A comparative study of shape representation in macaque visual areas V2 and V4

Jay Hegde, David C. Van Essen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

106 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared aspects of shape representation in extrastriate visual areas V2 and V4, which are both implicated in shape processing and belong to different hierarchical levels. We recorded responses of cells in awake, fixating monkeys to matched sets of contour and grating stimuli of low or intermediate complexity. These included simple stimuli (bars and sinusoids) and more complex stimuli (angles, intersections, arcs, and non-Cartesian gratings), all scaled to receptive field size. The responses of cells within each area were substantially modulated by each shape characteristic tested, with substantial overlap between areas by many response measures. Our analyses revealed many clear and reliable differences between areas in terms of the effectiveness of, and response modulation by, various shape characteristics. Grating stimuli were on average more effective than contour stimuli in V2 and V4, but the difference was more pronounced in V4. As a population, V4 showed greater response modulation by some shape characteristics (including simple shape characteristics) and V2 showed greater response modulation by many others (including complex shape characteristics). Recordings from area V1 demonstrated complex shape selectivity in some cells and relatively modest population differences in comparison with V2. Altogether, the representation of 2-dimensional shape characteristics revealed by this analysis varies substantially among the 3 areas. But surprisingly, the differences revealed by our analyses, individually or collectively, do not parallel the stepwise organization of the anatomical hierarchy. Commonalities of visual shape representation across hierarchical levels may reflect the replication of neural circuits used in generating complex shape representations at multiple spatial scales.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1100-1116
Number of pages17
JournalCerebral Cortex
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Macaca
Population
Haplorhini

Keywords

  • Contours
  • Extrastriate cortex
  • Hierarchical processing
  • Non-Cartesian gratings
  • Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

A comparative study of shape representation in macaque visual areas V2 and V4. / Hegde, Jay; Van Essen, David C.

In: Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 17, No. 5, 01.05.2007, p. 1100-1116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hegde, Jay ; Van Essen, David C. / A comparative study of shape representation in macaque visual areas V2 and V4. In: Cerebral Cortex. 2007 ; Vol. 17, No. 5. pp. 1100-1116.
@article{b0bcb2f6fea446cd8b1ed6145442b288,
title = "A comparative study of shape representation in macaque visual areas V2 and V4",
abstract = "We compared aspects of shape representation in extrastriate visual areas V2 and V4, which are both implicated in shape processing and belong to different hierarchical levels. We recorded responses of cells in awake, fixating monkeys to matched sets of contour and grating stimuli of low or intermediate complexity. These included simple stimuli (bars and sinusoids) and more complex stimuli (angles, intersections, arcs, and non-Cartesian gratings), all scaled to receptive field size. The responses of cells within each area were substantially modulated by each shape characteristic tested, with substantial overlap between areas by many response measures. Our analyses revealed many clear and reliable differences between areas in terms of the effectiveness of, and response modulation by, various shape characteristics. Grating stimuli were on average more effective than contour stimuli in V2 and V4, but the difference was more pronounced in V4. As a population, V4 showed greater response modulation by some shape characteristics (including simple shape characteristics) and V2 showed greater response modulation by many others (including complex shape characteristics). Recordings from area V1 demonstrated complex shape selectivity in some cells and relatively modest population differences in comparison with V2. Altogether, the representation of 2-dimensional shape characteristics revealed by this analysis varies substantially among the 3 areas. But surprisingly, the differences revealed by our analyses, individually or collectively, do not parallel the stepwise organization of the anatomical hierarchy. Commonalities of visual shape representation across hierarchical levels may reflect the replication of neural circuits used in generating complex shape representations at multiple spatial scales.",
keywords = "Contours, Extrastriate cortex, Hierarchical processing, Non-Cartesian gratings, Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis",
author = "Jay Hegde and {Van Essen}, {David C.}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/cercor/bhl020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "1100--1116",
journal = "Cerebral Cortex",
issn = "1047-3211",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of shape representation in macaque visual areas V2 and V4

AU - Hegde, Jay

AU - Van Essen, David C.

PY - 2007/5/1

Y1 - 2007/5/1

N2 - We compared aspects of shape representation in extrastriate visual areas V2 and V4, which are both implicated in shape processing and belong to different hierarchical levels. We recorded responses of cells in awake, fixating monkeys to matched sets of contour and grating stimuli of low or intermediate complexity. These included simple stimuli (bars and sinusoids) and more complex stimuli (angles, intersections, arcs, and non-Cartesian gratings), all scaled to receptive field size. The responses of cells within each area were substantially modulated by each shape characteristic tested, with substantial overlap between areas by many response measures. Our analyses revealed many clear and reliable differences between areas in terms of the effectiveness of, and response modulation by, various shape characteristics. Grating stimuli were on average more effective than contour stimuli in V2 and V4, but the difference was more pronounced in V4. As a population, V4 showed greater response modulation by some shape characteristics (including simple shape characteristics) and V2 showed greater response modulation by many others (including complex shape characteristics). Recordings from area V1 demonstrated complex shape selectivity in some cells and relatively modest population differences in comparison with V2. Altogether, the representation of 2-dimensional shape characteristics revealed by this analysis varies substantially among the 3 areas. But surprisingly, the differences revealed by our analyses, individually or collectively, do not parallel the stepwise organization of the anatomical hierarchy. Commonalities of visual shape representation across hierarchical levels may reflect the replication of neural circuits used in generating complex shape representations at multiple spatial scales.

AB - We compared aspects of shape representation in extrastriate visual areas V2 and V4, which are both implicated in shape processing and belong to different hierarchical levels. We recorded responses of cells in awake, fixating monkeys to matched sets of contour and grating stimuli of low or intermediate complexity. These included simple stimuli (bars and sinusoids) and more complex stimuli (angles, intersections, arcs, and non-Cartesian gratings), all scaled to receptive field size. The responses of cells within each area were substantially modulated by each shape characteristic tested, with substantial overlap between areas by many response measures. Our analyses revealed many clear and reliable differences between areas in terms of the effectiveness of, and response modulation by, various shape characteristics. Grating stimuli were on average more effective than contour stimuli in V2 and V4, but the difference was more pronounced in V4. As a population, V4 showed greater response modulation by some shape characteristics (including simple shape characteristics) and V2 showed greater response modulation by many others (including complex shape characteristics). Recordings from area V1 demonstrated complex shape selectivity in some cells and relatively modest population differences in comparison with V2. Altogether, the representation of 2-dimensional shape characteristics revealed by this analysis varies substantially among the 3 areas. But surprisingly, the differences revealed by our analyses, individually or collectively, do not parallel the stepwise organization of the anatomical hierarchy. Commonalities of visual shape representation across hierarchical levels may reflect the replication of neural circuits used in generating complex shape representations at multiple spatial scales.

KW - Contours

KW - Extrastriate cortex

KW - Hierarchical processing

KW - Non-Cartesian gratings

KW - Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247111185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247111185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/cercor/bhl020

DO - 10.1093/cercor/bhl020

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 1100

EP - 1116

JO - Cerebral Cortex

JF - Cerebral Cortex

SN - 1047-3211

IS - 5

ER -