A discrimination task used as a novel method of testing decision-making behavior following traumatic brain injury

Kris M. Martens, Cole Vonder Haar, Blake A. Hutsell, Michael R. Hoane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in a multitude of deficits following injury. Some of the most pervasive in humans are the changes that affect frontally-mediated cognitive functioning, such as decision making. The assessment of decision-making behavior in rodents has been extensively tested in the field of the experimental analysis of behavior. However, due to the narrow therapeutic window following TBI, time-intensive operant paradigms are rarely incorporated into the battery of tests traditionally used, the majority of which assess motor and sensory functioning. The cognitive measures that are used are frequently limited to memory and do not account for changes in decision-making behavior. The purpose of the present study was to develop a simplified discrimination task that can assess deficits in decision-making behavior in rodents. For the task, rats were required to dig in cocoa-scented sand (versus unscented sand) for a reinforcer. Rats were given 12 sessions per day until a criterion level of 80% accuracy for 3 days straight was reached. Once the criterion was achieved, cortical contusion injuries were induced (frontal, parietal, or sham). Following a recovery period, the rats were re-tested on cocoa versus unscented sand. Upon reaching criterion, a reversal discrimination was evaluated in which the reinforcer was placed in unscented sand. Finally, a novel scent discrimination (basil versus coffee with basil reinforced), and a reversal (coffee) were evaluated. The results indicated that the Dig task is a simple experimental preparation that can be used to assess deficits in decision-making behavior following TBI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2505-2512
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neurotrauma
Volume29
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 10 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Ocimum basilicum
Coffee
Rodentia
Wounds and Injuries
Discrimination (Psychology)
Traumatic Brain Injury
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • animal modeling
  • behavioral testing
  • cognitive assessment
  • traumatic brain injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

A discrimination task used as a novel method of testing decision-making behavior following traumatic brain injury. / Martens, Kris M.; Vonder Haar, Cole; Hutsell, Blake A.; Hoane, Michael R.

In: Journal of Neurotrauma, Vol. 29, No. 15, 10.10.2012, p. 2505-2512.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Martens, Kris M. ; Vonder Haar, Cole ; Hutsell, Blake A. ; Hoane, Michael R. / A discrimination task used as a novel method of testing decision-making behavior following traumatic brain injury. In: Journal of Neurotrauma. 2012 ; Vol. 29, No. 15. pp. 2505-2512.
@article{a643a8a119bd4e1baf226d0363676b99,
title = "A discrimination task used as a novel method of testing decision-making behavior following traumatic brain injury",
abstract = "Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in a multitude of deficits following injury. Some of the most pervasive in humans are the changes that affect frontally-mediated cognitive functioning, such as decision making. The assessment of decision-making behavior in rodents has been extensively tested in the field of the experimental analysis of behavior. However, due to the narrow therapeutic window following TBI, time-intensive operant paradigms are rarely incorporated into the battery of tests traditionally used, the majority of which assess motor and sensory functioning. The cognitive measures that are used are frequently limited to memory and do not account for changes in decision-making behavior. The purpose of the present study was to develop a simplified discrimination task that can assess deficits in decision-making behavior in rodents. For the task, rats were required to dig in cocoa-scented sand (versus unscented sand) for a reinforcer. Rats were given 12 sessions per day until a criterion level of 80{\%} accuracy for 3 days straight was reached. Once the criterion was achieved, cortical contusion injuries were induced (frontal, parietal, or sham). Following a recovery period, the rats were re-tested on cocoa versus unscented sand. Upon reaching criterion, a reversal discrimination was evaluated in which the reinforcer was placed in unscented sand. Finally, a novel scent discrimination (basil versus coffee with basil reinforced), and a reversal (coffee) were evaluated. The results indicated that the Dig task is a simple experimental preparation that can be used to assess deficits in decision-making behavior following TBI.",
keywords = "animal modeling, behavioral testing, cognitive assessment, traumatic brain injury",
author = "Martens, {Kris M.} and {Vonder Haar}, Cole and Hutsell, {Blake A.} and Hoane, {Michael R.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1089/neu.2012.2388",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "2505--2512",
journal = "Journal of Neurotrauma",
issn = "0897-7151",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A discrimination task used as a novel method of testing decision-making behavior following traumatic brain injury

AU - Martens, Kris M.

AU - Vonder Haar, Cole

AU - Hutsell, Blake A.

AU - Hoane, Michael R.

PY - 2012/10/10

Y1 - 2012/10/10

N2 - Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in a multitude of deficits following injury. Some of the most pervasive in humans are the changes that affect frontally-mediated cognitive functioning, such as decision making. The assessment of decision-making behavior in rodents has been extensively tested in the field of the experimental analysis of behavior. However, due to the narrow therapeutic window following TBI, time-intensive operant paradigms are rarely incorporated into the battery of tests traditionally used, the majority of which assess motor and sensory functioning. The cognitive measures that are used are frequently limited to memory and do not account for changes in decision-making behavior. The purpose of the present study was to develop a simplified discrimination task that can assess deficits in decision-making behavior in rodents. For the task, rats were required to dig in cocoa-scented sand (versus unscented sand) for a reinforcer. Rats were given 12 sessions per day until a criterion level of 80% accuracy for 3 days straight was reached. Once the criterion was achieved, cortical contusion injuries were induced (frontal, parietal, or sham). Following a recovery period, the rats were re-tested on cocoa versus unscented sand. Upon reaching criterion, a reversal discrimination was evaluated in which the reinforcer was placed in unscented sand. Finally, a novel scent discrimination (basil versus coffee with basil reinforced), and a reversal (coffee) were evaluated. The results indicated that the Dig task is a simple experimental preparation that can be used to assess deficits in decision-making behavior following TBI.

AB - Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in a multitude of deficits following injury. Some of the most pervasive in humans are the changes that affect frontally-mediated cognitive functioning, such as decision making. The assessment of decision-making behavior in rodents has been extensively tested in the field of the experimental analysis of behavior. However, due to the narrow therapeutic window following TBI, time-intensive operant paradigms are rarely incorporated into the battery of tests traditionally used, the majority of which assess motor and sensory functioning. The cognitive measures that are used are frequently limited to memory and do not account for changes in decision-making behavior. The purpose of the present study was to develop a simplified discrimination task that can assess deficits in decision-making behavior in rodents. For the task, rats were required to dig in cocoa-scented sand (versus unscented sand) for a reinforcer. Rats were given 12 sessions per day until a criterion level of 80% accuracy for 3 days straight was reached. Once the criterion was achieved, cortical contusion injuries were induced (frontal, parietal, or sham). Following a recovery period, the rats were re-tested on cocoa versus unscented sand. Upon reaching criterion, a reversal discrimination was evaluated in which the reinforcer was placed in unscented sand. Finally, a novel scent discrimination (basil versus coffee with basil reinforced), and a reversal (coffee) were evaluated. The results indicated that the Dig task is a simple experimental preparation that can be used to assess deficits in decision-making behavior following TBI.

KW - animal modeling

KW - behavioral testing

KW - cognitive assessment

KW - traumatic brain injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867530848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867530848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/neu.2012.2388

DO - 10.1089/neu.2012.2388

M3 - Article

C2 - 22924664

AN - SCOPUS:84867530848

VL - 29

SP - 2505

EP - 2512

JO - Journal of Neurotrauma

JF - Journal of Neurotrauma

SN - 0897-7151

IS - 15

ER -