Wear resistance of dual-cured resin luting agents.

Kevin B Frazier, D. C. Sarrett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the three-body wear resistance of five commercially available dual-cured resin-based composite luting agents compared both in a dry state and after water storage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six specimens of each material were prepared and tested for three-body wear resistance in the ACTA wear machine for 250,000 cycles and the loss of material was measured with a profilometer. Material wear was measured under three conditions: dry storage, 6-month water storage, and 12-month water storage. RESULTS: One-way and two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test of multiple comparisons revealed significant differences in wear resistance. Water storage did not significantly affect the wear resistance of four of the five materials. The order of wear resistance was: Cosmedent Insure > Vivadent Dual-Cement > Kerr Porcelite Dual Cure > Jeneric/Pentron Optec Luting Cement > Chameleon Mirage FLC (P < or = 0.0001). The rank order of wear resistance could not be readily predicted when based solely on the manufacturers' reported physical specification data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-164
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican journal of dentistry
Volume8
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 1 1995

Fingerprint

Dental Cements
Water
Lizards
Composite Resins
Analysis of Variance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Wear resistance of dual-cured resin luting agents. / Frazier, Kevin B; Sarrett, D. C.

In: American journal of dentistry, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.08.1995, p. 161-164.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dedafb2cffe340608e0610c4c3504d01,
title = "Wear resistance of dual-cured resin luting agents.",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate the three-body wear resistance of five commercially available dual-cured resin-based composite luting agents compared both in a dry state and after water storage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six specimens of each material were prepared and tested for three-body wear resistance in the ACTA wear machine for 250,000 cycles and the loss of material was measured with a profilometer. Material wear was measured under three conditions: dry storage, 6-month water storage, and 12-month water storage. RESULTS: One-way and two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test of multiple comparisons revealed significant differences in wear resistance. Water storage did not significantly affect the wear resistance of four of the five materials. The order of wear resistance was: Cosmedent Insure > Vivadent Dual-Cement > Kerr Porcelite Dual Cure > Jeneric/Pentron Optec Luting Cement > Chameleon Mirage FLC (P < or = 0.0001). The rank order of wear resistance could not be readily predicted when based solely on the manufacturers' reported physical specification data.",
author = "Frazier, {Kevin B} and Sarrett, {D. C.}",
year = "1995",
month = "8",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "161--164",
journal = "American Journal of Dentistry",
issn = "0894-8275",
publisher = "Mosher and Linder, Inc",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wear resistance of dual-cured resin luting agents.

AU - Frazier, Kevin B

AU - Sarrett, D. C.

PY - 1995/8/1

Y1 - 1995/8/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate the three-body wear resistance of five commercially available dual-cured resin-based composite luting agents compared both in a dry state and after water storage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six specimens of each material were prepared and tested for three-body wear resistance in the ACTA wear machine for 250,000 cycles and the loss of material was measured with a profilometer. Material wear was measured under three conditions: dry storage, 6-month water storage, and 12-month water storage. RESULTS: One-way and two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test of multiple comparisons revealed significant differences in wear resistance. Water storage did not significantly affect the wear resistance of four of the five materials. The order of wear resistance was: Cosmedent Insure > Vivadent Dual-Cement > Kerr Porcelite Dual Cure > Jeneric/Pentron Optec Luting Cement > Chameleon Mirage FLC (P < or = 0.0001). The rank order of wear resistance could not be readily predicted when based solely on the manufacturers' reported physical specification data.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate the three-body wear resistance of five commercially available dual-cured resin-based composite luting agents compared both in a dry state and after water storage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six specimens of each material were prepared and tested for three-body wear resistance in the ACTA wear machine for 250,000 cycles and the loss of material was measured with a profilometer. Material wear was measured under three conditions: dry storage, 6-month water storage, and 12-month water storage. RESULTS: One-way and two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test of multiple comparisons revealed significant differences in wear resistance. Water storage did not significantly affect the wear resistance of four of the five materials. The order of wear resistance was: Cosmedent Insure > Vivadent Dual-Cement > Kerr Porcelite Dual Cure > Jeneric/Pentron Optec Luting Cement > Chameleon Mirage FLC (P < or = 0.0001). The rank order of wear resistance could not be readily predicted when based solely on the manufacturers' reported physical specification data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029351254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029351254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7576379

AN - SCOPUS:0029351254

VL - 8

SP - 161

EP - 164

JO - American Journal of Dentistry

JF - American Journal of Dentistry

SN - 0894-8275

IS - 4

ER -