Validation of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based algorithm for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts (PP)

J. B. Mundorf, P. M. Ahearne, R. A. Vallera, John Paul Affronti, P. S. Jowell, M. S. Branch, T. N. Pappas, J. Baillie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Our previously published algorithm for management of PP1 assumed that (a) recurrence rates after percutaneous management are related to the presence of pancreatic duct (PD) obstruction or PP communication with the PD and (b) surgical management results in fewer recurrences but more complications. It followed that percutaneous management might best be reserved for patients (pts) without these findings. Since we published the algorithm, greater than 90% of elective PP pts have undergone ERCP in order to validate these assumptions. In an effort to challenge the assumptions, percutaneous management was used when possible. Methods: The records of 111 pts with PP treated since 1991 were reviewed. Health status, comorbidities, PP characteristics, PD anatomy, management strategy, and outcome (success, recurrence, or complication) were assessed. Results: 21/111 pts did not have PD imaging (7 emergent, 8 failed, 6 not attempted). 6/18 pts with obstruction, communication or both who were managed percutaneously succeeded (no recurrence or complication). 22/32 pts with these abnormalities who were managed surgically or with endoscopic cystgastrostomy or duodenostomy succeeded. 8/12 pts without significant ductal abnormalities were successfully managed percutaneously, although 2 successes required post procedure drain manipulation. 6/7 surgically managed pts without PD abnormalities succeeded. 7 pts were managed with endoscopic stents (2 failures) and 14 pts were observed with success. Overall, 33/44 (75%) interventions that followed and 17/32 (53%) interventions that did not follow the algorithm succeeded (p = < 0.05). Pts in the two groups were well matched in terms of age, physical status, comorbidities and size, number and location of PP. Conclusions: Our review confirms the assumptions of the previously published algorithm that pts with PD obstruction or PP communication with the PD do poorly with percutaneous management and are better managed surgically or by endoscopic decompression in selected cases. Pts without these abnormalities may warrant percutaneous management as a first approach.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume43
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Pancreatic Pseudocyst
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Pancreatic Ducts
Recurrence
Communication
Comorbidity
Duodenostomy
Decompression
Health Status
Stents
Anatomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Validation of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based algorithm for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts (PP). / Mundorf, J. B.; Ahearne, P. M.; Vallera, R. A.; Affronti, John Paul; Jowell, P. S.; Branch, M. S.; Pappas, T. N.; Baillie, J.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 43, No. 4, 01.01.1996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mundorf, J. B. ; Ahearne, P. M. ; Vallera, R. A. ; Affronti, John Paul ; Jowell, P. S. ; Branch, M. S. ; Pappas, T. N. ; Baillie, J. / Validation of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based algorithm for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts (PP). In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1996 ; Vol. 43, No. 4.
@article{156a9dd9a0aa474087f17717c9aeb313,
title = "Validation of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based algorithm for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts (PP)",
abstract = "Background: Our previously published algorithm for management of PP1 assumed that (a) recurrence rates after percutaneous management are related to the presence of pancreatic duct (PD) obstruction or PP communication with the PD and (b) surgical management results in fewer recurrences but more complications. It followed that percutaneous management might best be reserved for patients (pts) without these findings. Since we published the algorithm, greater than 90{\%} of elective PP pts have undergone ERCP in order to validate these assumptions. In an effort to challenge the assumptions, percutaneous management was used when possible. Methods: The records of 111 pts with PP treated since 1991 were reviewed. Health status, comorbidities, PP characteristics, PD anatomy, management strategy, and outcome (success, recurrence, or complication) were assessed. Results: 21/111 pts did not have PD imaging (7 emergent, 8 failed, 6 not attempted). 6/18 pts with obstruction, communication or both who were managed percutaneously succeeded (no recurrence or complication). 22/32 pts with these abnormalities who were managed surgically or with endoscopic cystgastrostomy or duodenostomy succeeded. 8/12 pts without significant ductal abnormalities were successfully managed percutaneously, although 2 successes required post procedure drain manipulation. 6/7 surgically managed pts without PD abnormalities succeeded. 7 pts were managed with endoscopic stents (2 failures) and 14 pts were observed with success. Overall, 33/44 (75{\%}) interventions that followed and 17/32 (53{\%}) interventions that did not follow the algorithm succeeded (p = < 0.05). Pts in the two groups were well matched in terms of age, physical status, comorbidities and size, number and location of PP. Conclusions: Our review confirms the assumptions of the previously published algorithm that pts with PD obstruction or PP communication with the PD do poorly with percutaneous management and are better managed surgically or by endoscopic decompression in selected cases. Pts without these abnormalities may warrant percutaneous management as a first approach.",
author = "Mundorf, {J. B.} and Ahearne, {P. M.} and Vallera, {R. A.} and Affronti, {John Paul} and Jowell, {P. S.} and Branch, {M. S.} and Pappas, {T. N.} and J. Baillie",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0016-5107(96)80478-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based algorithm for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts (PP)

AU - Mundorf, J. B.

AU - Ahearne, P. M.

AU - Vallera, R. A.

AU - Affronti, John Paul

AU - Jowell, P. S.

AU - Branch, M. S.

AU - Pappas, T. N.

AU - Baillie, J.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - Background: Our previously published algorithm for management of PP1 assumed that (a) recurrence rates after percutaneous management are related to the presence of pancreatic duct (PD) obstruction or PP communication with the PD and (b) surgical management results in fewer recurrences but more complications. It followed that percutaneous management might best be reserved for patients (pts) without these findings. Since we published the algorithm, greater than 90% of elective PP pts have undergone ERCP in order to validate these assumptions. In an effort to challenge the assumptions, percutaneous management was used when possible. Methods: The records of 111 pts with PP treated since 1991 were reviewed. Health status, comorbidities, PP characteristics, PD anatomy, management strategy, and outcome (success, recurrence, or complication) were assessed. Results: 21/111 pts did not have PD imaging (7 emergent, 8 failed, 6 not attempted). 6/18 pts with obstruction, communication or both who were managed percutaneously succeeded (no recurrence or complication). 22/32 pts with these abnormalities who were managed surgically or with endoscopic cystgastrostomy or duodenostomy succeeded. 8/12 pts without significant ductal abnormalities were successfully managed percutaneously, although 2 successes required post procedure drain manipulation. 6/7 surgically managed pts without PD abnormalities succeeded. 7 pts were managed with endoscopic stents (2 failures) and 14 pts were observed with success. Overall, 33/44 (75%) interventions that followed and 17/32 (53%) interventions that did not follow the algorithm succeeded (p = < 0.05). Pts in the two groups were well matched in terms of age, physical status, comorbidities and size, number and location of PP. Conclusions: Our review confirms the assumptions of the previously published algorithm that pts with PD obstruction or PP communication with the PD do poorly with percutaneous management and are better managed surgically or by endoscopic decompression in selected cases. Pts without these abnormalities may warrant percutaneous management as a first approach.

AB - Background: Our previously published algorithm for management of PP1 assumed that (a) recurrence rates after percutaneous management are related to the presence of pancreatic duct (PD) obstruction or PP communication with the PD and (b) surgical management results in fewer recurrences but more complications. It followed that percutaneous management might best be reserved for patients (pts) without these findings. Since we published the algorithm, greater than 90% of elective PP pts have undergone ERCP in order to validate these assumptions. In an effort to challenge the assumptions, percutaneous management was used when possible. Methods: The records of 111 pts with PP treated since 1991 were reviewed. Health status, comorbidities, PP characteristics, PD anatomy, management strategy, and outcome (success, recurrence, or complication) were assessed. Results: 21/111 pts did not have PD imaging (7 emergent, 8 failed, 6 not attempted). 6/18 pts with obstruction, communication or both who were managed percutaneously succeeded (no recurrence or complication). 22/32 pts with these abnormalities who were managed surgically or with endoscopic cystgastrostomy or duodenostomy succeeded. 8/12 pts without significant ductal abnormalities were successfully managed percutaneously, although 2 successes required post procedure drain manipulation. 6/7 surgically managed pts without PD abnormalities succeeded. 7 pts were managed with endoscopic stents (2 failures) and 14 pts were observed with success. Overall, 33/44 (75%) interventions that followed and 17/32 (53%) interventions that did not follow the algorithm succeeded (p = < 0.05). Pts in the two groups were well matched in terms of age, physical status, comorbidities and size, number and location of PP. Conclusions: Our review confirms the assumptions of the previously published algorithm that pts with PD obstruction or PP communication with the PD do poorly with percutaneous management and are better managed surgically or by endoscopic decompression in selected cases. Pts without these abnormalities may warrant percutaneous management as a first approach.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344417678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0344417678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0016-5107(96)80478-0

DO - 10.1016/S0016-5107(96)80478-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0344417678

VL - 43

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 4

ER -