Topical nasal anesthesia and laryngopharyngeal sensory testing: A prospective, double-blind crossover study

Paul E. Johnson, Peter C. Belafsky, Gregory N Postma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination testing (LPSDT) has become a popular means of detecting sensory deficits in patients with voice and/or swallowing complaints. During this procedure, transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy (TFL) using a specialized fiberoptic scope is performed in order to deliver discrete pulses of air to the laryngopharyngeal mucosa. Historically, topical anesthesia has been applied to the nasal mucosa to lessen discomfort during TFL. Because of the concern that topical nasal anesthesia could also anesthetize the laryngopharynx, it is usually not used during sensory testing. To prospectively compare LPSDT scores after the nasal administration of cocaine hydrochloride, oxymetazoline hydrochloride, and saline solution, we prospectively evaluated 15 subjects undergoing LPSDT. Each had the procedure performed on 3 separate occasions. Before examination, each patient was administered either 4% cocaine, 0.05% oxymetazoline, or saline solution by atomizer (2 sprays of 1-second duration to each naris). By the conclusion of the study, each patient had undergone sensory testing with each of the test agents. During each examination, the minimal air pulse eliciting the laryngeal adductor reflex was recorded for both sides of the laryngopharynx. Both patient and examiner were blinded to the test agent used. The mean sensory score for saline solution was 3.9 mm Hg. The sensory scores for oxymetazoline and cocaine were 3.4 and 3.5 mm Hg, respectively. When compared to saline solution and oxymetazoline independently, sensory testing of the laryngopharynx during which the nose was anesthetized with cocaine resulted in similar thresholds for eliciting the laryngeal adductor reflex (p =. 40 and p =. 85). We conclude that topical anesthesia can be applied to the nasal cavity during LPSDT without altering laryngeal sensation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-16
Number of pages3
JournalAnnals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology
Volume112
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Oxymetazoline
Cocaine
Nose
Double-Blind Method
Sodium Chloride
Hypopharynx
Cross-Over Studies
Anesthesia
Laryngoscopy
Reflex
Air
Intranasal Administration
Nasal Mucosa
Nasal Cavity
Nebulizers and Vaporizers
Deglutition
Mucous Membrane

Keywords

  • Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination testing
  • Topical nasal anesthesia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Topical nasal anesthesia and laryngopharyngeal sensory testing : A prospective, double-blind crossover study. / Johnson, Paul E.; Belafsky, Peter C.; Postma, Gregory N.

In: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Vol. 112, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 14-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ff09dfa7fc0b4e10a073fb4d4f4bf6c6,
title = "Topical nasal anesthesia and laryngopharyngeal sensory testing: A prospective, double-blind crossover study",
abstract = "Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination testing (LPSDT) has become a popular means of detecting sensory deficits in patients with voice and/or swallowing complaints. During this procedure, transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy (TFL) using a specialized fiberoptic scope is performed in order to deliver discrete pulses of air to the laryngopharyngeal mucosa. Historically, topical anesthesia has been applied to the nasal mucosa to lessen discomfort during TFL. Because of the concern that topical nasal anesthesia could also anesthetize the laryngopharynx, it is usually not used during sensory testing. To prospectively compare LPSDT scores after the nasal administration of cocaine hydrochloride, oxymetazoline hydrochloride, and saline solution, we prospectively evaluated 15 subjects undergoing LPSDT. Each had the procedure performed on 3 separate occasions. Before examination, each patient was administered either 4{\%} cocaine, 0.05{\%} oxymetazoline, or saline solution by atomizer (2 sprays of 1-second duration to each naris). By the conclusion of the study, each patient had undergone sensory testing with each of the test agents. During each examination, the minimal air pulse eliciting the laryngeal adductor reflex was recorded for both sides of the laryngopharynx. Both patient and examiner were blinded to the test agent used. The mean sensory score for saline solution was 3.9 mm Hg. The sensory scores for oxymetazoline and cocaine were 3.4 and 3.5 mm Hg, respectively. When compared to saline solution and oxymetazoline independently, sensory testing of the laryngopharynx during which the nose was anesthetized with cocaine resulted in similar thresholds for eliciting the laryngeal adductor reflex (p =. 40 and p =. 85). We conclude that topical anesthesia can be applied to the nasal cavity during LPSDT without altering laryngeal sensation.",
keywords = "Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination testing, Topical nasal anesthesia",
author = "Johnson, {Paul E.} and Belafsky, {Peter C.} and Postma, {Gregory N}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/000348940311200104",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "112",
pages = "14--16",
journal = "Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology",
issn = "0003-4894",
publisher = "Annals Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Topical nasal anesthesia and laryngopharyngeal sensory testing

T2 - A prospective, double-blind crossover study

AU - Johnson, Paul E.

AU - Belafsky, Peter C.

AU - Postma, Gregory N

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination testing (LPSDT) has become a popular means of detecting sensory deficits in patients with voice and/or swallowing complaints. During this procedure, transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy (TFL) using a specialized fiberoptic scope is performed in order to deliver discrete pulses of air to the laryngopharyngeal mucosa. Historically, topical anesthesia has been applied to the nasal mucosa to lessen discomfort during TFL. Because of the concern that topical nasal anesthesia could also anesthetize the laryngopharynx, it is usually not used during sensory testing. To prospectively compare LPSDT scores after the nasal administration of cocaine hydrochloride, oxymetazoline hydrochloride, and saline solution, we prospectively evaluated 15 subjects undergoing LPSDT. Each had the procedure performed on 3 separate occasions. Before examination, each patient was administered either 4% cocaine, 0.05% oxymetazoline, or saline solution by atomizer (2 sprays of 1-second duration to each naris). By the conclusion of the study, each patient had undergone sensory testing with each of the test agents. During each examination, the minimal air pulse eliciting the laryngeal adductor reflex was recorded for both sides of the laryngopharynx. Both patient and examiner were blinded to the test agent used. The mean sensory score for saline solution was 3.9 mm Hg. The sensory scores for oxymetazoline and cocaine were 3.4 and 3.5 mm Hg, respectively. When compared to saline solution and oxymetazoline independently, sensory testing of the laryngopharynx during which the nose was anesthetized with cocaine resulted in similar thresholds for eliciting the laryngeal adductor reflex (p =. 40 and p =. 85). We conclude that topical anesthesia can be applied to the nasal cavity during LPSDT without altering laryngeal sensation.

AB - Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination testing (LPSDT) has become a popular means of detecting sensory deficits in patients with voice and/or swallowing complaints. During this procedure, transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy (TFL) using a specialized fiberoptic scope is performed in order to deliver discrete pulses of air to the laryngopharyngeal mucosa. Historically, topical anesthesia has been applied to the nasal mucosa to lessen discomfort during TFL. Because of the concern that topical nasal anesthesia could also anesthetize the laryngopharynx, it is usually not used during sensory testing. To prospectively compare LPSDT scores after the nasal administration of cocaine hydrochloride, oxymetazoline hydrochloride, and saline solution, we prospectively evaluated 15 subjects undergoing LPSDT. Each had the procedure performed on 3 separate occasions. Before examination, each patient was administered either 4% cocaine, 0.05% oxymetazoline, or saline solution by atomizer (2 sprays of 1-second duration to each naris). By the conclusion of the study, each patient had undergone sensory testing with each of the test agents. During each examination, the minimal air pulse eliciting the laryngeal adductor reflex was recorded for both sides of the laryngopharynx. Both patient and examiner were blinded to the test agent used. The mean sensory score for saline solution was 3.9 mm Hg. The sensory scores for oxymetazoline and cocaine were 3.4 and 3.5 mm Hg, respectively. When compared to saline solution and oxymetazoline independently, sensory testing of the laryngopharynx during which the nose was anesthetized with cocaine resulted in similar thresholds for eliciting the laryngeal adductor reflex (p =. 40 and p =. 85). We conclude that topical anesthesia can be applied to the nasal cavity during LPSDT without altering laryngeal sensation.

KW - Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination testing

KW - Topical nasal anesthesia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037229351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037229351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/000348940311200104

DO - 10.1177/000348940311200104

M3 - Article

C2 - 12537052

AN - SCOPUS:0037229351

VL - 112

SP - 14

EP - 16

JO - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

JF - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

SN - 0003-4894

IS - 1

ER -