Using a cost-benefit analysis to estimate outcomes of a clinical treatment guideline

Testing the brain trauma foundation guidelines for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury

Mark Faul, Marlena M. Rutland-Brown, Wesley Frankel, Ernest E. Sullivent, Richard Warren Sattin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

135 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: A decade after promulgation of treatment guidelines by the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF), few studies exist that examine the application of these guidelines for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. These studies have reported both cost savings and reduced mortality. Materials: We projected the results of previous studies of BTF guideline adoption to estimate the impact of widespread adoption across the United States. We used surveillance systems and national surveys to estimate the number of severely injured TBI patients and compared the lifetime costs of BTF adoption to the current state of treatment. Results: After examining the health outcomes and costs, we estimated that a substantial savings in annual medical costs ($262 million), annual rehabilitation costs ($43 million) and lifetime societal costs ($3.84 billion) would be achieved if treatment guidelines were used more routinely. Implementation costs were estimated to be $61 million. The net savings were primarily because of better health outcomes and a decreased burden on lifetime social support systems. We also estimate that mortality would be reduced by 3,607 lives if the guidelines were followed. Conclusions: Widespread adoption of the BTF guidelines for the treatment of severe TBI would result in substantial savings in costs and lives. The majority of cost savings are societal costs. Further validation work to identify the most effective aspects of the BTF guidelines is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1271-1278
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Trauma
Volume63
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Cost-Benefit Analysis
Guidelines
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cost Savings
Therapeutics
Mortality
Traumatic Brain Injury
Social Support
Health Care Costs
Rehabilitation
Health

Keywords

  • Acute care
  • Cost benefit
  • Glasgow Outcome Score
  • Rehabilitation
  • Societal impact
  • TBI
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Treatment guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Using a cost-benefit analysis to estimate outcomes of a clinical treatment guideline : Testing the brain trauma foundation guidelines for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury. / Faul, Mark; Rutland-Brown, Marlena M.; Frankel, Wesley; Sullivent, Ernest E.; Sattin, Richard Warren.

In: Journal of Trauma, Vol. 63, No. 6, 01.01.2007, p. 1271-1278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Faul, Mark ; Rutland-Brown, Marlena M. ; Frankel, Wesley ; Sullivent, Ernest E. ; Sattin, Richard Warren. / Using a cost-benefit analysis to estimate outcomes of a clinical treatment guideline : Testing the brain trauma foundation guidelines for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury. In: Journal of Trauma. 2007 ; Vol. 63, No. 6. pp. 1271-1278.
@article{d691ef66be454a5d9cb38a6d7f49daa9,
title = "Using a cost-benefit analysis to estimate outcomes of a clinical treatment guideline: Testing the brain trauma foundation guidelines for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury",
abstract = "Background: A decade after promulgation of treatment guidelines by the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF), few studies exist that examine the application of these guidelines for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. These studies have reported both cost savings and reduced mortality. Materials: We projected the results of previous studies of BTF guideline adoption to estimate the impact of widespread adoption across the United States. We used surveillance systems and national surveys to estimate the number of severely injured TBI patients and compared the lifetime costs of BTF adoption to the current state of treatment. Results: After examining the health outcomes and costs, we estimated that a substantial savings in annual medical costs ($262 million), annual rehabilitation costs ($43 million) and lifetime societal costs ($3.84 billion) would be achieved if treatment guidelines were used more routinely. Implementation costs were estimated to be $61 million. The net savings were primarily because of better health outcomes and a decreased burden on lifetime social support systems. We also estimate that mortality would be reduced by 3,607 lives if the guidelines were followed. Conclusions: Widespread adoption of the BTF guidelines for the treatment of severe TBI would result in substantial savings in costs and lives. The majority of cost savings are societal costs. Further validation work to identify the most effective aspects of the BTF guidelines is warranted.",
keywords = "Acute care, Cost benefit, Glasgow Outcome Score, Rehabilitation, Societal impact, TBI, Traumatic brain injury, Treatment guidelines",
author = "Mark Faul and Rutland-Brown, {Marlena M.} and Wesley Frankel and Sullivent, {Ernest E.} and Sattin, {Richard Warren}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e3181493080",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "1271--1278",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using a cost-benefit analysis to estimate outcomes of a clinical treatment guideline

T2 - Testing the brain trauma foundation guidelines for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury

AU - Faul, Mark

AU - Rutland-Brown, Marlena M.

AU - Frankel, Wesley

AU - Sullivent, Ernest E.

AU - Sattin, Richard Warren

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - Background: A decade after promulgation of treatment guidelines by the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF), few studies exist that examine the application of these guidelines for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. These studies have reported both cost savings and reduced mortality. Materials: We projected the results of previous studies of BTF guideline adoption to estimate the impact of widespread adoption across the United States. We used surveillance systems and national surveys to estimate the number of severely injured TBI patients and compared the lifetime costs of BTF adoption to the current state of treatment. Results: After examining the health outcomes and costs, we estimated that a substantial savings in annual medical costs ($262 million), annual rehabilitation costs ($43 million) and lifetime societal costs ($3.84 billion) would be achieved if treatment guidelines were used more routinely. Implementation costs were estimated to be $61 million. The net savings were primarily because of better health outcomes and a decreased burden on lifetime social support systems. We also estimate that mortality would be reduced by 3,607 lives if the guidelines were followed. Conclusions: Widespread adoption of the BTF guidelines for the treatment of severe TBI would result in substantial savings in costs and lives. The majority of cost savings are societal costs. Further validation work to identify the most effective aspects of the BTF guidelines is warranted.

AB - Background: A decade after promulgation of treatment guidelines by the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF), few studies exist that examine the application of these guidelines for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. These studies have reported both cost savings and reduced mortality. Materials: We projected the results of previous studies of BTF guideline adoption to estimate the impact of widespread adoption across the United States. We used surveillance systems and national surveys to estimate the number of severely injured TBI patients and compared the lifetime costs of BTF adoption to the current state of treatment. Results: After examining the health outcomes and costs, we estimated that a substantial savings in annual medical costs ($262 million), annual rehabilitation costs ($43 million) and lifetime societal costs ($3.84 billion) would be achieved if treatment guidelines were used more routinely. Implementation costs were estimated to be $61 million. The net savings were primarily because of better health outcomes and a decreased burden on lifetime social support systems. We also estimate that mortality would be reduced by 3,607 lives if the guidelines were followed. Conclusions: Widespread adoption of the BTF guidelines for the treatment of severe TBI would result in substantial savings in costs and lives. The majority of cost savings are societal costs. Further validation work to identify the most effective aspects of the BTF guidelines is warranted.

KW - Acute care

KW - Cost benefit

KW - Glasgow Outcome Score

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Societal impact

KW - TBI

KW - Traumatic brain injury

KW - Treatment guidelines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38949126991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38949126991&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181493080

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181493080

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 1271

EP - 1278

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 6

ER -