A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II: The meta-analyses

Per Olofsson, Diogo Ayres-De-Campos, Jörg Kessler, Britta Tendal, Branka M. Yli, Lawrence Devoe

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We appraised the methodology, execution and quality of the five published meta-analyses that are based on the five randomized controlled trials which compared cardiotocography (CTG)+ST analysis to cardiotocography. The meta-analyses contained errors, either created de novo in handling of original data or from a failure to recognize essential differences among the randomized controlled trials, particularly in their inclusion criteria and outcome parameters. No meta-analysis contained complete and relevant data from all five randomized controlled trials. We believe that one randomized controlled trial excluded in two of the meta-analyses should have been included, whereas one randomized controlled trial that was included in all meta-analyses, should have been excluded. After correction of the uncovered errors and exclusion of the randomized controlled trial that we deemed inappropriate, our new meta-analysis showed that CTG+ST monitoring significantly reduces the fetal scalp blood sampling usage (risk ratio 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.88), total operative delivery rate (0.93; 0.88-0.99) and metabolic acidosis rate (0.61; 0.41-0.91).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)571-586
Number of pages16
JournalActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Volume93
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2014

Fingerprint

Cardiotocography
Meta-Analysis
Electrocardiography
Randomized Controlled Trials
Acidosis
Scalp
Fetal Blood
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals

Keywords

  • Cardiotocography
  • ST analysis
  • fetal surveillance
  • meta-analysis
  • metabolic acidosis
  • randomized controlled trial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II : The meta-analyses. / Olofsson, Per; Ayres-De-Campos, Diogo; Kessler, Jörg; Tendal, Britta; Yli, Branka M.; Devoe, Lawrence.

In: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Vol. 93, No. 6, 06.2014, p. 571-586.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{a41d890e8c7b4f3fb62d6edd2e29d70a,
title = "A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II: The meta-analyses",
abstract = "We appraised the methodology, execution and quality of the five published meta-analyses that are based on the five randomized controlled trials which compared cardiotocography (CTG)+ST analysis to cardiotocography. The meta-analyses contained errors, either created de novo in handling of original data or from a failure to recognize essential differences among the randomized controlled trials, particularly in their inclusion criteria and outcome parameters. No meta-analysis contained complete and relevant data from all five randomized controlled trials. We believe that one randomized controlled trial excluded in two of the meta-analyses should have been included, whereas one randomized controlled trial that was included in all meta-analyses, should have been excluded. After correction of the uncovered errors and exclusion of the randomized controlled trial that we deemed inappropriate, our new meta-analysis showed that CTG+ST monitoring significantly reduces the fetal scalp blood sampling usage (risk ratio 0.64; 95{\%} confidence interval 0.47-0.88), total operative delivery rate (0.93; 0.88-0.99) and metabolic acidosis rate (0.61; 0.41-0.91).",
keywords = "Cardiotocography, ST analysis, fetal surveillance, meta-analysis, metabolic acidosis, randomized controlled trial",
author = "Per Olofsson and Diogo Ayres-De-Campos and J{\"o}rg Kessler and Britta Tendal and Yli, {Branka M.} and Lawrence Devoe",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/aogs.12412",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "571--586",
journal = "Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-6349",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II

T2 - The meta-analyses

AU - Olofsson, Per

AU - Ayres-De-Campos, Diogo

AU - Kessler, Jörg

AU - Tendal, Britta

AU - Yli, Branka M.

AU - Devoe, Lawrence

PY - 2014/6

Y1 - 2014/6

N2 - We appraised the methodology, execution and quality of the five published meta-analyses that are based on the five randomized controlled trials which compared cardiotocography (CTG)+ST analysis to cardiotocography. The meta-analyses contained errors, either created de novo in handling of original data or from a failure to recognize essential differences among the randomized controlled trials, particularly in their inclusion criteria and outcome parameters. No meta-analysis contained complete and relevant data from all five randomized controlled trials. We believe that one randomized controlled trial excluded in two of the meta-analyses should have been included, whereas one randomized controlled trial that was included in all meta-analyses, should have been excluded. After correction of the uncovered errors and exclusion of the randomized controlled trial that we deemed inappropriate, our new meta-analysis showed that CTG+ST monitoring significantly reduces the fetal scalp blood sampling usage (risk ratio 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.88), total operative delivery rate (0.93; 0.88-0.99) and metabolic acidosis rate (0.61; 0.41-0.91).

AB - We appraised the methodology, execution and quality of the five published meta-analyses that are based on the five randomized controlled trials which compared cardiotocography (CTG)+ST analysis to cardiotocography. The meta-analyses contained errors, either created de novo in handling of original data or from a failure to recognize essential differences among the randomized controlled trials, particularly in their inclusion criteria and outcome parameters. No meta-analysis contained complete and relevant data from all five randomized controlled trials. We believe that one randomized controlled trial excluded in two of the meta-analyses should have been included, whereas one randomized controlled trial that was included in all meta-analyses, should have been excluded. After correction of the uncovered errors and exclusion of the randomized controlled trial that we deemed inappropriate, our new meta-analysis showed that CTG+ST monitoring significantly reduces the fetal scalp blood sampling usage (risk ratio 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.88), total operative delivery rate (0.93; 0.88-0.99) and metabolic acidosis rate (0.61; 0.41-0.91).

KW - Cardiotocography

KW - ST analysis

KW - fetal surveillance

KW - meta-analysis

KW - metabolic acidosis

KW - randomized controlled trial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901641480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901641480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/aogs.12412

DO - 10.1111/aogs.12412

M3 - Review article

C2 - 24797318

AN - SCOPUS:84901641480

VL - 93

SP - 571

EP - 586

JO - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-6349

IS - 6

ER -