A Comparison of the Ability of Two Upper Extremity Assessments to Measure Change in Function

Leigh Ann Lehman, Bhagwant S. Sindhu, Orit Shechtman, Sergio Romero, Craig A. Velozo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective Measurement Comparison. Introduction: Upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders affect millions, thus, discerning optimal assessments for measuring change in upper extremity function is critical. Purpose of the Study: To compare responsiveness (ability to measure change) of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI). Methods: Statistical analyses included Rasch analysis to place the instruments on the same scale, analysis of variance to compare change scores, correlations to compare change scores with global ratings, and the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine meaningful change scores and overall error. Results: Change scores on the DASH and UEFI and correlations between change scores and global ratings were similar. Areas under the ROC curves for the DASH and UEFI were 67% and 65%, respectively. Conclusions: Neither assessment has a clear advantage over the other when measuring clinical change. Level of Evidence: Not applicable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-40
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Hand Therapy
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Upper Extremity
Arm
Hand
ROC Curve
Analysis of Variance
Retrospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

A Comparison of the Ability of Two Upper Extremity Assessments to Measure Change in Function. / Lehman, Leigh Ann; Sindhu, Bhagwant S.; Shechtman, Orit; Romero, Sergio; Velozo, Craig A.

In: Journal of Hand Therapy, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 31-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lehman, Leigh Ann ; Sindhu, Bhagwant S. ; Shechtman, Orit ; Romero, Sergio ; Velozo, Craig A. / A Comparison of the Ability of Two Upper Extremity Assessments to Measure Change in Function. In: Journal of Hand Therapy. 2010 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 31-40.
@article{edcbcdb0839c47358c1fc2f1a729b839,
title = "A Comparison of the Ability of Two Upper Extremity Assessments to Measure Change in Function",
abstract = "Study Design: Retrospective Measurement Comparison. Introduction: Upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders affect millions, thus, discerning optimal assessments for measuring change in upper extremity function is critical. Purpose of the Study: To compare responsiveness (ability to measure change) of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI). Methods: Statistical analyses included Rasch analysis to place the instruments on the same scale, analysis of variance to compare change scores, correlations to compare change scores with global ratings, and the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine meaningful change scores and overall error. Results: Change scores on the DASH and UEFI and correlations between change scores and global ratings were similar. Areas under the ROC curves for the DASH and UEFI were 67{\%} and 65{\%}, respectively. Conclusions: Neither assessment has a clear advantage over the other when measuring clinical change. Level of Evidence: Not applicable.",
author = "Lehman, {Leigh Ann} and Sindhu, {Bhagwant S.} and Orit Shechtman and Sergio Romero and Velozo, {Craig A.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jht.2009.09.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "31--40",
journal = "Journal of Hand Therapy",
issn = "0894-1130",
publisher = "Hanley and Belfus Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of the Ability of Two Upper Extremity Assessments to Measure Change in Function

AU - Lehman, Leigh Ann

AU - Sindhu, Bhagwant S.

AU - Shechtman, Orit

AU - Romero, Sergio

AU - Velozo, Craig A.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Study Design: Retrospective Measurement Comparison. Introduction: Upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders affect millions, thus, discerning optimal assessments for measuring change in upper extremity function is critical. Purpose of the Study: To compare responsiveness (ability to measure change) of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI). Methods: Statistical analyses included Rasch analysis to place the instruments on the same scale, analysis of variance to compare change scores, correlations to compare change scores with global ratings, and the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine meaningful change scores and overall error. Results: Change scores on the DASH and UEFI and correlations between change scores and global ratings were similar. Areas under the ROC curves for the DASH and UEFI were 67% and 65%, respectively. Conclusions: Neither assessment has a clear advantage over the other when measuring clinical change. Level of Evidence: Not applicable.

AB - Study Design: Retrospective Measurement Comparison. Introduction: Upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders affect millions, thus, discerning optimal assessments for measuring change in upper extremity function is critical. Purpose of the Study: To compare responsiveness (ability to measure change) of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI). Methods: Statistical analyses included Rasch analysis to place the instruments on the same scale, analysis of variance to compare change scores, correlations to compare change scores with global ratings, and the use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine meaningful change scores and overall error. Results: Change scores on the DASH and UEFI and correlations between change scores and global ratings were similar. Areas under the ROC curves for the DASH and UEFI were 67% and 65%, respectively. Conclusions: Neither assessment has a clear advantage over the other when measuring clinical change. Level of Evidence: Not applicable.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75349090725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75349090725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jht.2009.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jht.2009.09.006

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 31

EP - 40

JO - Journal of Hand Therapy

JF - Journal of Hand Therapy

SN - 0894-1130

IS - 1

ER -