual bar was tested at 4, 3, 2.5, and 2 mm in height, occlusogingivally, and 1.6 mm in thickness; the palatal strap at 8, 6, 4, and 2 mm, anteroposteriorly; and the A-P palatal strap at 10 × 6, 8 × 4, 6 × 2.5, and 4 × 2 mm, anteroposteriorly. All maxillary frameworks were 0.65 mm in thickness. The frameworks were of a Kennedy Class II Mod I design with 3 widely separated vertical reference points to measure deformation. Two tests were conducted to evaluate the functional strength for each framework. The first test was masticatory simulation, or torsional force. The second test was a drop test from a height of 3 feet. Permanent deformation was then determined after each test. The Cochran-Armitage test (α=.05) was used for both the torsion test and the drop test. Results: A statistically significant difference in permanent deformation was found for the palatal strap design among the 4 different dimensions for the compressive test (P=.015) and the drop test (P=.044). Conclusion: It is safe to reduce the dimensions of some major connectors under normal loads. The reduced size of the connectors places the removable partial denture at increased risk for deformation when dropped from a height.",
author = "Pienkos, {Todd E.} and Morris, {W. Jack} and Gronet, {Peter M.} and Cameron, {Stephen M.} and Looney, {Stephen Warwick}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.04.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "299--304",
journal = "Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry",
issn = "0022-3913",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The strength of multiple major connector designs under simulated functional loading

AU - Pienkos, Todd E.

AU - Morris, W. Jack

AU - Gronet, Peter M.

AU - Cameron, Stephen M.

AU - Looney, Stephen Warwick

PY - 2007/5/1

Y1 - 2007/5/1

N2 - Statement of problem: The design of a removable dental prosthesis (RDP) must balance functional strength, comfort to the patient, and the health of the tissue. While research has been conducted to enhance the strength of major connectors, little has been done to determine if the dimensions of major connectors can be reduced in order to enhance patient comfort and tissue health. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the minimum major connector dimensions of 1 mandibular and 2 maxillary major connectors that would provide adequate functional strength. Material and methods: Sixty chromium-cobalt alloy (Vitallium) RDP frameworks were fabricated. The major connector designs were: a mandibular lingual bar, a maxillary palatal strap, and a maxillary anterior-posterior (A-P) palatal strap. Four groups of 5 frameworks with diminishing dimensions were fabricated for each major connector design. The lingual bar was tested at 4, 3, 2.5, and 2 mm in height, occlusogingivally, and 1.6 mm in thickness; the palatal strap at 8, 6, 4, and 2 mm, anteroposteriorly; and the A-P palatal strap at 10 × 6, 8 × 4, 6 × 2.5, and 4 × 2 mm, anteroposteriorly. All maxillary frameworks were 0.65 mm in thickness. The frameworks were of a Kennedy Class II Mod I design with 3 widely separated vertical reference points to measure deformation. Two tests were conducted to evaluate the functional strength for each framework. The first test was masticatory simulation, or torsional force. The second test was a drop test from a height of 3 feet. Permanent deformation was then determined after each test. The Cochran-Armitage test (α=.05) was used for both the torsion test and the drop test. Results: A statistically significant difference in permanent deformation was found for the palatal strap design among the 4 different dimensions for the compressive test (P=.015) and the drop test (P=.044). Conclusion: It is safe to reduce the dimensions of some major connectors under normal loads. The reduced size of the connectors places the removable partial denture at increased risk for deformation when dropped from a height.

AB - Statement of problem: The design of a removable dental prosthesis (RDP) must balance functional strength, comfort to the patient, and the health of the tissue. While research has been conducted to enhance the strength of major connectors, little has been done to determine if the dimensions of major connectors can be reduced in order to enhance patient comfort and tissue health. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the minimum major connector dimensions of 1 mandibular and 2 maxillary major connectors that would provide adequate functional strength. Material and methods: Sixty chromium-cobalt alloy (Vitallium) RDP frameworks were fabricated. The major connector designs were: a mandibular lingual bar, a maxillary palatal strap, and a maxillary anterior-posterior (A-P) palatal strap. Four groups of 5 frameworks with diminishing dimensions were fabricated for each major connector design. The lingual bar was tested at 4, 3, 2.5, and 2 mm in height, occlusogingivally, and 1.6 mm in thickness; the palatal strap at 8, 6, 4, and 2 mm, anteroposteriorly; and the A-P palatal strap at 10 × 6, 8 × 4, 6 × 2.5, and 4 × 2 mm, anteroposteriorly. All maxillary frameworks were 0.65 mm in thickness. The frameworks were of a Kennedy Class II Mod I design with 3 widely separated vertical reference points to measure deformation. Two tests were conducted to evaluate the functional strength for each framework. The first test was masticatory simulation, or torsional force. The second test was a drop test from a height of 3 feet. Permanent deformation was then determined after each test. The Cochran-Armitage test (α=.05) was used for both the torsion test and the drop test. Results: A statistically significant difference in permanent deformation was found for the palatal strap design among the 4 different dimensions for the compressive test (P=.015) and the drop test (P=.044). Conclusion: It is safe to reduce the dimensions of some major connectors under normal loads. The reduced size of the connectors places the removable partial denture at increased risk for deformation when dropped from a height.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249787617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249787617&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.04.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 17547949

AN - SCOPUS:34249787617

VL - 97

SP - 299

EP - 304

JO - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

JF - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

SN - 0022-3913

IS - 5

ER -