A Comparison between In Vivo Radiographic Working Length Determination and Measurement after Extraction

Clayton B. Williams, Anthony P. Joyce, Steven Roberts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the difference between the in vivo working length established by viewing a periapical radiograph and the in vitro measurement from the file tip to the apical foramen of the extracted tooth. Twenty-six canals from teeth that had been treatment planned for extraction were accessed under rubber dam isolation. The coronal portion of each canal was flared using Gates Glidden drills, and a K-type file was inserted down the canal until an electronic apex locator indicated that the file had reached the apex. A size 20 K-type file was locked into place with glass ionomer cement at this position. A radiograph was exposed and the tooth was extracted. Each tooth was viewed using a videomicroscope at 30× original magnification, and the distance from the file tip to the most coronal aspect of the major foramen was measured. Six examiners viewed each radiograph and assessed the working length of each canal. χ2 analysis of the data revealed a significant difference (p < 0.01) between the estimation of working lengths and the microscopic measurements. The examiners overestimated the distance between the file tip and the apical foramen of the tooth when the file was placed short, and underestimated the distance when the file was placed long. In conclusion, when the file is short it is actually closer to the apical foramen than it appears radiographically; when it is long it is actually longer than it appears radiographically.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)624-627
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume32
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2006

Fingerprint

Tooth Apex
Tooth
Rubber Dams
Glass Ionomer Cements
Mandrillus

Keywords

  • Electronic apex locator
  • major foramen
  • minor diameter
  • radiographic working length
  • working length
  • working length determination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

A Comparison between In Vivo Radiographic Working Length Determination and Measurement after Extraction. / Williams, Clayton B.; Joyce, Anthony P.; Roberts, Steven.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 32, No. 7, 01.07.2006, p. 624-627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Williams, Clayton B. ; Joyce, Anthony P. ; Roberts, Steven. / A Comparison between In Vivo Radiographic Working Length Determination and Measurement after Extraction. In: Journal of Endodontics. 2006 ; Vol. 32, No. 7. pp. 624-627.
@article{e3da54308bb04bf7ad0336d5675ce906,
title = "A Comparison between In Vivo Radiographic Working Length Determination and Measurement after Extraction",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare the difference between the in vivo working length established by viewing a periapical radiograph and the in vitro measurement from the file tip to the apical foramen of the extracted tooth. Twenty-six canals from teeth that had been treatment planned for extraction were accessed under rubber dam isolation. The coronal portion of each canal was flared using Gates Glidden drills, and a K-type file was inserted down the canal until an electronic apex locator indicated that the file had reached the apex. A size 20 K-type file was locked into place with glass ionomer cement at this position. A radiograph was exposed and the tooth was extracted. Each tooth was viewed using a videomicroscope at 30× original magnification, and the distance from the file tip to the most coronal aspect of the major foramen was measured. Six examiners viewed each radiograph and assessed the working length of each canal. χ2 analysis of the data revealed a significant difference (p < 0.01) between the estimation of working lengths and the microscopic measurements. The examiners overestimated the distance between the file tip and the apical foramen of the tooth when the file was placed short, and underestimated the distance when the file was placed long. In conclusion, when the file is short it is actually closer to the apical foramen than it appears radiographically; when it is long it is actually longer than it appears radiographically.",
keywords = "Electronic apex locator, major foramen, minor diameter, radiographic working length, working length, working length determination",
author = "Williams, {Clayton B.} and Joyce, {Anthony P.} and Steven Roberts",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "624--627",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison between In Vivo Radiographic Working Length Determination and Measurement after Extraction

AU - Williams, Clayton B.

AU - Joyce, Anthony P.

AU - Roberts, Steven

PY - 2006/7/1

Y1 - 2006/7/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the difference between the in vivo working length established by viewing a periapical radiograph and the in vitro measurement from the file tip to the apical foramen of the extracted tooth. Twenty-six canals from teeth that had been treatment planned for extraction were accessed under rubber dam isolation. The coronal portion of each canal was flared using Gates Glidden drills, and a K-type file was inserted down the canal until an electronic apex locator indicated that the file had reached the apex. A size 20 K-type file was locked into place with glass ionomer cement at this position. A radiograph was exposed and the tooth was extracted. Each tooth was viewed using a videomicroscope at 30× original magnification, and the distance from the file tip to the most coronal aspect of the major foramen was measured. Six examiners viewed each radiograph and assessed the working length of each canal. χ2 analysis of the data revealed a significant difference (p < 0.01) between the estimation of working lengths and the microscopic measurements. The examiners overestimated the distance between the file tip and the apical foramen of the tooth when the file was placed short, and underestimated the distance when the file was placed long. In conclusion, when the file is short it is actually closer to the apical foramen than it appears radiographically; when it is long it is actually longer than it appears radiographically.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the difference between the in vivo working length established by viewing a periapical radiograph and the in vitro measurement from the file tip to the apical foramen of the extracted tooth. Twenty-six canals from teeth that had been treatment planned for extraction were accessed under rubber dam isolation. The coronal portion of each canal was flared using Gates Glidden drills, and a K-type file was inserted down the canal until an electronic apex locator indicated that the file had reached the apex. A size 20 K-type file was locked into place with glass ionomer cement at this position. A radiograph was exposed and the tooth was extracted. Each tooth was viewed using a videomicroscope at 30× original magnification, and the distance from the file tip to the most coronal aspect of the major foramen was measured. Six examiners viewed each radiograph and assessed the working length of each canal. χ2 analysis of the data revealed a significant difference (p < 0.01) between the estimation of working lengths and the microscopic measurements. The examiners overestimated the distance between the file tip and the apical foramen of the tooth when the file was placed short, and underestimated the distance when the file was placed long. In conclusion, when the file is short it is actually closer to the apical foramen than it appears radiographically; when it is long it is actually longer than it appears radiographically.

KW - Electronic apex locator

KW - major foramen

KW - minor diameter

KW - radiographic working length

KW - working length

KW - working length determination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745204176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745204176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.044

DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.044

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 624

EP - 627

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 7

ER -