Using ranked auxiliary covariate as a more efficient sampling design for ANCOVA model

Analysis of a psychological intervention to buttress resilience

Rajai Jabrah, Hani M. Samawi, Robert Vogel, Haresh D. Rochani, Daniel F Linder, Jeff Klibert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Drawing a sample can be costly or time consuming in some studies. However, it may be possible to rank the sampling units according to some baseline auxiliary covariates, which are easily obtainable, and/or cost efficient. Ranked set sampling (RSS) is a method to achieve this goal. In this paper, we propose a modified approach of the RSS method to allocate units into an experimental study that compares L groups. Computer simulation estimates the empirical nominal values and the empirical power values for the test procedure of comparing L different groups using modified RSS based on the regression approach in analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models. A comparison to simple random sampling (SRS) is made to demonstrate efficiency. The results indicate that the required sample sizes for a given precision are smaller under RSS than under SRS. The modified RSS protocol was applied to an experimental study. The experimental study was designed to obtain a better understanding of the pathways by which positive experiences (i.e., goal completion) contribute to higher levels of happiness, well-being, and life satisfaction. The use of the RSS method resulted in a cost reduction associated with smaller sample size without losing the precision of the analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-254
Number of pages14
JournalCommunications for Statistical Applications and Methods
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2017

Fingerprint

Ranked Set Sampling
Analysis of Covariance
Sampling Design
Resilience
Model Analysis
Covariates
Sampling
Experimental Study
Simple Random Sampling
Sampling Methods
Unit
Small Sample Size
Costs
Categorical or nominal
Completion
Psychological
Baseline
Pathway
Sample Size
Computer Simulation

Keywords

  • ANCOVA
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Emotional uplifting intervention
  • Empirical power
  • Multiple regression
  • Ranked auxiliary covariate
  • Ranked set sampling
  • Reduced sample size
  • Sampling design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Modeling and Simulation
  • Finance
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Applied Mathematics

Cite this

Using ranked auxiliary covariate as a more efficient sampling design for ANCOVA model : Analysis of a psychological intervention to buttress resilience. / Jabrah, Rajai; Samawi, Hani M.; Vogel, Robert; Rochani, Haresh D.; Linder, Daniel F; Klibert, Jeff.

In: Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.05.2017, p. 241-254.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{704446c3d428462ba2b1fb71446eff5d,
title = "Using ranked auxiliary covariate as a more efficient sampling design for ANCOVA model: Analysis of a psychological intervention to buttress resilience",
abstract = "Drawing a sample can be costly or time consuming in some studies. However, it may be possible to rank the sampling units according to some baseline auxiliary covariates, which are easily obtainable, and/or cost efficient. Ranked set sampling (RSS) is a method to achieve this goal. In this paper, we propose a modified approach of the RSS method to allocate units into an experimental study that compares L groups. Computer simulation estimates the empirical nominal values and the empirical power values for the test procedure of comparing L different groups using modified RSS based on the regression approach in analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models. A comparison to simple random sampling (SRS) is made to demonstrate efficiency. The results indicate that the required sample sizes for a given precision are smaller under RSS than under SRS. The modified RSS protocol was applied to an experimental study. The experimental study was designed to obtain a better understanding of the pathways by which positive experiences (i.e., goal completion) contribute to higher levels of happiness, well-being, and life satisfaction. The use of the RSS method resulted in a cost reduction associated with smaller sample size without losing the precision of the analysis.",
keywords = "ANCOVA, Cost-effectiveness, Emotional uplifting intervention, Empirical power, Multiple regression, Ranked auxiliary covariate, Ranked set sampling, Reduced sample size, Sampling design",
author = "Rajai Jabrah and Samawi, {Hani M.} and Robert Vogel and Rochani, {Haresh D.} and Linder, {Daniel F} and Jeff Klibert",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5351/CSAM.2017.24.3.241",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "241--254",
journal = "Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods",
issn = "2287-7843",
publisher = "Korean Statistical Society",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using ranked auxiliary covariate as a more efficient sampling design for ANCOVA model

T2 - Analysis of a psychological intervention to buttress resilience

AU - Jabrah, Rajai

AU - Samawi, Hani M.

AU - Vogel, Robert

AU - Rochani, Haresh D.

AU - Linder, Daniel F

AU - Klibert, Jeff

PY - 2017/5/1

Y1 - 2017/5/1

N2 - Drawing a sample can be costly or time consuming in some studies. However, it may be possible to rank the sampling units according to some baseline auxiliary covariates, which are easily obtainable, and/or cost efficient. Ranked set sampling (RSS) is a method to achieve this goal. In this paper, we propose a modified approach of the RSS method to allocate units into an experimental study that compares L groups. Computer simulation estimates the empirical nominal values and the empirical power values for the test procedure of comparing L different groups using modified RSS based on the regression approach in analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models. A comparison to simple random sampling (SRS) is made to demonstrate efficiency. The results indicate that the required sample sizes for a given precision are smaller under RSS than under SRS. The modified RSS protocol was applied to an experimental study. The experimental study was designed to obtain a better understanding of the pathways by which positive experiences (i.e., goal completion) contribute to higher levels of happiness, well-being, and life satisfaction. The use of the RSS method resulted in a cost reduction associated with smaller sample size without losing the precision of the analysis.

AB - Drawing a sample can be costly or time consuming in some studies. However, it may be possible to rank the sampling units according to some baseline auxiliary covariates, which are easily obtainable, and/or cost efficient. Ranked set sampling (RSS) is a method to achieve this goal. In this paper, we propose a modified approach of the RSS method to allocate units into an experimental study that compares L groups. Computer simulation estimates the empirical nominal values and the empirical power values for the test procedure of comparing L different groups using modified RSS based on the regression approach in analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models. A comparison to simple random sampling (SRS) is made to demonstrate efficiency. The results indicate that the required sample sizes for a given precision are smaller under RSS than under SRS. The modified RSS protocol was applied to an experimental study. The experimental study was designed to obtain a better understanding of the pathways by which positive experiences (i.e., goal completion) contribute to higher levels of happiness, well-being, and life satisfaction. The use of the RSS method resulted in a cost reduction associated with smaller sample size without losing the precision of the analysis.

KW - ANCOVA

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Emotional uplifting intervention

KW - Empirical power

KW - Multiple regression

KW - Ranked auxiliary covariate

KW - Ranked set sampling

KW - Reduced sample size

KW - Sampling design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044080082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044080082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5351/CSAM.2017.24.3.241

DO - 10.5351/CSAM.2017.24.3.241

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 241

EP - 254

JO - Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods

JF - Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods

SN - 2287-7843

IS - 3

ER -