A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II: The meta-analyses

Per Olofsson, Diogo Ayres-De-Campos, Jörg Kessler, Britta Tendal, Branka M. Yli, Lawrence Devoe

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

We appraised the methodology, execution and quality of the five published meta-analyses that are based on the five randomized controlled trials which compared cardiotocography (CTG)+ST analysis to cardiotocography. The meta-analyses contained errors, either created de novo in handling of original data or from a failure to recognize essential differences among the randomized controlled trials, particularly in their inclusion criteria and outcome parameters. No meta-analysis contained complete and relevant data from all five randomized controlled trials. We believe that one randomized controlled trial excluded in two of the meta-analyses should have been included, whereas one randomized controlled trial that was included in all meta-analyses, should have been excluded. After correction of the uncovered errors and exclusion of the randomized controlled trial that we deemed inappropriate, our new meta-analysis showed that CTG+ST monitoring significantly reduces the fetal scalp blood sampling usage (risk ratio 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.88), total operative delivery rate (0.93; 0.88-0.99) and metabolic acidosis rate (0.61; 0.41-0.91).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)571-586
Number of pages16
JournalActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Volume93
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2014

Keywords

  • Cardiotocography
  • ST analysis
  • fetal surveillance
  • meta-analysis
  • metabolic acidosis
  • randomized controlled trial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II: The meta-analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this