Transcervical tuboplasty

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

1.Tubal cannulation is performed in patients with proximal tubal obstruction using a fluoroscopic approach more commonly than a hysteroscopic approach, although newer techniques have also been described. 2.Antibiotic prophylaxis and some type of premedication are generally recommended for tubal cannulation. 3.About 80 to 90% of patients will have at least one tube successfully canalized in the proximal region using any of the variety of techniques described above, but 10 to 15% will also have distal tubal obstruction. 4.Pregnancy rates vary in the literature, and are difficult to interpret because of the lack of inclusion of the infertility workup, but most pregnancies are intrauterine and occur in the first 3 to 6 months after the procedure. 5. Patient individualization may dictate the appropriate approach (hysteroscopically or fluoroscopically); fluoroscopic canalization obviates the need for general anesthesia, but hysteroscopy/laparoscopy may be needed if distal tubal disease is present. 6.Controlled prospective trials (randomized if possible) need to be conducted to determine the efficacy of the procedure and which of the various methods is best.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)196-202
Number of pages7
JournalAssisted Reproduction Reviews
Volume3
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fallopian Tube Diseases
Catheterization
Hysteroscopy
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Premedication
Pregnancy Rate
Laparoscopy
General Anesthesia
Infertility
Randomized Controlled Trials
Pregnancy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Transcervical tuboplasty. / Layman, Lawrence C; Kawada, C.

In: Assisted Reproduction Reviews, Vol. 3, No. 4, 01.12.1993, p. 196-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Layman, LC & Kawada, C 1993, 'Transcervical tuboplasty', Assisted Reproduction Reviews, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 196-202.
Layman, Lawrence C ; Kawada, C. / Transcervical tuboplasty. In: Assisted Reproduction Reviews. 1993 ; Vol. 3, No. 4. pp. 196-202.
@article{ee6588b5c50d4ea7af3c82c96b69fc6c,
title = "Transcervical tuboplasty",
abstract = "1.Tubal cannulation is performed in patients with proximal tubal obstruction using a fluoroscopic approach more commonly than a hysteroscopic approach, although newer techniques have also been described. 2.Antibiotic prophylaxis and some type of premedication are generally recommended for tubal cannulation. 3.About 80 to 90{\%} of patients will have at least one tube successfully canalized in the proximal region using any of the variety of techniques described above, but 10 to 15{\%} will also have distal tubal obstruction. 4.Pregnancy rates vary in the literature, and are difficult to interpret because of the lack of inclusion of the infertility workup, but most pregnancies are intrauterine and occur in the first 3 to 6 months after the procedure. 5. Patient individualization may dictate the appropriate approach (hysteroscopically or fluoroscopically); fluoroscopic canalization obviates the need for general anesthesia, but hysteroscopy/laparoscopy may be needed if distal tubal disease is present. 6.Controlled prospective trials (randomized if possible) need to be conducted to determine the efficacy of the procedure and which of the various methods is best.",
author = "Layman, {Lawrence C} and C. Kawada",
year = "1993",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "196--202",
journal = "Assisted Reproduction Reviews",
issn = "1051-2446",
publisher = "Decker",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transcervical tuboplasty

AU - Layman, Lawrence C

AU - Kawada, C.

PY - 1993/12/1

Y1 - 1993/12/1

N2 - 1.Tubal cannulation is performed in patients with proximal tubal obstruction using a fluoroscopic approach more commonly than a hysteroscopic approach, although newer techniques have also been described. 2.Antibiotic prophylaxis and some type of premedication are generally recommended for tubal cannulation. 3.About 80 to 90% of patients will have at least one tube successfully canalized in the proximal region using any of the variety of techniques described above, but 10 to 15% will also have distal tubal obstruction. 4.Pregnancy rates vary in the literature, and are difficult to interpret because of the lack of inclusion of the infertility workup, but most pregnancies are intrauterine and occur in the first 3 to 6 months after the procedure. 5. Patient individualization may dictate the appropriate approach (hysteroscopically or fluoroscopically); fluoroscopic canalization obviates the need for general anesthesia, but hysteroscopy/laparoscopy may be needed if distal tubal disease is present. 6.Controlled prospective trials (randomized if possible) need to be conducted to determine the efficacy of the procedure and which of the various methods is best.

AB - 1.Tubal cannulation is performed in patients with proximal tubal obstruction using a fluoroscopic approach more commonly than a hysteroscopic approach, although newer techniques have also been described. 2.Antibiotic prophylaxis and some type of premedication are generally recommended for tubal cannulation. 3.About 80 to 90% of patients will have at least one tube successfully canalized in the proximal region using any of the variety of techniques described above, but 10 to 15% will also have distal tubal obstruction. 4.Pregnancy rates vary in the literature, and are difficult to interpret because of the lack of inclusion of the infertility workup, but most pregnancies are intrauterine and occur in the first 3 to 6 months after the procedure. 5. Patient individualization may dictate the appropriate approach (hysteroscopically or fluoroscopically); fluoroscopic canalization obviates the need for general anesthesia, but hysteroscopy/laparoscopy may be needed if distal tubal disease is present. 6.Controlled prospective trials (randomized if possible) need to be conducted to determine the efficacy of the procedure and which of the various methods is best.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027757197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027757197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 3

SP - 196

EP - 202

JO - Assisted Reproduction Reviews

JF - Assisted Reproduction Reviews

SN - 1051-2446

IS - 4

ER -