A Comparison of Cohesive Strength and Stiffness of Resilon and Gutta-Percha

Chad Williams, Robert J. Loushine, R. Norman Weller, David H. Pashley, Franklin R. Tay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha under dry conditions and after 1 month of water storage to determine if they are stiff enough to reinforce roots. Dog-bone shaped specimens were created and pulled to failure at 3 mm/min in a Vitrodyne universal tester. The apparent modulus of elasticity, percent elongation, and yield stress were measured. Cohesive strength was defined as the yield stress. The data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA for each outcome (α = 0.05). The results of this study show that the cohesive strength (that is the tensile stress when they begin to flow or break) and modulus of elasticity (or stiffness) of gutta-percha and Resilon are relatively low. Although the results showed statistically significant differences between the physical properties of gutta-percha and Resilon under varied conditions, these differences were not clinically significant. In conclusion, the stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha is too low to reinforce roots after root canal therapy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)553-555
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2006

Fingerprint

Gutta-Percha
Elastic Modulus
Root Canal Therapy
Tensile Strength
Analysis of Variance
Dogs
Bone and Bones
Water

Keywords

  • Cohesive strength
  • Epiphany
  • Resilon
  • modulus of elasticity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

A Comparison of Cohesive Strength and Stiffness of Resilon and Gutta-Percha. / Williams, Chad; Loushine, Robert J.; Weller, R. Norman; Pashley, David H.; Tay, Franklin R.

In: Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 32, No. 6, 01.06.2006, p. 553-555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Williams, Chad ; Loushine, Robert J. ; Weller, R. Norman ; Pashley, David H. ; Tay, Franklin R. / A Comparison of Cohesive Strength and Stiffness of Resilon and Gutta-Percha. In: Journal of Endodontics. 2006 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 553-555.
@article{858a5532d9324f3fb44c07c8c35f620f,
title = "A Comparison of Cohesive Strength and Stiffness of Resilon and Gutta-Percha",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare the cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha under dry conditions and after 1 month of water storage to determine if they are stiff enough to reinforce roots. Dog-bone shaped specimens were created and pulled to failure at 3 mm/min in a Vitrodyne universal tester. The apparent modulus of elasticity, percent elongation, and yield stress were measured. Cohesive strength was defined as the yield stress. The data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA for each outcome (α = 0.05). The results of this study show that the cohesive strength (that is the tensile stress when they begin to flow or break) and modulus of elasticity (or stiffness) of gutta-percha and Resilon are relatively low. Although the results showed statistically significant differences between the physical properties of gutta-percha and Resilon under varied conditions, these differences were not clinically significant. In conclusion, the stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha is too low to reinforce roots after root canal therapy.",
keywords = "Cohesive strength, Epiphany, Resilon, modulus of elasticity",
author = "Chad Williams and Loushine, {Robert J.} and Weller, {R. Norman} and Pashley, {David H.} and Tay, {Franklin R.}",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "553--555",
journal = "Journal of Endodontics",
issn = "0099-2399",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Cohesive Strength and Stiffness of Resilon and Gutta-Percha

AU - Williams, Chad

AU - Loushine, Robert J.

AU - Weller, R. Norman

AU - Pashley, David H.

AU - Tay, Franklin R.

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha under dry conditions and after 1 month of water storage to determine if they are stiff enough to reinforce roots. Dog-bone shaped specimens were created and pulled to failure at 3 mm/min in a Vitrodyne universal tester. The apparent modulus of elasticity, percent elongation, and yield stress were measured. Cohesive strength was defined as the yield stress. The data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA for each outcome (α = 0.05). The results of this study show that the cohesive strength (that is the tensile stress when they begin to flow or break) and modulus of elasticity (or stiffness) of gutta-percha and Resilon are relatively low. Although the results showed statistically significant differences between the physical properties of gutta-percha and Resilon under varied conditions, these differences were not clinically significant. In conclusion, the stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha is too low to reinforce roots after root canal therapy.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the cohesive strength and stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha under dry conditions and after 1 month of water storage to determine if they are stiff enough to reinforce roots. Dog-bone shaped specimens were created and pulled to failure at 3 mm/min in a Vitrodyne universal tester. The apparent modulus of elasticity, percent elongation, and yield stress were measured. Cohesive strength was defined as the yield stress. The data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA for each outcome (α = 0.05). The results of this study show that the cohesive strength (that is the tensile stress when they begin to flow or break) and modulus of elasticity (or stiffness) of gutta-percha and Resilon are relatively low. Although the results showed statistically significant differences between the physical properties of gutta-percha and Resilon under varied conditions, these differences were not clinically significant. In conclusion, the stiffness of Resilon and gutta-percha is too low to reinforce roots after root canal therapy.

KW - Cohesive strength

KW - Epiphany

KW - Resilon

KW - modulus of elasticity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646683584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646683584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 16728249

AN - SCOPUS:33646683584

VL - 32

SP - 553

EP - 555

JO - Journal of Endodontics

JF - Journal of Endodontics

SN - 0099-2399

IS - 6

ER -