Ultrarapid diagnostic peritoneal lavage

Clement P. Cotter, Michael L Hawkins, Raleigh B. Kent, Robert P. Carraway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is an important adjunct in the evaluation of blunt trauma. The open technique has proven to be safer, though more time consuming, than the closed percutaneous technique. A significant time- consuming aspect of the procedure is the infusion and drainage of the peritoneal lavage fluid. With the use of cystoscopy irrigation tubing, infusion time for one liter of Ringer’s lactate averaged 2.9 minutes compared to 14.4 minutes when using IV fluid tubing. Similarly, effusion time was 2.3 minutes rather than 9.8 minutes. These differences are significant at the 0.0001 level. The average time saved was 19 minutes, allowing more rapid assessment and treatment of these critically injured patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)615-616
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1989

Fingerprint

Peritoneal Lavage
Cystoscopy
Ascitic Fluid
Drainage
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Ultrarapid diagnostic peritoneal lavage. / Cotter, Clement P.; Hawkins, Michael L; Kent, Raleigh B.; Carraway, Robert P.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 29, No. 5, 01.01.1989, p. 615-616.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cotter, Clement P. ; Hawkins, Michael L ; Kent, Raleigh B. ; Carraway, Robert P. / Ultrarapid diagnostic peritoneal lavage. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1989 ; Vol. 29, No. 5. pp. 615-616.
@article{3db065cfcf834a919431c5bf376e6b9d,
title = "Ultrarapid diagnostic peritoneal lavage",
abstract = "Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is an important adjunct in the evaluation of blunt trauma. The open technique has proven to be safer, though more time consuming, than the closed percutaneous technique. A significant time- consuming aspect of the procedure is the infusion and drainage of the peritoneal lavage fluid. With the use of cystoscopy irrigation tubing, infusion time for one liter of Ringer’s lactate averaged 2.9 minutes compared to 14.4 minutes when using IV fluid tubing. Similarly, effusion time was 2.3 minutes rather than 9.8 minutes. These differences are significant at the 0.0001 level. The average time saved was 19 minutes, allowing more rapid assessment and treatment of these critically injured patients.",
author = "Cotter, {Clement P.} and Hawkins, {Michael L} and Kent, {Raleigh B.} and Carraway, {Robert P.}",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00005373-198905000-00015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "615--616",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrarapid diagnostic peritoneal lavage

AU - Cotter, Clement P.

AU - Hawkins, Michael L

AU - Kent, Raleigh B.

AU - Carraway, Robert P.

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is an important adjunct in the evaluation of blunt trauma. The open technique has proven to be safer, though more time consuming, than the closed percutaneous technique. A significant time- consuming aspect of the procedure is the infusion and drainage of the peritoneal lavage fluid. With the use of cystoscopy irrigation tubing, infusion time for one liter of Ringer’s lactate averaged 2.9 minutes compared to 14.4 minutes when using IV fluid tubing. Similarly, effusion time was 2.3 minutes rather than 9.8 minutes. These differences are significant at the 0.0001 level. The average time saved was 19 minutes, allowing more rapid assessment and treatment of these critically injured patients.

AB - Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is an important adjunct in the evaluation of blunt trauma. The open technique has proven to be safer, though more time consuming, than the closed percutaneous technique. A significant time- consuming aspect of the procedure is the infusion and drainage of the peritoneal lavage fluid. With the use of cystoscopy irrigation tubing, infusion time for one liter of Ringer’s lactate averaged 2.9 minutes compared to 14.4 minutes when using IV fluid tubing. Similarly, effusion time was 2.3 minutes rather than 9.8 minutes. These differences are significant at the 0.0001 level. The average time saved was 19 minutes, allowing more rapid assessment and treatment of these critically injured patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024383186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024383186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005373-198905000-00015

DO - 10.1097/00005373-198905000-00015

M3 - Article

C2 - 2724379

AN - SCOPUS:0024383186

VL - 29

SP - 615

EP - 616

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 5

ER -