Time Cost of Standardized Nursing Screens in the Emergency Department

Victoria L. Migdal, Kaitlin Harper, Nazish Haqqani, Bruce Janiak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Various policies require that screening questions be asked of all patients who present to the emergency department (ED). No studies have previously examined the potential time costs of standardized screens. Our objective was to analyze the time nursing spent conducting standardized nursing screens and calculate the corresponding time cost. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of ED registered nurses (RN) performing triage assessments on adults presenting to the ED. A study author timed nurses while the RN asked five pre-selected questions from their current triage protocol. The time cost of each question was determined by multiplying the length of time spent asking the question each year by the mean hourly wage of RNs at the study hospital. (T/3,600) × V × S; T = mean time per question (in seconds); V = annual patient volume; S = mean hourly RN wage. RESULTS: We observed 200 triage assessments. During the triage assessments, 130 patients (65%) were asked about pneumococcal vaccine status; 161 (80.5%) about tetanus vaccine status; 184 (92%) about medication allergies; 172 (86%) about influenza vaccine; and 73 (36.5%) about recent travel. The mean time spent per question ranged from 4.37-6.26 seconds. The estimated annual time used to ask the five questions in the study ED is 590.73 hours, which equates to $20,675.50 in nursing costs per year. CONCLUSION: There are potential monetary and time costs of standardized screening questions in the ED. The values heavily impact time and cost efficiency in the ED and could be redirected to more pertinent patient care. The required screening questions often have an unclear utility on the care that the patient receives in the ED. Further studies are needed to determine cost effectiveness of required ED screenings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)851-854
Number of pages4
JournalThe western journal of emergency medicine
Volume20
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 16 2019

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Nursing
Costs and Cost Analysis
Triage
Nurses
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Patient Care
Pneumococcal Vaccines
Tetanus Toxoid
Influenza Vaccines
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Observational Studies
Hypersensitivity
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Time Cost of Standardized Nursing Screens in the Emergency Department. / Migdal, Victoria L.; Harper, Kaitlin; Haqqani, Nazish; Janiak, Bruce.

In: The western journal of emergency medicine, Vol. 20, No. 6, 16.10.2019, p. 851-854.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Migdal, Victoria L. ; Harper, Kaitlin ; Haqqani, Nazish ; Janiak, Bruce. / Time Cost of Standardized Nursing Screens in the Emergency Department. In: The western journal of emergency medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 20, No. 6. pp. 851-854.
@article{10f030059fb347ba91b704dbeac80ca1,
title = "Time Cost of Standardized Nursing Screens in the Emergency Department",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Various policies require that screening questions be asked of all patients who present to the emergency department (ED). No studies have previously examined the potential time costs of standardized screens. Our objective was to analyze the time nursing spent conducting standardized nursing screens and calculate the corresponding time cost. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of ED registered nurses (RN) performing triage assessments on adults presenting to the ED. A study author timed nurses while the RN asked five pre-selected questions from their current triage protocol. The time cost of each question was determined by multiplying the length of time spent asking the question each year by the mean hourly wage of RNs at the study hospital. (T/3,600) × V × S; T = mean time per question (in seconds); V = annual patient volume; S = mean hourly RN wage. RESULTS: We observed 200 triage assessments. During the triage assessments, 130 patients (65{\%}) were asked about pneumococcal vaccine status; 161 (80.5{\%}) about tetanus vaccine status; 184 (92{\%}) about medication allergies; 172 (86{\%}) about influenza vaccine; and 73 (36.5{\%}) about recent travel. The mean time spent per question ranged from 4.37-6.26 seconds. The estimated annual time used to ask the five questions in the study ED is 590.73 hours, which equates to $20,675.50 in nursing costs per year. CONCLUSION: There are potential monetary and time costs of standardized screening questions in the ED. The values heavily impact time and cost efficiency in the ED and could be redirected to more pertinent patient care. The required screening questions often have an unclear utility on the care that the patient receives in the ED. Further studies are needed to determine cost effectiveness of required ED screenings.",
author = "Migdal, {Victoria L.} and Kaitlin Harper and Nazish Haqqani and Bruce Janiak",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "16",
doi = "10.5811/westjem.2019.9.44084",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "851--854",
journal = "Western Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1936-900X",
publisher = "University of California",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time Cost of Standardized Nursing Screens in the Emergency Department

AU - Migdal, Victoria L.

AU - Harper, Kaitlin

AU - Haqqani, Nazish

AU - Janiak, Bruce

PY - 2019/10/16

Y1 - 2019/10/16

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Various policies require that screening questions be asked of all patients who present to the emergency department (ED). No studies have previously examined the potential time costs of standardized screens. Our objective was to analyze the time nursing spent conducting standardized nursing screens and calculate the corresponding time cost. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of ED registered nurses (RN) performing triage assessments on adults presenting to the ED. A study author timed nurses while the RN asked five pre-selected questions from their current triage protocol. The time cost of each question was determined by multiplying the length of time spent asking the question each year by the mean hourly wage of RNs at the study hospital. (T/3,600) × V × S; T = mean time per question (in seconds); V = annual patient volume; S = mean hourly RN wage. RESULTS: We observed 200 triage assessments. During the triage assessments, 130 patients (65%) were asked about pneumococcal vaccine status; 161 (80.5%) about tetanus vaccine status; 184 (92%) about medication allergies; 172 (86%) about influenza vaccine; and 73 (36.5%) about recent travel. The mean time spent per question ranged from 4.37-6.26 seconds. The estimated annual time used to ask the five questions in the study ED is 590.73 hours, which equates to $20,675.50 in nursing costs per year. CONCLUSION: There are potential monetary and time costs of standardized screening questions in the ED. The values heavily impact time and cost efficiency in the ED and could be redirected to more pertinent patient care. The required screening questions often have an unclear utility on the care that the patient receives in the ED. Further studies are needed to determine cost effectiveness of required ED screenings.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Various policies require that screening questions be asked of all patients who present to the emergency department (ED). No studies have previously examined the potential time costs of standardized screens. Our objective was to analyze the time nursing spent conducting standardized nursing screens and calculate the corresponding time cost. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of ED registered nurses (RN) performing triage assessments on adults presenting to the ED. A study author timed nurses while the RN asked five pre-selected questions from their current triage protocol. The time cost of each question was determined by multiplying the length of time spent asking the question each year by the mean hourly wage of RNs at the study hospital. (T/3,600) × V × S; T = mean time per question (in seconds); V = annual patient volume; S = mean hourly RN wage. RESULTS: We observed 200 triage assessments. During the triage assessments, 130 patients (65%) were asked about pneumococcal vaccine status; 161 (80.5%) about tetanus vaccine status; 184 (92%) about medication allergies; 172 (86%) about influenza vaccine; and 73 (36.5%) about recent travel. The mean time spent per question ranged from 4.37-6.26 seconds. The estimated annual time used to ask the five questions in the study ED is 590.73 hours, which equates to $20,675.50 in nursing costs per year. CONCLUSION: There are potential monetary and time costs of standardized screening questions in the ED. The values heavily impact time and cost efficiency in the ED and could be redirected to more pertinent patient care. The required screening questions often have an unclear utility on the care that the patient receives in the ED. Further studies are needed to determine cost effectiveness of required ED screenings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075321457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075321457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5811/westjem.2019.9.44084

DO - 10.5811/westjem.2019.9.44084

M3 - Article

C2 - 31738710

AN - SCOPUS:85075321457

VL - 20

SP - 851

EP - 854

JO - Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 1936-900X

IS - 6

ER -