Time to Let Go of the Illusion That Psychotherapy Extends the Survival of Cancer Patients: Reply to Kraemer, Kuchler, and Spiegel (2009)

James C. Coyne, Brett D. Thombs, Michael Stefanek, Steven C. Palmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors recently reviewed evidence related to the notion that psychotherapy extends survival in cancer patients (J. C. Coyne, M. Stefanek, & S. C. Palmer, 2007). The authors found that no study to date, including several designed and powered to test this hypothesis, can be reasonably interpreted as evidence that cancer patients live longer as a result of receiving psychotherapy. The authors concluded that the evidence against psychotherapy as a life-prolonging intervention in cancer is sufficiently robust to discontinue funding studies in this area. H. C. Kraemer, T. Kuchler, and D. Spiegel (2009) critiqued the authors' review. The authors respond directly to numerous misrepresentations made by Kraemer et al. More importantly, the authors provide readers with an accurate overview of the main issues being debated and the reasons for their conclusions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)179-182
Number of pages4
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume135
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2009

Fingerprint

Psychotherapy
Survival
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • cancer
  • mortality
  • psychotherapy
  • survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Time to Let Go of the Illusion That Psychotherapy Extends the Survival of Cancer Patients : Reply to Kraemer, Kuchler, and Spiegel (2009). / Coyne, James C.; Thombs, Brett D.; Stefanek, Michael; Palmer, Steven C.

In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 135, No. 2, 01.03.2009, p. 179-182.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coyne, James C. ; Thombs, Brett D. ; Stefanek, Michael ; Palmer, Steven C. / Time to Let Go of the Illusion That Psychotherapy Extends the Survival of Cancer Patients : Reply to Kraemer, Kuchler, and Spiegel (2009). In: Psychological Bulletin. 2009 ; Vol. 135, No. 2. pp. 179-182.
@article{6fff1e15281a485aba0999939a028452,
title = "Time to Let Go of the Illusion That Psychotherapy Extends the Survival of Cancer Patients: Reply to Kraemer, Kuchler, and Spiegel (2009)",
abstract = "The authors recently reviewed evidence related to the notion that psychotherapy extends survival in cancer patients (J. C. Coyne, M. Stefanek, & S. C. Palmer, 2007). The authors found that no study to date, including several designed and powered to test this hypothesis, can be reasonably interpreted as evidence that cancer patients live longer as a result of receiving psychotherapy. The authors concluded that the evidence against psychotherapy as a life-prolonging intervention in cancer is sufficiently robust to discontinue funding studies in this area. H. C. Kraemer, T. Kuchler, and D. Spiegel (2009) critiqued the authors' review. The authors respond directly to numerous misrepresentations made by Kraemer et al. More importantly, the authors provide readers with an accurate overview of the main issues being debated and the reasons for their conclusions.",
keywords = "cancer, mortality, psychotherapy, survival",
author = "Coyne, {James C.} and Thombs, {Brett D.} and Michael Stefanek and Palmer, {Steven C.}",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0014720",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "135",
pages = "179--182",
journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
issn = "0033-2909",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time to Let Go of the Illusion That Psychotherapy Extends the Survival of Cancer Patients

T2 - Reply to Kraemer, Kuchler, and Spiegel (2009)

AU - Coyne, James C.

AU - Thombs, Brett D.

AU - Stefanek, Michael

AU - Palmer, Steven C.

PY - 2009/3/1

Y1 - 2009/3/1

N2 - The authors recently reviewed evidence related to the notion that psychotherapy extends survival in cancer patients (J. C. Coyne, M. Stefanek, & S. C. Palmer, 2007). The authors found that no study to date, including several designed and powered to test this hypothesis, can be reasonably interpreted as evidence that cancer patients live longer as a result of receiving psychotherapy. The authors concluded that the evidence against psychotherapy as a life-prolonging intervention in cancer is sufficiently robust to discontinue funding studies in this area. H. C. Kraemer, T. Kuchler, and D. Spiegel (2009) critiqued the authors' review. The authors respond directly to numerous misrepresentations made by Kraemer et al. More importantly, the authors provide readers with an accurate overview of the main issues being debated and the reasons for their conclusions.

AB - The authors recently reviewed evidence related to the notion that psychotherapy extends survival in cancer patients (J. C. Coyne, M. Stefanek, & S. C. Palmer, 2007). The authors found that no study to date, including several designed and powered to test this hypothesis, can be reasonably interpreted as evidence that cancer patients live longer as a result of receiving psychotherapy. The authors concluded that the evidence against psychotherapy as a life-prolonging intervention in cancer is sufficiently robust to discontinue funding studies in this area. H. C. Kraemer, T. Kuchler, and D. Spiegel (2009) critiqued the authors' review. The authors respond directly to numerous misrepresentations made by Kraemer et al. More importantly, the authors provide readers with an accurate overview of the main issues being debated and the reasons for their conclusions.

KW - cancer

KW - mortality

KW - psychotherapy

KW - survival

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=61849145247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=61849145247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0014720

DO - 10.1037/a0014720

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:61849145247

VL - 135

SP - 179

EP - 182

JO - Psychological Bulletin

JF - Psychological Bulletin

SN - 0033-2909

IS - 2

ER -