Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.

W. W. Brackett, W. D. Browning, J. A. Ross, M. G. Brackett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compared the clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material over two years. Thirty-four pairs of restorations of Compoglass and Fuji II LC were placed in caries-free cervical erosion/abfraction lesions without tooth preparation. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months using modified Ryge/USPHS criteria. A significantly higher incidence of failed restorations was found with the polyacid-modified resin composite (p < 0.05).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-16
Number of pages5
JournalOperative Dentistry
Volume26
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Compomers
Root Caries
Tooth Preparation
United States Public Health Service
Composite Resins
Incidence
Compoglass
Clinical Studies
glass ionomer
Fuji II LC cement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. / Brackett, W. W.; Browning, W. D.; Ross, J. A.; Brackett, M. G.

In: Operative Dentistry, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.01.2001, p. 12-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1422835efaa44cb487cbd76b47e33fac,
title = "Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.",
abstract = "This study compared the clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material over two years. Thirty-four pairs of restorations of Compoglass and Fuji II LC were placed in caries-free cervical erosion/abfraction lesions without tooth preparation. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months using modified Ryge/USPHS criteria. A significantly higher incidence of failed restorations was found with the polyacid-modified resin composite (p < 0.05).",
author = "Brackett, {W. W.} and Browning, {W. D.} and Ross, {J. A.} and Brackett, {M. G.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "12--16",
journal = "Operative Dentistry",
issn = "0361-7734",
publisher = "Indiana University School of Dentistry",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.

AU - Brackett, W. W.

AU - Browning, W. D.

AU - Ross, J. A.

AU - Brackett, M. G.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - This study compared the clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material over two years. Thirty-four pairs of restorations of Compoglass and Fuji II LC were placed in caries-free cervical erosion/abfraction lesions without tooth preparation. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months using modified Ryge/USPHS criteria. A significantly higher incidence of failed restorations was found with the polyacid-modified resin composite (p < 0.05).

AB - This study compared the clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material over two years. Thirty-four pairs of restorations of Compoglass and Fuji II LC were placed in caries-free cervical erosion/abfraction lesions without tooth preparation. Restorations were clinically evaluated at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months using modified Ryge/USPHS criteria. A significantly higher incidence of failed restorations was found with the polyacid-modified resin composite (p < 0.05).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035227462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035227462&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 12

EP - 16

JO - Operative Dentistry

JF - Operative Dentistry

SN - 0361-7734

IS - 1

ER -