Time and cost analysis of gallbladder surgery under the acute care surgery model

Maria Michailidou, Narong Kulvatunyou, Randall S. Friese, Lynn Gries, Donald J. Green, Bellal Joseph, Terence OKeeffe, Andrew L. Tang, Gary Vercruysse, Peter Rhee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The acute care surgery (ACS) model has been shown to improve work flow efficiency and to reduce hospital stay. We hypothesized that, in patients with gallbladder (GB) disease who were admitted through our emergency department (ED) and then underwent surgery, the ACS model shortened the time to surgery, decreased the length of hospital stay, and reduced hospital costs. METHODS: We retrospectively queried our GB surgery practice records for 2008 (before the establishment of the ACS model at our institution in 2009). We then performed time and cost comparison with our prospectively maintained GB surgery practice database for 2010. We excluded any inpatient GB surgeries and any GB surgeries that were performed for choledocholithiasis and acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: Our study was composed of 94 patients from the pre-ACS period (2008) and 234 patients from the ACS period (2010). Patients' baseline characteristics were similar between the two periods, except for a higher percentage of females in the ACS period (77% vs. 66%, p = 0.04). Approximately one third of patients from both periods had acute cholecystitis. In the ACS period, the mean time to surgery, that is, from ED arrival to operating room arrival, was shorter (20.8 [13.8] hours vs. 25.7 [16.2] hours, p = 0.007); more patients underwent surgery within 24 hours after ED arrival (75% vs. 59%, p = 0.004); and more patients underwent surgery between 12:00 midnight and 7:00 AM (25% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.001). As a result, hospital length of stay was 1.4 days shorter in the ACS period, with cost saving per patient of approximately $1,000. CONCLUSION: We found that implementation of ACS model led to benefits for patients who came to our ED with GB disease, including shorter time to surgery, shorter hospital stay, and decreased hospital costs. The ACS model benefits the health care system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)710-714
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
Volume76
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Gallbladder
Costs and Cost Analysis
Length of Stay
Hospital Emergency Service
Gallbladder Diseases
Hospital Costs
Choledocholithiasis
Acute Cholecystitis
Workflow
Operating Rooms

Keywords

  • Acute care surgery
  • Cost
  • Gallbladder
  • Time

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Michailidou, M., Kulvatunyou, N., Friese, R. S., Gries, L., Green, D. J., Joseph, B., ... Rhee, P. (2014). Time and cost analysis of gallbladder surgery under the acute care surgery model. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 76(3), 710-714. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000117

Time and cost analysis of gallbladder surgery under the acute care surgery model. / Michailidou, Maria; Kulvatunyou, Narong; Friese, Randall S.; Gries, Lynn; Green, Donald J.; Joseph, Bellal; OKeeffe, Terence; Tang, Andrew L.; Vercruysse, Gary; Rhee, Peter.

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vol. 76, No. 3, 01.03.2014, p. 710-714.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Michailidou, M, Kulvatunyou, N, Friese, RS, Gries, L, Green, DJ, Joseph, B, OKeeffe, T, Tang, AL, Vercruysse, G & Rhee, P 2014, 'Time and cost analysis of gallbladder surgery under the acute care surgery model', Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 710-714. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000117
Michailidou, Maria ; Kulvatunyou, Narong ; Friese, Randall S. ; Gries, Lynn ; Green, Donald J. ; Joseph, Bellal ; OKeeffe, Terence ; Tang, Andrew L. ; Vercruysse, Gary ; Rhee, Peter. / Time and cost analysis of gallbladder surgery under the acute care surgery model. In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 76, No. 3. pp. 710-714.
@article{2bad502679e640f08f99f6d19732a1a1,
title = "Time and cost analysis of gallbladder surgery under the acute care surgery model",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The acute care surgery (ACS) model has been shown to improve work flow efficiency and to reduce hospital stay. We hypothesized that, in patients with gallbladder (GB) disease who were admitted through our emergency department (ED) and then underwent surgery, the ACS model shortened the time to surgery, decreased the length of hospital stay, and reduced hospital costs. METHODS: We retrospectively queried our GB surgery practice records for 2008 (before the establishment of the ACS model at our institution in 2009). We then performed time and cost comparison with our prospectively maintained GB surgery practice database for 2010. We excluded any inpatient GB surgeries and any GB surgeries that were performed for choledocholithiasis and acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: Our study was composed of 94 patients from the pre-ACS period (2008) and 234 patients from the ACS period (2010). Patients' baseline characteristics were similar between the two periods, except for a higher percentage of females in the ACS period (77{\%} vs. 66{\%}, p = 0.04). Approximately one third of patients from both periods had acute cholecystitis. In the ACS period, the mean time to surgery, that is, from ED arrival to operating room arrival, was shorter (20.8 [13.8] hours vs. 25.7 [16.2] hours, p = 0.007); more patients underwent surgery within 24 hours after ED arrival (75{\%} vs. 59{\%}, p = 0.004); and more patients underwent surgery between 12:00 midnight and 7:00 AM (25{\%} vs. 6.4{\%}, p < 0.001). As a result, hospital length of stay was 1.4 days shorter in the ACS period, with cost saving per patient of approximately $1,000. CONCLUSION: We found that implementation of ACS model led to benefits for patients who came to our ED with GB disease, including shorter time to surgery, shorter hospital stay, and decreased hospital costs. The ACS model benefits the health care system.",
keywords = "Acute care surgery, Cost, Gallbladder, Time",
author = "Maria Michailidou and Narong Kulvatunyou and Friese, {Randall S.} and Lynn Gries and Green, {Donald J.} and Bellal Joseph and Terence OKeeffe and Tang, {Andrew L.} and Gary Vercruysse and Peter Rhee",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0000000000000117",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "710--714",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time and cost analysis of gallbladder surgery under the acute care surgery model

AU - Michailidou, Maria

AU - Kulvatunyou, Narong

AU - Friese, Randall S.

AU - Gries, Lynn

AU - Green, Donald J.

AU - Joseph, Bellal

AU - OKeeffe, Terence

AU - Tang, Andrew L.

AU - Vercruysse, Gary

AU - Rhee, Peter

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The acute care surgery (ACS) model has been shown to improve work flow efficiency and to reduce hospital stay. We hypothesized that, in patients with gallbladder (GB) disease who were admitted through our emergency department (ED) and then underwent surgery, the ACS model shortened the time to surgery, decreased the length of hospital stay, and reduced hospital costs. METHODS: We retrospectively queried our GB surgery practice records for 2008 (before the establishment of the ACS model at our institution in 2009). We then performed time and cost comparison with our prospectively maintained GB surgery practice database for 2010. We excluded any inpatient GB surgeries and any GB surgeries that were performed for choledocholithiasis and acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: Our study was composed of 94 patients from the pre-ACS period (2008) and 234 patients from the ACS period (2010). Patients' baseline characteristics were similar between the two periods, except for a higher percentage of females in the ACS period (77% vs. 66%, p = 0.04). Approximately one third of patients from both periods had acute cholecystitis. In the ACS period, the mean time to surgery, that is, from ED arrival to operating room arrival, was shorter (20.8 [13.8] hours vs. 25.7 [16.2] hours, p = 0.007); more patients underwent surgery within 24 hours after ED arrival (75% vs. 59%, p = 0.004); and more patients underwent surgery between 12:00 midnight and 7:00 AM (25% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.001). As a result, hospital length of stay was 1.4 days shorter in the ACS period, with cost saving per patient of approximately $1,000. CONCLUSION: We found that implementation of ACS model led to benefits for patients who came to our ED with GB disease, including shorter time to surgery, shorter hospital stay, and decreased hospital costs. The ACS model benefits the health care system.

AB - BACKGROUND: The acute care surgery (ACS) model has been shown to improve work flow efficiency and to reduce hospital stay. We hypothesized that, in patients with gallbladder (GB) disease who were admitted through our emergency department (ED) and then underwent surgery, the ACS model shortened the time to surgery, decreased the length of hospital stay, and reduced hospital costs. METHODS: We retrospectively queried our GB surgery practice records for 2008 (before the establishment of the ACS model at our institution in 2009). We then performed time and cost comparison with our prospectively maintained GB surgery practice database for 2010. We excluded any inpatient GB surgeries and any GB surgeries that were performed for choledocholithiasis and acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: Our study was composed of 94 patients from the pre-ACS period (2008) and 234 patients from the ACS period (2010). Patients' baseline characteristics were similar between the two periods, except for a higher percentage of females in the ACS period (77% vs. 66%, p = 0.04). Approximately one third of patients from both periods had acute cholecystitis. In the ACS period, the mean time to surgery, that is, from ED arrival to operating room arrival, was shorter (20.8 [13.8] hours vs. 25.7 [16.2] hours, p = 0.007); more patients underwent surgery within 24 hours after ED arrival (75% vs. 59%, p = 0.004); and more patients underwent surgery between 12:00 midnight and 7:00 AM (25% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.001). As a result, hospital length of stay was 1.4 days shorter in the ACS period, with cost saving per patient of approximately $1,000. CONCLUSION: We found that implementation of ACS model led to benefits for patients who came to our ED with GB disease, including shorter time to surgery, shorter hospital stay, and decreased hospital costs. The ACS model benefits the health care system.

KW - Acute care surgery

KW - Cost

KW - Gallbladder

KW - Time

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896727979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896727979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000000117

DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000000117

M3 - Article

VL - 76

SP - 710

EP - 714

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 3

ER -