Utility of the Inventory of Legal Knowledge in detecting feigning

Kevin D. Wahl, Michael J Vitacco, Nancy Ryba Panza, Trevor F. Hyde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Inventory of Legal Knowledge (ILK) is an instrument designed to detect feigning of competency-specific knowledge deficits. Available studies have suggested the ILK may require modification of its cut score to more accurately classify those who are feigning. In this study, the ILK’s concurrent validity and cut scores were tested using 100 college students in a simulation design. Students were randomly assigned to fake (n = 50) or honest (n = 50) groups. Those assigned to the faking group had significantly lower ILK scores than individuals responding honestly with a large effect size between the groups. Despite some promising results, utility estimates indicated an unacceptable level of false positives using the recommended cut score. Tentative recommendations are made in order to improve the efficacy of the ILK in detecting feigning legal knowledge.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)483-497
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2018

Fingerprint

Equipment and Supplies
Students

Keywords

  • Inventory of Legal Knowledge
  • competency to proceed to trial
  • feigning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Utility of the Inventory of Legal Knowledge in detecting feigning. / Wahl, Kevin D.; Vitacco, Michael J; Panza, Nancy Ryba; Hyde, Trevor F.

In: Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 3, 04.05.2018, p. 483-497.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wahl, Kevin D. ; Vitacco, Michael J ; Panza, Nancy Ryba ; Hyde, Trevor F. / Utility of the Inventory of Legal Knowledge in detecting feigning. In: Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 2018 ; Vol. 29, No. 3. pp. 483-497.
@article{ad6b50e4ece44a71a4af898ac29dd117,
title = "Utility of the Inventory of Legal Knowledge in detecting feigning",
abstract = "The Inventory of Legal Knowledge (ILK) is an instrument designed to detect feigning of competency-specific knowledge deficits. Available studies have suggested the ILK may require modification of its cut score to more accurately classify those who are feigning. In this study, the ILK’s concurrent validity and cut scores were tested using 100 college students in a simulation design. Students were randomly assigned to fake (n = 50) or honest (n = 50) groups. Those assigned to the faking group had significantly lower ILK scores than individuals responding honestly with a large effect size between the groups. Despite some promising results, utility estimates indicated an unacceptable level of false positives using the recommended cut score. Tentative recommendations are made in order to improve the efficacy of the ILK in detecting feigning legal knowledge.",
keywords = "Inventory of Legal Knowledge, competency to proceed to trial, feigning",
author = "Wahl, {Kevin D.} and Vitacco, {Michael J} and Panza, {Nancy Ryba} and Hyde, {Trevor F.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/14789949.2017.1421249",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "483--497",
journal = "Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology",
issn = "1478-9949",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utility of the Inventory of Legal Knowledge in detecting feigning

AU - Wahl, Kevin D.

AU - Vitacco, Michael J

AU - Panza, Nancy Ryba

AU - Hyde, Trevor F.

PY - 2018/5/4

Y1 - 2018/5/4

N2 - The Inventory of Legal Knowledge (ILK) is an instrument designed to detect feigning of competency-specific knowledge deficits. Available studies have suggested the ILK may require modification of its cut score to more accurately classify those who are feigning. In this study, the ILK’s concurrent validity and cut scores were tested using 100 college students in a simulation design. Students were randomly assigned to fake (n = 50) or honest (n = 50) groups. Those assigned to the faking group had significantly lower ILK scores than individuals responding honestly with a large effect size between the groups. Despite some promising results, utility estimates indicated an unacceptable level of false positives using the recommended cut score. Tentative recommendations are made in order to improve the efficacy of the ILK in detecting feigning legal knowledge.

AB - The Inventory of Legal Knowledge (ILK) is an instrument designed to detect feigning of competency-specific knowledge deficits. Available studies have suggested the ILK may require modification of its cut score to more accurately classify those who are feigning. In this study, the ILK’s concurrent validity and cut scores were tested using 100 college students in a simulation design. Students were randomly assigned to fake (n = 50) or honest (n = 50) groups. Those assigned to the faking group had significantly lower ILK scores than individuals responding honestly with a large effect size between the groups. Despite some promising results, utility estimates indicated an unacceptable level of false positives using the recommended cut score. Tentative recommendations are made in order to improve the efficacy of the ILK in detecting feigning legal knowledge.

KW - Inventory of Legal Knowledge

KW - competency to proceed to trial

KW - feigning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044476629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044476629&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14789949.2017.1421249

DO - 10.1080/14789949.2017.1421249

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044476629

VL - 29

SP - 483

EP - 497

JO - Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology

JF - Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology

SN - 1478-9949

IS - 3

ER -