Women's responses to cervical interrogation by fluorescent and reflective spectroscopy

Daron Gale Ferris, Mark S. Litaker, Eileen D. Dickman, Lynn M. Allmond, Kelly M. Smith, Terry L. Arrington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To determine women's responses to cervical interrogation by fluorescent and reflective spectroscopy (FRS). Materials and methods. A convenience sample of women scheduled for a colposcopic examination was interrogated by a cervical FRS system. Thereafter, women completed a 24-item questionnaire that assessed their responses to the spectroscopic test. Likert-scale responses were compared among subgroups using the Χ2 test for trend. Results. Most women favored FRS used for locating (97.7%; 170/174) and selectively sampling (96.6%; 168/174) cervical neoplasia. Fewer women (81.0%; 141/174) wanted FRS to replace the Pap smear. Most women were neither nervous (73.6%; 128/174) nor bothered (89.1%; 155/174) by the extra time for the FRS assessment. Women's acceptance was substantiated by 84.9% (146/174) and 90.8% (157/173) wanting their doctor to have and insurance company to pay for FRS, respectively. Conclusions. Use of FRS as a colposcopic adjunct was supported very favorably by women. Fewer women supported FRS replacing Pap smears. These high rates of approval by women should help the implementation of FRS technology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)299-303
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Lower Genital Tract Disease
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2003

Fingerprint

Spectrum Analysis
Papanicolaou Test
Insurance
Technology
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Cancer diagnosis
  • Cervical neoplasia
  • Fluorescent and reflective spectroscopy
  • Patient preferences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Women's responses to cervical interrogation by fluorescent and reflective spectroscopy. / Ferris, Daron Gale; Litaker, Mark S.; Dickman, Eileen D.; Allmond, Lynn M.; Smith, Kelly M.; Arrington, Terry L.

In: Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, Vol. 7, No. 4, 01.10.2003, p. 299-303.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ferris, Daron Gale ; Litaker, Mark S. ; Dickman, Eileen D. ; Allmond, Lynn M. ; Smith, Kelly M. ; Arrington, Terry L. / Women's responses to cervical interrogation by fluorescent and reflective spectroscopy. In: Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 2003 ; Vol. 7, No. 4. pp. 299-303.
@article{e2ced6cf2b3549c9a158b87834433dc3,
title = "Women's responses to cervical interrogation by fluorescent and reflective spectroscopy",
abstract = "Objective. To determine women's responses to cervical interrogation by fluorescent and reflective spectroscopy (FRS). Materials and methods. A convenience sample of women scheduled for a colposcopic examination was interrogated by a cervical FRS system. Thereafter, women completed a 24-item questionnaire that assessed their responses to the spectroscopic test. Likert-scale responses were compared among subgroups using the Χ2 test for trend. Results. Most women favored FRS used for locating (97.7{\%}; 170/174) and selectively sampling (96.6{\%}; 168/174) cervical neoplasia. Fewer women (81.0{\%}; 141/174) wanted FRS to replace the Pap smear. Most women were neither nervous (73.6{\%}; 128/174) nor bothered (89.1{\%}; 155/174) by the extra time for the FRS assessment. Women's acceptance was substantiated by 84.9{\%} (146/174) and 90.8{\%} (157/173) wanting their doctor to have and insurance company to pay for FRS, respectively. Conclusions. Use of FRS as a colposcopic adjunct was supported very favorably by women. Fewer women supported FRS replacing Pap smears. These high rates of approval by women should help the implementation of FRS technology.",
keywords = "Cancer diagnosis, Cervical neoplasia, Fluorescent and reflective spectroscopy, Patient preferences",
author = "Ferris, {Daron Gale} and Litaker, {Mark S.} and Dickman, {Eileen D.} and Allmond, {Lynn M.} and Smith, {Kelly M.} and Arrington, {Terry L.}",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00128360-200310000-00013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "299--303",
journal = "Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease",
issn = "1089-2591",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Women's responses to cervical interrogation by fluorescent and reflective spectroscopy

AU - Ferris, Daron Gale

AU - Litaker, Mark S.

AU - Dickman, Eileen D.

AU - Allmond, Lynn M.

AU - Smith, Kelly M.

AU - Arrington, Terry L.

PY - 2003/10/1

Y1 - 2003/10/1

N2 - Objective. To determine women's responses to cervical interrogation by fluorescent and reflective spectroscopy (FRS). Materials and methods. A convenience sample of women scheduled for a colposcopic examination was interrogated by a cervical FRS system. Thereafter, women completed a 24-item questionnaire that assessed their responses to the spectroscopic test. Likert-scale responses were compared among subgroups using the Χ2 test for trend. Results. Most women favored FRS used for locating (97.7%; 170/174) and selectively sampling (96.6%; 168/174) cervical neoplasia. Fewer women (81.0%; 141/174) wanted FRS to replace the Pap smear. Most women were neither nervous (73.6%; 128/174) nor bothered (89.1%; 155/174) by the extra time for the FRS assessment. Women's acceptance was substantiated by 84.9% (146/174) and 90.8% (157/173) wanting their doctor to have and insurance company to pay for FRS, respectively. Conclusions. Use of FRS as a colposcopic adjunct was supported very favorably by women. Fewer women supported FRS replacing Pap smears. These high rates of approval by women should help the implementation of FRS technology.

AB - Objective. To determine women's responses to cervical interrogation by fluorescent and reflective spectroscopy (FRS). Materials and methods. A convenience sample of women scheduled for a colposcopic examination was interrogated by a cervical FRS system. Thereafter, women completed a 24-item questionnaire that assessed their responses to the spectroscopic test. Likert-scale responses were compared among subgroups using the Χ2 test for trend. Results. Most women favored FRS used for locating (97.7%; 170/174) and selectively sampling (96.6%; 168/174) cervical neoplasia. Fewer women (81.0%; 141/174) wanted FRS to replace the Pap smear. Most women were neither nervous (73.6%; 128/174) nor bothered (89.1%; 155/174) by the extra time for the FRS assessment. Women's acceptance was substantiated by 84.9% (146/174) and 90.8% (157/173) wanting their doctor to have and insurance company to pay for FRS, respectively. Conclusions. Use of FRS as a colposcopic adjunct was supported very favorably by women. Fewer women supported FRS replacing Pap smears. These high rates of approval by women should help the implementation of FRS technology.

KW - Cancer diagnosis

KW - Cervical neoplasia

KW - Fluorescent and reflective spectroscopy

KW - Patient preferences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242351961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242351961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00128360-200310000-00013

DO - 10.1097/00128360-200310000-00013

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 299

EP - 303

JO - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

JF - Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease

SN - 1089-2591

IS - 4

ER -