We don’t monitor enough

Frank E Block

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The choice of which intraoperative monitors to use for routine cases is difficult, because a multitude of monitors is available today. Monitoring is deemed necessary to avoid problems, although there is little hard evidence that a specific monitor will improve outcome. The risk associated with modern noninvasive monitors, however, is negligible, and they should be considered for routine use in all patients. Although errors in the variables displayed or misuse of correct information can cause difficulties, these result from a lack of education and are not a valid reason to abandon a particular monitoring modality. Regular use of such monitoring tools as the electroencephalogram would allow clinicians to become familiar with how to interpret it in normal and crisis situations. The cost of a disaster during anesthesia (such as unrecognized hypoxia) is high. The dollars spent to cover a single major malpractice award could buy a tremendous number of monitors. The state of the art in the mid-1980s demands traditional anesthesia monitors plus continuous capnography and measurement of peripheral oxygenation. Other negligible-risk monitors should also be used when feasible. Improvement in monitoring design, particularly in output formats and in integration of monitored data, will be essential in the next few years, as will training in the proper use of monitors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)267-269
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Clinical Monitoring
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1986
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anesthesia
Capnography
Malpractice
Disasters
Electroencephalography
Education
Costs and Cost Analysis
Hypoxia

Keywords

  • Complications
  • Equipment
  • Monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

We don’t monitor enough. / Block, Frank E.

In: Journal of Clinical Monitoring, Vol. 2, No. 4, 01.01.1986, p. 267-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Block, Frank E. / We don’t monitor enough. In: Journal of Clinical Monitoring. 1986 ; Vol. 2, No. 4. pp. 267-269.
@article{978ad914fc714d15b89cfcfa6e1717e9,
title = "We don’t monitor enough",
abstract = "The choice of which intraoperative monitors to use for routine cases is difficult, because a multitude of monitors is available today. Monitoring is deemed necessary to avoid problems, although there is little hard evidence that a specific monitor will improve outcome. The risk associated with modern noninvasive monitors, however, is negligible, and they should be considered for routine use in all patients. Although errors in the variables displayed or misuse of correct information can cause difficulties, these result from a lack of education and are not a valid reason to abandon a particular monitoring modality. Regular use of such monitoring tools as the electroencephalogram would allow clinicians to become familiar with how to interpret it in normal and crisis situations. The cost of a disaster during anesthesia (such as unrecognized hypoxia) is high. The dollars spent to cover a single major malpractice award could buy a tremendous number of monitors. The state of the art in the mid-1980s demands traditional anesthesia monitors plus continuous capnography and measurement of peripheral oxygenation. Other negligible-risk monitors should also be used when feasible. Improvement in monitoring design, particularly in output formats and in integration of monitored data, will be essential in the next few years, as will training in the proper use of monitors.",
keywords = "Complications, Equipment, Monitoring",
author = "Block, {Frank E}",
year = "1986",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF02851176",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "267--269",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing",
issn = "1387-1307",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - We don’t monitor enough

AU - Block, Frank E

PY - 1986/1/1

Y1 - 1986/1/1

N2 - The choice of which intraoperative monitors to use for routine cases is difficult, because a multitude of monitors is available today. Monitoring is deemed necessary to avoid problems, although there is little hard evidence that a specific monitor will improve outcome. The risk associated with modern noninvasive monitors, however, is negligible, and they should be considered for routine use in all patients. Although errors in the variables displayed or misuse of correct information can cause difficulties, these result from a lack of education and are not a valid reason to abandon a particular monitoring modality. Regular use of such monitoring tools as the electroencephalogram would allow clinicians to become familiar with how to interpret it in normal and crisis situations. The cost of a disaster during anesthesia (such as unrecognized hypoxia) is high. The dollars spent to cover a single major malpractice award could buy a tremendous number of monitors. The state of the art in the mid-1980s demands traditional anesthesia monitors plus continuous capnography and measurement of peripheral oxygenation. Other negligible-risk monitors should also be used when feasible. Improvement in monitoring design, particularly in output formats and in integration of monitored data, will be essential in the next few years, as will training in the proper use of monitors.

AB - The choice of which intraoperative monitors to use for routine cases is difficult, because a multitude of monitors is available today. Monitoring is deemed necessary to avoid problems, although there is little hard evidence that a specific monitor will improve outcome. The risk associated with modern noninvasive monitors, however, is negligible, and they should be considered for routine use in all patients. Although errors in the variables displayed or misuse of correct information can cause difficulties, these result from a lack of education and are not a valid reason to abandon a particular monitoring modality. Regular use of such monitoring tools as the electroencephalogram would allow clinicians to become familiar with how to interpret it in normal and crisis situations. The cost of a disaster during anesthesia (such as unrecognized hypoxia) is high. The dollars spent to cover a single major malpractice award could buy a tremendous number of monitors. The state of the art in the mid-1980s demands traditional anesthesia monitors plus continuous capnography and measurement of peripheral oxygenation. Other negligible-risk monitors should also be used when feasible. Improvement in monitoring design, particularly in output formats and in integration of monitored data, will be essential in the next few years, as will training in the proper use of monitors.

KW - Complications

KW - Equipment

KW - Monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022499155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022499155&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02851176

DO - 10.1007/BF02851176

M3 - Article

C2 - 3783198

AN - SCOPUS:0022499155

VL - 2

SP - 267

EP - 269

JO - Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

JF - Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

SN - 1387-1307

IS - 4

ER -