Validity and reliability of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10)

Peter C. Belafsky, Debbie A. Mouadeb, Catherine J. Rees, Jan C. Pryor, Gregory N Postma, Jacqueline Allen, Rebecca J. Leonard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

320 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The Eating Assessment Tool is a self-administered, symptom-specific outcome instrument for dysphagia. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Methods: The investigation consisted of 4 phases: 1) line-item generation, 2) line-item reduction and reliability, 3) normative data generation, and 4) validity analysis. All data were collected prospectively. Internal consistency was assessed with the Cronbach alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated with the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient. Normative data were obtained by administering the instrument to a community cohort of healthy volunteers. Validity was assessed by administering the instrument before and after dysphagia treatment and by evaluating survey differences between normal persons and those with known diagnoses. Results: A total of 629 surveys were administered to 482 patients. The internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) of the final instrument was 0.960. The test-retest intra-item correlation coefficients ranged from 0.72 to 0.91. The mean (±SD) EAT-10 score of the normal cohort was 0.40 ± 1.01. The mean EAT-10 score was 23.58 ± 13.18 for patients with esophageal dysphagia, 23.10 ± 12.22 for those with oropharyngeal dysphagia, 9.19 ± 12.60 for those with voice disorders, 22.42 ± 14.06 for those with head and neck cancer, and 11.71 ± 9.61 for those with reflux. The patients with oropharyngeal and esophageal dysphagia and a history of head and neck cancer had a significantly higher EAT-10 score than did those with reflux or voice disorders (p < 0.001). The mean EAT-10 score of the patients with dysphagia improved from 19.87 ± 10.5 to 5.2 ± 7.4 after treatment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The EAT-10 has displayed excellent internal consistency, test-retest reproducibility, and criterion-based validity. The normative data suggest that an EAT-10 score of 3 or higher is abnormal. The instrument may be utilized to document the initial dysphagia severity and monitor the treatment response in persons with a wide array of swallowing disorders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)919-924
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology
Volume117
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

Fingerprint

Deglutition Disorders
Reproducibility of Results
Eating
Voice Disorders
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Healthy Volunteers
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Data collection
  • Dysphagia
  • Outcome assessment
  • Quality of life
  • Questionnaire
  • SWAL-QOL
  • Survey
  • Swallowing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Belafsky, P. C., Mouadeb, D. A., Rees, C. J., Pryor, J. C., Postma, G. N., Allen, J., & Leonard, R. J. (2008). Validity and reliability of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 117(12), 919-924. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940811701210

Validity and reliability of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). / Belafsky, Peter C.; Mouadeb, Debbie A.; Rees, Catherine J.; Pryor, Jan C.; Postma, Gregory N; Allen, Jacqueline; Leonard, Rebecca J.

In: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Vol. 117, No. 12, 01.01.2008, p. 919-924.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Belafsky, PC, Mouadeb, DA, Rees, CJ, Pryor, JC, Postma, GN, Allen, J & Leonard, RJ 2008, 'Validity and reliability of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10)', Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, vol. 117, no. 12, pp. 919-924. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940811701210
Belafsky, Peter C. ; Mouadeb, Debbie A. ; Rees, Catherine J. ; Pryor, Jan C. ; Postma, Gregory N ; Allen, Jacqueline ; Leonard, Rebecca J. / Validity and reliability of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). In: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology. 2008 ; Vol. 117, No. 12. pp. 919-924.
@article{9b0914bcb0064ca0b12c9a35f1642069,
title = "Validity and reliability of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10)",
abstract = "Objectives: The Eating Assessment Tool is a self-administered, symptom-specific outcome instrument for dysphagia. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Methods: The investigation consisted of 4 phases: 1) line-item generation, 2) line-item reduction and reliability, 3) normative data generation, and 4) validity analysis. All data were collected prospectively. Internal consistency was assessed with the Cronbach alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated with the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient. Normative data were obtained by administering the instrument to a community cohort of healthy volunteers. Validity was assessed by administering the instrument before and after dysphagia treatment and by evaluating survey differences between normal persons and those with known diagnoses. Results: A total of 629 surveys were administered to 482 patients. The internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) of the final instrument was 0.960. The test-retest intra-item correlation coefficients ranged from 0.72 to 0.91. The mean (±SD) EAT-10 score of the normal cohort was 0.40 ± 1.01. The mean EAT-10 score was 23.58 ± 13.18 for patients with esophageal dysphagia, 23.10 ± 12.22 for those with oropharyngeal dysphagia, 9.19 ± 12.60 for those with voice disorders, 22.42 ± 14.06 for those with head and neck cancer, and 11.71 ± 9.61 for those with reflux. The patients with oropharyngeal and esophageal dysphagia and a history of head and neck cancer had a significantly higher EAT-10 score than did those with reflux or voice disorders (p < 0.001). The mean EAT-10 score of the patients with dysphagia improved from 19.87 ± 10.5 to 5.2 ± 7.4 after treatment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The EAT-10 has displayed excellent internal consistency, test-retest reproducibility, and criterion-based validity. The normative data suggest that an EAT-10 score of 3 or higher is abnormal. The instrument may be utilized to document the initial dysphagia severity and monitor the treatment response in persons with a wide array of swallowing disorders.",
keywords = "Data collection, Dysphagia, Outcome assessment, Quality of life, Questionnaire, SWAL-QOL, Survey, Swallowing",
author = "Belafsky, {Peter C.} and Mouadeb, {Debbie A.} and Rees, {Catherine J.} and Pryor, {Jan C.} and Postma, {Gregory N} and Jacqueline Allen and Leonard, {Rebecca J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/000348940811701210",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "919--924",
journal = "Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology",
issn = "0003-4894",
publisher = "Annals Publishing Company",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity and reliability of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10)

AU - Belafsky, Peter C.

AU - Mouadeb, Debbie A.

AU - Rees, Catherine J.

AU - Pryor, Jan C.

AU - Postma, Gregory N

AU - Allen, Jacqueline

AU - Leonard, Rebecca J.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - Objectives: The Eating Assessment Tool is a self-administered, symptom-specific outcome instrument for dysphagia. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Methods: The investigation consisted of 4 phases: 1) line-item generation, 2) line-item reduction and reliability, 3) normative data generation, and 4) validity analysis. All data were collected prospectively. Internal consistency was assessed with the Cronbach alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated with the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient. Normative data were obtained by administering the instrument to a community cohort of healthy volunteers. Validity was assessed by administering the instrument before and after dysphagia treatment and by evaluating survey differences between normal persons and those with known diagnoses. Results: A total of 629 surveys were administered to 482 patients. The internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) of the final instrument was 0.960. The test-retest intra-item correlation coefficients ranged from 0.72 to 0.91. The mean (±SD) EAT-10 score of the normal cohort was 0.40 ± 1.01. The mean EAT-10 score was 23.58 ± 13.18 for patients with esophageal dysphagia, 23.10 ± 12.22 for those with oropharyngeal dysphagia, 9.19 ± 12.60 for those with voice disorders, 22.42 ± 14.06 for those with head and neck cancer, and 11.71 ± 9.61 for those with reflux. The patients with oropharyngeal and esophageal dysphagia and a history of head and neck cancer had a significantly higher EAT-10 score than did those with reflux or voice disorders (p < 0.001). The mean EAT-10 score of the patients with dysphagia improved from 19.87 ± 10.5 to 5.2 ± 7.4 after treatment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The EAT-10 has displayed excellent internal consistency, test-retest reproducibility, and criterion-based validity. The normative data suggest that an EAT-10 score of 3 or higher is abnormal. The instrument may be utilized to document the initial dysphagia severity and monitor the treatment response in persons with a wide array of swallowing disorders.

AB - Objectives: The Eating Assessment Tool is a self-administered, symptom-specific outcome instrument for dysphagia. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Methods: The investigation consisted of 4 phases: 1) line-item generation, 2) line-item reduction and reliability, 3) normative data generation, and 4) validity analysis. All data were collected prospectively. Internal consistency was assessed with the Cronbach alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated with the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient. Normative data were obtained by administering the instrument to a community cohort of healthy volunteers. Validity was assessed by administering the instrument before and after dysphagia treatment and by evaluating survey differences between normal persons and those with known diagnoses. Results: A total of 629 surveys were administered to 482 patients. The internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) of the final instrument was 0.960. The test-retest intra-item correlation coefficients ranged from 0.72 to 0.91. The mean (±SD) EAT-10 score of the normal cohort was 0.40 ± 1.01. The mean EAT-10 score was 23.58 ± 13.18 for patients with esophageal dysphagia, 23.10 ± 12.22 for those with oropharyngeal dysphagia, 9.19 ± 12.60 for those with voice disorders, 22.42 ± 14.06 for those with head and neck cancer, and 11.71 ± 9.61 for those with reflux. The patients with oropharyngeal and esophageal dysphagia and a history of head and neck cancer had a significantly higher EAT-10 score than did those with reflux or voice disorders (p < 0.001). The mean EAT-10 score of the patients with dysphagia improved from 19.87 ± 10.5 to 5.2 ± 7.4 after treatment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The EAT-10 has displayed excellent internal consistency, test-retest reproducibility, and criterion-based validity. The normative data suggest that an EAT-10 score of 3 or higher is abnormal. The instrument may be utilized to document the initial dysphagia severity and monitor the treatment response in persons with a wide array of swallowing disorders.

KW - Data collection

KW - Dysphagia

KW - Outcome assessment

KW - Quality of life

KW - Questionnaire

KW - SWAL-QOL

KW - Survey

KW - Swallowing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59649110085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59649110085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/000348940811701210

DO - 10.1177/000348940811701210

M3 - Article

C2 - 19140539

AN - SCOPUS:59649110085

VL - 117

SP - 919

EP - 924

JO - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

JF - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

SN - 0003-4894

IS - 12

ER -