The validity of using E4D compare's "% comparison" to assess crown preparations in preclinical dental education

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When a dental school is deciding which technology to introduce into a curriculum, it is important to identify the educational goals for the system. The authors' primary goal for the use of a computer-aided resource was to offer students another way to assess their performance, to enhance their learning, and to potentially decrease their learning curve in the preclinical environment prior to using the technique in clinical patient care. The aim of this study was to examine the validity of the "% Comparison" numbers derived from the E4D Compare software program. Three practical examinations were administered to a class of 82 students at one U.S. dental school over a six-week period. The grading of the practical examinations was performed with individual faculty members being responsible for evaluating specific aspects of each preparation. A digital image of each student's practical examination tooth was then obtained and compared to the digital image of an ideal preparation. The preparations were compared, and the "% Comparison" was recorded at five tolerance levels. Spearman's correlation coefficient (SCC) was used to measure the agreement in rankings between the faculty scores on practical exams 1-3 and the scores obtained using E4D Compare at the different tolerance levels. The SCC values for practical exams 2 and 3 were all between 0.2 and 0.4; for practical exam 1, the SCC values ranged from 0.47 to 0.56. There was no correlation between the faculty scores and the numbers given by the "% Comparison" of the software.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1445-1451
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Dental Education
Volume79
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Dental Education
Crowns
Dental Schools
Students
Software
examination
tolerance
education
Learning Curve
Curriculum
student
Patient Care
Tooth
grading
Learning
patient care
school
learning
Technology
Values

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • CAD/CAM
  • Dental education
  • Grading
  • Preclinical simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Education

Cite this

@article{05073a37feb5460ea69e4f2b08c37400,
title = "The validity of using E4D compare's {"}{\%} comparison{"} to assess crown preparations in preclinical dental education",
abstract = "When a dental school is deciding which technology to introduce into a curriculum, it is important to identify the educational goals for the system. The authors' primary goal for the use of a computer-aided resource was to offer students another way to assess their performance, to enhance their learning, and to potentially decrease their learning curve in the preclinical environment prior to using the technique in clinical patient care. The aim of this study was to examine the validity of the {"}{\%} Comparison{"} numbers derived from the E4D Compare software program. Three practical examinations were administered to a class of 82 students at one U.S. dental school over a six-week period. The grading of the practical examinations was performed with individual faculty members being responsible for evaluating specific aspects of each preparation. A digital image of each student's practical examination tooth was then obtained and compared to the digital image of an ideal preparation. The preparations were compared, and the {"}{\%} Comparison{"} was recorded at five tolerance levels. Spearman's correlation coefficient (SCC) was used to measure the agreement in rankings between the faculty scores on practical exams 1-3 and the scores obtained using E4D Compare at the different tolerance levels. The SCC values for practical exams 2 and 3 were all between 0.2 and 0.4; for practical exam 1, the SCC values ranged from 0.47 to 0.56. There was no correlation between the faculty scores and the numbers given by the {"}{\%} Comparison{"} of the software.",
keywords = "Assessment, CAD/CAM, Dental education, Grading, Preclinical simulation",
author = "Callan, {Richard S} and Haywood, {Van Benjamine} and Cooper, {Jeril Ransom} and Furness, {Alan R} and Looney, {Stephen Warwick}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "1445--1451",
journal = "Journal of Dental Education",
issn = "0022-0337",
publisher = "American Dental Education Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The validity of using E4D compare's "% comparison" to assess crown preparations in preclinical dental education

AU - Callan, Richard S

AU - Haywood, Van Benjamine

AU - Cooper, Jeril Ransom

AU - Furness, Alan R

AU - Looney, Stephen Warwick

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - When a dental school is deciding which technology to introduce into a curriculum, it is important to identify the educational goals for the system. The authors' primary goal for the use of a computer-aided resource was to offer students another way to assess their performance, to enhance their learning, and to potentially decrease their learning curve in the preclinical environment prior to using the technique in clinical patient care. The aim of this study was to examine the validity of the "% Comparison" numbers derived from the E4D Compare software program. Three practical examinations were administered to a class of 82 students at one U.S. dental school over a six-week period. The grading of the practical examinations was performed with individual faculty members being responsible for evaluating specific aspects of each preparation. A digital image of each student's practical examination tooth was then obtained and compared to the digital image of an ideal preparation. The preparations were compared, and the "% Comparison" was recorded at five tolerance levels. Spearman's correlation coefficient (SCC) was used to measure the agreement in rankings between the faculty scores on practical exams 1-3 and the scores obtained using E4D Compare at the different tolerance levels. The SCC values for practical exams 2 and 3 were all between 0.2 and 0.4; for practical exam 1, the SCC values ranged from 0.47 to 0.56. There was no correlation between the faculty scores and the numbers given by the "% Comparison" of the software.

AB - When a dental school is deciding which technology to introduce into a curriculum, it is important to identify the educational goals for the system. The authors' primary goal for the use of a computer-aided resource was to offer students another way to assess their performance, to enhance their learning, and to potentially decrease their learning curve in the preclinical environment prior to using the technique in clinical patient care. The aim of this study was to examine the validity of the "% Comparison" numbers derived from the E4D Compare software program. Three practical examinations were administered to a class of 82 students at one U.S. dental school over a six-week period. The grading of the practical examinations was performed with individual faculty members being responsible for evaluating specific aspects of each preparation. A digital image of each student's practical examination tooth was then obtained and compared to the digital image of an ideal preparation. The preparations were compared, and the "% Comparison" was recorded at five tolerance levels. Spearman's correlation coefficient (SCC) was used to measure the agreement in rankings between the faculty scores on practical exams 1-3 and the scores obtained using E4D Compare at the different tolerance levels. The SCC values for practical exams 2 and 3 were all between 0.2 and 0.4; for practical exam 1, the SCC values ranged from 0.47 to 0.56. There was no correlation between the faculty scores and the numbers given by the "% Comparison" of the software.

KW - Assessment

KW - CAD/CAM

KW - Dental education

KW - Grading

KW - Preclinical simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949254933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949254933&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 1445

EP - 1451

JO - Journal of Dental Education

JF - Journal of Dental Education

SN - 0022-0337

IS - 12

ER -