TY - JOUR
T1 - Upgrading on radical prostatectomy specimens of very low- And low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance
T2 - A population-level analysis
AU - Sayyid, Rashid K.
AU - Wilson, Brandon
AU - Benton, John Z.
AU - Lodh, Atul
AU - Thomas, Eric F.
AU - Goldberg, Hanan
AU - Madi, Rabii Hussein
AU - Terris, Martha K.
AU - Wallis, Christopher J.D.
AU - Klaassen, Zachary
N1 - Funding Information:
We utilized the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Prostate with Watchful Waiting database, which is a nationally representative database supported by the National Cancer Institute. This database captures men with incident PCa from 18 population-based registries, between 2010 and 2015, and covers approximately 30% of the US population (7). We included men younger than 80 years old with National Comprehensive Cancer Network very low-or low-risk PCa (8), who opted initially for AS and ultimately underwent an RP. No institutional review board approval was required for this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Canadian Urological Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12/15
Y1 - 2020/12/15
N2 - Introduction: A proportion of prostate cancer (PCa) patients initially managed with active surveillance (AS) are upgraded to a higher Gleason score (GS) at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP). Our objective was to determine predictors of upgrading on RP specimens using a national database. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Prostate with Watchful Waiting database was used to identify AS patients diagnosed with very low- or low-risk PCa who underwent delayed RP between 2010 and 2015. The primary outcome was upgrading to GS 7 disease or worse. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate demographic and oncological predictors of upgrading on final specimen. Results: A total of 3775 men underwent RP after a period of AS, 3541 (93.8%) of whom were cT2a; 792 (21.0%) patients were upgraded on RP specimen, with 85.4%, 10.6%, and 3.4% upgraded to GS 7(3+4), 7(4+3), and 8 diseases, respectively. On multivariable analysis, higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis (5–10 vs. 0–2 ng/ml, odd ratio [OR] 2.59, p<0.001) and percent core involvement (80–100% vs. 0–20%, OR 2.52, p=0.003) were significant predictors of upgrading on final RP specimen, whereas higher socioeconomic status predicted lower odds of upgrading (highest vs. lowest quartile OR 0.75, p=0.013). Conclusions: Higher baseline PSA and percent positive cores involvement are associated with significantly increased risk of upgrading on RP after AS, whereas higher socioeconomic status predicts lower odds of such events. These results may help identify patients at increased risk of adverse pathology on final specimen who may benefit from earlier definitive treatment.
AB - Introduction: A proportion of prostate cancer (PCa) patients initially managed with active surveillance (AS) are upgraded to a higher Gleason score (GS) at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP). Our objective was to determine predictors of upgrading on RP specimens using a national database. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Prostate with Watchful Waiting database was used to identify AS patients diagnosed with very low- or low-risk PCa who underwent delayed RP between 2010 and 2015. The primary outcome was upgrading to GS 7 disease or worse. Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate demographic and oncological predictors of upgrading on final specimen. Results: A total of 3775 men underwent RP after a period of AS, 3541 (93.8%) of whom were cT2a; 792 (21.0%) patients were upgraded on RP specimen, with 85.4%, 10.6%, and 3.4% upgraded to GS 7(3+4), 7(4+3), and 8 diseases, respectively. On multivariable analysis, higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis (5–10 vs. 0–2 ng/ml, odd ratio [OR] 2.59, p<0.001) and percent core involvement (80–100% vs. 0–20%, OR 2.52, p=0.003) were significant predictors of upgrading on final RP specimen, whereas higher socioeconomic status predicted lower odds of upgrading (highest vs. lowest quartile OR 0.75, p=0.013). Conclusions: Higher baseline PSA and percent positive cores involvement are associated with significantly increased risk of upgrading on RP after AS, whereas higher socioeconomic status predicts lower odds of such events. These results may help identify patients at increased risk of adverse pathology on final specimen who may benefit from earlier definitive treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098715730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098715730&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5489/CUAJ.6868
DO - 10.5489/CUAJ.6868
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85098715730
SN - 1911-6470
VL - 15
JO - Journal of the Canadian Urological Association
JF - Journal of the Canadian Urological Association
IS - 7
ER -