Vouching for the Court? How High Stakes Affect Knowledge and Support of the Supreme Court

Martha H Ginn, Kathleen Searles, Amanda Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Building on the geographic constituency theory of awareness of Supreme Court decisions, we conducted a panel survey in Cleveland, Ohio before and after Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, which upheld state-funded vouchers in religious schools. We found several characteristics predict awareness: news consumption, income, and knowledge of and positive feelings toward the Court. Our results also showed those vested in the outcome, such as African Americans, religious individuals, and parents were more likely to change their attitudes in favor of the decision and become more positive toward the institution. These findings help us understand the circumstances under which some individuals may become vested in court decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)163-179
Number of pages17
JournalJustice System Journal
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

court decision
Supreme Court
attitude change
parents
news
income
school
American

Keywords

  • Legitimacy
  • Media
  • Public opinion
  • Supreme Court

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Cite this

Vouching for the Court? How High Stakes Affect Knowledge and Support of the Supreme Court. / Ginn, Martha H; Searles, Kathleen; Jones, Amanda.

In: Justice System Journal, Vol. 36, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 163-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a96e3b7966784f9b9801c1fb01925978,
title = "Vouching for the Court? How High Stakes Affect Knowledge and Support of the Supreme Court",
abstract = "Building on the geographic constituency theory of awareness of Supreme Court decisions, we conducted a panel survey in Cleveland, Ohio before and after Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, which upheld state-funded vouchers in religious schools. We found several characteristics predict awareness: news consumption, income, and knowledge of and positive feelings toward the Court. Our results also showed those vested in the outcome, such as African Americans, religious individuals, and parents were more likely to change their attitudes in favor of the decision and become more positive toward the institution. These findings help us understand the circumstances under which some individuals may become vested in court decisions.",
keywords = "Legitimacy, Media, Public opinion, Supreme Court",
author = "Ginn, {Martha H} and Kathleen Searles and Amanda Jones",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0098261X.2014.965854",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "163--179",
journal = "Justice System Journal",
issn = "0098-261X",
publisher = "National Center for State Courts",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vouching for the Court? How High Stakes Affect Knowledge and Support of the Supreme Court

AU - Ginn, Martha H

AU - Searles, Kathleen

AU - Jones, Amanda

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Building on the geographic constituency theory of awareness of Supreme Court decisions, we conducted a panel survey in Cleveland, Ohio before and after Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, which upheld state-funded vouchers in religious schools. We found several characteristics predict awareness: news consumption, income, and knowledge of and positive feelings toward the Court. Our results also showed those vested in the outcome, such as African Americans, religious individuals, and parents were more likely to change their attitudes in favor of the decision and become more positive toward the institution. These findings help us understand the circumstances under which some individuals may become vested in court decisions.

AB - Building on the geographic constituency theory of awareness of Supreme Court decisions, we conducted a panel survey in Cleveland, Ohio before and after Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, which upheld state-funded vouchers in religious schools. We found several characteristics predict awareness: news consumption, income, and knowledge of and positive feelings toward the Court. Our results also showed those vested in the outcome, such as African Americans, religious individuals, and parents were more likely to change their attitudes in favor of the decision and become more positive toward the institution. These findings help us understand the circumstances under which some individuals may become vested in court decisions.

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Media

KW - Public opinion

KW - Supreme Court

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956891915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956891915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0098261X.2014.965854

DO - 10.1080/0098261X.2014.965854

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84956891915

VL - 36

SP - 163

EP - 179

JO - Justice System Journal

JF - Justice System Journal

SN - 0098-261X

IS - 2

ER -