Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious Class V lesions.

W. D. Browning, W. W. Brackett, R. O. Gilpatrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this double-blind clinical trial was to compare the retention rate in noncarious Class V lesions of two resin-based composite restorative materials with contrasting stiffness. Isolation with retraction cord, pressed paper triangles, and cotton rolls was used to closely mimic the procedures generally used in a practice setting. Thirty pairs of restorations were placed, one using Silux Plus and one using Z100. The assignment of material was randomized, and the subjects were unaware of the material used. All restorations were placed with a fourth-generation adhesive liner, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Evaluations were performed at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months by two independent examiners using criteria developed by Cvar and Ryge in a forced consensus model. Examiners were unaware of the restoration's group identity. No difference between the retention rates for the two groups was found after 24 months, bringing into question the role that a material's stiffness plays in determining retention in a noncarious Class V lesion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-50
Number of pages5
JournalOperative Dentistry
Volume25
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Composite Resins
Adhesives
Clinical Trials
Silux Plus
Scotchbond Multi-Purpose

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious Class V lesions. / Browning, W. D.; Brackett, W. W.; Gilpatrick, R. O.

In: Operative Dentistry, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.01.2000, p. 46-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f0799d3263db4d7c985b290a66b0303c,
title = "Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious Class V lesions.",
abstract = "The purpose of this double-blind clinical trial was to compare the retention rate in noncarious Class V lesions of two resin-based composite restorative materials with contrasting stiffness. Isolation with retraction cord, pressed paper triangles, and cotton rolls was used to closely mimic the procedures generally used in a practice setting. Thirty pairs of restorations were placed, one using Silux Plus and one using Z100. The assignment of material was randomized, and the subjects were unaware of the material used. All restorations were placed with a fourth-generation adhesive liner, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Evaluations were performed at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months by two independent examiners using criteria developed by Cvar and Ryge in a forced consensus model. Examiners were unaware of the restoration's group identity. No difference between the retention rates for the two groups was found after 24 months, bringing into question the role that a material's stiffness plays in determining retention in a noncarious Class V lesion.",
author = "Browning, {W. D.} and Brackett, {W. W.} and Gilpatrick, {R. O.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "46--50",
journal = "Operative Dentistry",
issn = "0361-7734",
publisher = "Indiana University School of Dentistry",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious Class V lesions.

AU - Browning, W. D.

AU - Brackett, W. W.

AU - Gilpatrick, R. O.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this double-blind clinical trial was to compare the retention rate in noncarious Class V lesions of two resin-based composite restorative materials with contrasting stiffness. Isolation with retraction cord, pressed paper triangles, and cotton rolls was used to closely mimic the procedures generally used in a practice setting. Thirty pairs of restorations were placed, one using Silux Plus and one using Z100. The assignment of material was randomized, and the subjects were unaware of the material used. All restorations were placed with a fourth-generation adhesive liner, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Evaluations were performed at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months by two independent examiners using criteria developed by Cvar and Ryge in a forced consensus model. Examiners were unaware of the restoration's group identity. No difference between the retention rates for the two groups was found after 24 months, bringing into question the role that a material's stiffness plays in determining retention in a noncarious Class V lesion.

AB - The purpose of this double-blind clinical trial was to compare the retention rate in noncarious Class V lesions of two resin-based composite restorative materials with contrasting stiffness. Isolation with retraction cord, pressed paper triangles, and cotton rolls was used to closely mimic the procedures generally used in a practice setting. Thirty pairs of restorations were placed, one using Silux Plus and one using Z100. The assignment of material was randomized, and the subjects were unaware of the material used. All restorations were placed with a fourth-generation adhesive liner, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Evaluations were performed at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months by two independent examiners using criteria developed by Cvar and Ryge in a forced consensus model. Examiners were unaware of the restoration's group identity. No difference between the retention rates for the two groups was found after 24 months, bringing into question the role that a material's stiffness plays in determining retention in a noncarious Class V lesion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033754539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033754539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11203790

AN - SCOPUS:0033754539

VL - 25

SP - 46

EP - 50

JO - Operative Dentistry

JF - Operative Dentistry

SN - 0361-7734

IS - 1

ER -