A century of debate for internal controls and their assessment

A study of reactive evolution

Jan R. Heier, Michael Timothy Dugan, David L. Sayers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In July 2002, the United States Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in an effort to assuage the public outrage over the lax regulatory oversight in light of the high-profile financial scandals. It was hoped that the act would calm the fears of investors and bring confidence back to corporate reporting through a mandated internal control review process. Though the impact of the act on audit procedures and internal control development will be studied for many years, it may be simply one of many developments in the evolution of internal control theory and practice that had occurred over the previous century. Like Sarbanes- Oxley, many of the changes in internal control procedures were a reaction to an event that identified a weakness in current practice. This evolution of the internal control process, as seen through the many laws, regulations and pronouncements of the previous century, has been, in the main, a reactive one resulting from inadequate control measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-70
Number of pages32
JournalAccounting History
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2005

Fingerprint

Internal control
Audit
Outrage
Control Theory
Scandal
Confidence
Investors
Corporate reporting
Oversight
Sarbanes-Oxley
Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Review process
Control theory

Keywords

  • Accounting controls
  • Accounting irregularities
  • Administrative controls
  • Audit integrity
  • Control environment
  • Control procedures
  • Control risk
  • Errors and irregularities
  • Fraud
  • Internal control
  • SAS No.55
  • SAS No.78
  • SAS No.82
  • Sarbanes-Oxley

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • History

Cite this

A century of debate for internal controls and their assessment : A study of reactive evolution. / Heier, Jan R.; Dugan, Michael Timothy; Sayers, David L.

In: Accounting History, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.11.2005, p. 39-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e6a7ffd72f604955a4ced6cd21a0ff30,
title = "A century of debate for internal controls and their assessment: A study of reactive evolution",
abstract = "In July 2002, the United States Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in an effort to assuage the public outrage over the lax regulatory oversight in light of the high-profile financial scandals. It was hoped that the act would calm the fears of investors and bring confidence back to corporate reporting through a mandated internal control review process. Though the impact of the act on audit procedures and internal control development will be studied for many years, it may be simply one of many developments in the evolution of internal control theory and practice that had occurred over the previous century. Like Sarbanes- Oxley, many of the changes in internal control procedures were a reaction to an event that identified a weakness in current practice. This evolution of the internal control process, as seen through the many laws, regulations and pronouncements of the previous century, has been, in the main, a reactive one resulting from inadequate control measures.",
keywords = "Accounting controls, Accounting irregularities, Administrative controls, Audit integrity, Control environment, Control procedures, Control risk, Errors and irregularities, Fraud, Internal control, SAS No.55, SAS No.78, SAS No.82, Sarbanes-Oxley",
author = "Heier, {Jan R.} and Dugan, {Michael Timothy} and Sayers, {David L.}",
year = "2005",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/103237320501000303",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "39--70",
journal = "Accounting History",
issn = "1032-3732",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A century of debate for internal controls and their assessment

T2 - A study of reactive evolution

AU - Heier, Jan R.

AU - Dugan, Michael Timothy

AU - Sayers, David L.

PY - 2005/11/1

Y1 - 2005/11/1

N2 - In July 2002, the United States Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in an effort to assuage the public outrage over the lax regulatory oversight in light of the high-profile financial scandals. It was hoped that the act would calm the fears of investors and bring confidence back to corporate reporting through a mandated internal control review process. Though the impact of the act on audit procedures and internal control development will be studied for many years, it may be simply one of many developments in the evolution of internal control theory and practice that had occurred over the previous century. Like Sarbanes- Oxley, many of the changes in internal control procedures were a reaction to an event that identified a weakness in current practice. This evolution of the internal control process, as seen through the many laws, regulations and pronouncements of the previous century, has been, in the main, a reactive one resulting from inadequate control measures.

AB - In July 2002, the United States Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in an effort to assuage the public outrage over the lax regulatory oversight in light of the high-profile financial scandals. It was hoped that the act would calm the fears of investors and bring confidence back to corporate reporting through a mandated internal control review process. Though the impact of the act on audit procedures and internal control development will be studied for many years, it may be simply one of many developments in the evolution of internal control theory and practice that had occurred over the previous century. Like Sarbanes- Oxley, many of the changes in internal control procedures were a reaction to an event that identified a weakness in current practice. This evolution of the internal control process, as seen through the many laws, regulations and pronouncements of the previous century, has been, in the main, a reactive one resulting from inadequate control measures.

KW - Accounting controls

KW - Accounting irregularities

KW - Administrative controls

KW - Audit integrity

KW - Control environment

KW - Control procedures

KW - Control risk

KW - Errors and irregularities

KW - Fraud

KW - Internal control

KW - SAS No.55

KW - SAS No.78

KW - SAS No.82

KW - Sarbanes-Oxley

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052836832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052836832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/103237320501000303

DO - 10.1177/103237320501000303

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 39

EP - 70

JO - Accounting History

JF - Accounting History

SN - 1032-3732

IS - 3

ER -