Two mechanisms of sensorimotor set adaptation to inclined stance

Kyoung Hyun Lee, Asheeba Baksh, Alyssa Bryant, Mollie McGowan, Ryan McMillan, Kwong Yew Raymond Chong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Orientation of posture relative to the environment depends on the contributions from the somatosensory, vestibular, and visual systems mixed in varying proportions to produce a sensorimotor set. Here, we probed the sensorimotor set composition using a postural adaptation task in which healthy adults stood on an inclined surface for 3 min. Upon returning to a horizontal surface, participants displayed a range of postural orientations – from an aftereffect that consisted of a large forward postural lean to an upright stance with little or no aftereffect. It has been hypothesized that the post-incline postural change depends on each individual’s sensorimotor set: whether the set was dominated by the somatosensory or vestibular system: Somatosensory dominance would cause the lean aftereffect whereas vestibular dominance should steer stance posture toward upright orientation. We investigated the individuals who displayed somatosensory dominance by manipulating their attention to spatial orientation. We introduced a distraction condition in which subjects concurrently performed a difficult arithmetic subtraction task. This manipulation altered the time course of their post-incline aftereffect. When not distracted, participants returned to upright stance within the 3-min period. However, they continued leaning forward when distracted. These results suggest that the mechanism of sensorimotor set adaptation to inclined stance comprises at least two components. The first component reflects the dominant contribution from the somatosensory system. Since the postural lean was observed among these subjects even when they were not distracted, it suggests that the aftereffect is difficult to overcome. The second component includes a covert attentional component which manifests as the dissipation of the aftereffect and the return of posture to upright orientation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number480
JournalFrontiers in Human Neuroscience
Volume11
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 23 2017

Fingerprint

Posture

Keywords

  • Balance control
  • Postural control
  • Sensorimotor set
  • Somatosensory
  • Vestibular
  • Vision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Two mechanisms of sensorimotor set adaptation to inclined stance. / Lee, Kyoung Hyun; Baksh, Asheeba; Bryant, Alyssa; McGowan, Mollie; McMillan, Ryan; Chong, Kwong Yew Raymond.

In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 11, 480, 23.10.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, Kyoung Hyun ; Baksh, Asheeba ; Bryant, Alyssa ; McGowan, Mollie ; McMillan, Ryan ; Chong, Kwong Yew Raymond. / Two mechanisms of sensorimotor set adaptation to inclined stance. In: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2017 ; Vol. 11.
@article{bb93ec6bd1b847d0a69d71000ad3eb5d,
title = "Two mechanisms of sensorimotor set adaptation to inclined stance",
abstract = "Orientation of posture relative to the environment depends on the contributions from the somatosensory, vestibular, and visual systems mixed in varying proportions to produce a sensorimotor set. Here, we probed the sensorimotor set composition using a postural adaptation task in which healthy adults stood on an inclined surface for 3 min. Upon returning to a horizontal surface, participants displayed a range of postural orientations – from an aftereffect that consisted of a large forward postural lean to an upright stance with little or no aftereffect. It has been hypothesized that the post-incline postural change depends on each individual’s sensorimotor set: whether the set was dominated by the somatosensory or vestibular system: Somatosensory dominance would cause the lean aftereffect whereas vestibular dominance should steer stance posture toward upright orientation. We investigated the individuals who displayed somatosensory dominance by manipulating their attention to spatial orientation. We introduced a distraction condition in which subjects concurrently performed a difficult arithmetic subtraction task. This manipulation altered the time course of their post-incline aftereffect. When not distracted, participants returned to upright stance within the 3-min period. However, they continued leaning forward when distracted. These results suggest that the mechanism of sensorimotor set adaptation to inclined stance comprises at least two components. The first component reflects the dominant contribution from the somatosensory system. Since the postural lean was observed among these subjects even when they were not distracted, it suggests that the aftereffect is difficult to overcome. The second component includes a covert attentional component which manifests as the dissipation of the aftereffect and the return of posture to upright orientation.",
keywords = "Balance control, Postural control, Sensorimotor set, Somatosensory, Vestibular, Vision",
author = "Lee, {Kyoung Hyun} and Asheeba Baksh and Alyssa Bryant and Mollie McGowan and Ryan McMillan and Chong, {Kwong Yew Raymond}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "23",
doi = "10.3389/fnhum.2017.00480",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "Frontiers in Human Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5161",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two mechanisms of sensorimotor set adaptation to inclined stance

AU - Lee, Kyoung Hyun

AU - Baksh, Asheeba

AU - Bryant, Alyssa

AU - McGowan, Mollie

AU - McMillan, Ryan

AU - Chong, Kwong Yew Raymond

PY - 2017/10/23

Y1 - 2017/10/23

N2 - Orientation of posture relative to the environment depends on the contributions from the somatosensory, vestibular, and visual systems mixed in varying proportions to produce a sensorimotor set. Here, we probed the sensorimotor set composition using a postural adaptation task in which healthy adults stood on an inclined surface for 3 min. Upon returning to a horizontal surface, participants displayed a range of postural orientations – from an aftereffect that consisted of a large forward postural lean to an upright stance with little or no aftereffect. It has been hypothesized that the post-incline postural change depends on each individual’s sensorimotor set: whether the set was dominated by the somatosensory or vestibular system: Somatosensory dominance would cause the lean aftereffect whereas vestibular dominance should steer stance posture toward upright orientation. We investigated the individuals who displayed somatosensory dominance by manipulating their attention to spatial orientation. We introduced a distraction condition in which subjects concurrently performed a difficult arithmetic subtraction task. This manipulation altered the time course of their post-incline aftereffect. When not distracted, participants returned to upright stance within the 3-min period. However, they continued leaning forward when distracted. These results suggest that the mechanism of sensorimotor set adaptation to inclined stance comprises at least two components. The first component reflects the dominant contribution from the somatosensory system. Since the postural lean was observed among these subjects even when they were not distracted, it suggests that the aftereffect is difficult to overcome. The second component includes a covert attentional component which manifests as the dissipation of the aftereffect and the return of posture to upright orientation.

AB - Orientation of posture relative to the environment depends on the contributions from the somatosensory, vestibular, and visual systems mixed in varying proportions to produce a sensorimotor set. Here, we probed the sensorimotor set composition using a postural adaptation task in which healthy adults stood on an inclined surface for 3 min. Upon returning to a horizontal surface, participants displayed a range of postural orientations – from an aftereffect that consisted of a large forward postural lean to an upright stance with little or no aftereffect. It has been hypothesized that the post-incline postural change depends on each individual’s sensorimotor set: whether the set was dominated by the somatosensory or vestibular system: Somatosensory dominance would cause the lean aftereffect whereas vestibular dominance should steer stance posture toward upright orientation. We investigated the individuals who displayed somatosensory dominance by manipulating their attention to spatial orientation. We introduced a distraction condition in which subjects concurrently performed a difficult arithmetic subtraction task. This manipulation altered the time course of their post-incline aftereffect. When not distracted, participants returned to upright stance within the 3-min period. However, they continued leaning forward when distracted. These results suggest that the mechanism of sensorimotor set adaptation to inclined stance comprises at least two components. The first component reflects the dominant contribution from the somatosensory system. Since the postural lean was observed among these subjects even when they were not distracted, it suggests that the aftereffect is difficult to overcome. The second component includes a covert attentional component which manifests as the dissipation of the aftereffect and the return of posture to upright orientation.

KW - Balance control

KW - Postural control

KW - Sensorimotor set

KW - Somatosensory

KW - Vestibular

KW - Vision

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032021846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032021846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00480

DO - 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00480

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85032021846

VL - 11

JO - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5161

M1 - 480

ER -