A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception: Contributions from judgment and decision-making research

Ellen Peters, Kevin D. McCaul, Michael Stefanek, Wendy Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

71 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The likelihood judgments that people make about their risks for cancer have important implications. At the individual level, risk estimates guide protective actions, such as cancer screening. However, at the extremes, exaggerated risk judgments can also lead to anxiety that degrades quality of life or to aggressive self-protective actions that are unwarranted given the objective risks. At the policy level, risk judgments may serve as an indicator of societal perceptions of the "war" against cancer. Using risk judgments, the public expresses its belief about whether we are winning. Purpose: We present theoretical perspectives from judgment and decision making, illustrate how they can explain some of the existing empirical findings in the cancer risk literature, and describe additional predictions that have not yet been tested. Conclusions: Overall, we suggest that theories from the judgment and decision-making perspective offer a potentially powerful view for understanding and improving risk judgments for cancer and other diseases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-52
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 3 2006

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Research
Neoplasms
Heuristics
Early Detection of Cancer
Anxiety
Quality of Life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception : Contributions from judgment and decision-making research. / Peters, Ellen; McCaul, Kevin D.; Stefanek, Michael; Nelson, Wendy.

In: Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 1, 03.03.2006, p. 45-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Peters, Ellen ; McCaul, Kevin D. ; Stefanek, Michael ; Nelson, Wendy. / A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception : Contributions from judgment and decision-making research. In: Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 45-52.
@article{1b0d2b59867845d28ea26d4b04bcdcd4,
title = "A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception: Contributions from judgment and decision-making research",
abstract = "Background: The likelihood judgments that people make about their risks for cancer have important implications. At the individual level, risk estimates guide protective actions, such as cancer screening. However, at the extremes, exaggerated risk judgments can also lead to anxiety that degrades quality of life or to aggressive self-protective actions that are unwarranted given the objective risks. At the policy level, risk judgments may serve as an indicator of societal perceptions of the {"}war{"} against cancer. Using risk judgments, the public expresses its belief about whether we are winning. Purpose: We present theoretical perspectives from judgment and decision making, illustrate how they can explain some of the existing empirical findings in the cancer risk literature, and describe additional predictions that have not yet been tested. Conclusions: Overall, we suggest that theories from the judgment and decision-making perspective offer a potentially powerful view for understanding and improving risk judgments for cancer and other diseases.",
author = "Ellen Peters and McCaul, {Kevin D.} and Michael Stefanek and Wendy Nelson",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1207/s15324796abm3101_8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "45--52",
journal = "Annals of Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "0883-6612",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception

T2 - Contributions from judgment and decision-making research

AU - Peters, Ellen

AU - McCaul, Kevin D.

AU - Stefanek, Michael

AU - Nelson, Wendy

PY - 2006/3/3

Y1 - 2006/3/3

N2 - Background: The likelihood judgments that people make about their risks for cancer have important implications. At the individual level, risk estimates guide protective actions, such as cancer screening. However, at the extremes, exaggerated risk judgments can also lead to anxiety that degrades quality of life or to aggressive self-protective actions that are unwarranted given the objective risks. At the policy level, risk judgments may serve as an indicator of societal perceptions of the "war" against cancer. Using risk judgments, the public expresses its belief about whether we are winning. Purpose: We present theoretical perspectives from judgment and decision making, illustrate how they can explain some of the existing empirical findings in the cancer risk literature, and describe additional predictions that have not yet been tested. Conclusions: Overall, we suggest that theories from the judgment and decision-making perspective offer a potentially powerful view for understanding and improving risk judgments for cancer and other diseases.

AB - Background: The likelihood judgments that people make about their risks for cancer have important implications. At the individual level, risk estimates guide protective actions, such as cancer screening. However, at the extremes, exaggerated risk judgments can also lead to anxiety that degrades quality of life or to aggressive self-protective actions that are unwarranted given the objective risks. At the policy level, risk judgments may serve as an indicator of societal perceptions of the "war" against cancer. Using risk judgments, the public expresses its belief about whether we are winning. Purpose: We present theoretical perspectives from judgment and decision making, illustrate how they can explain some of the existing empirical findings in the cancer risk literature, and describe additional predictions that have not yet been tested. Conclusions: Overall, we suggest that theories from the judgment and decision-making perspective offer a potentially powerful view for understanding and improving risk judgments for cancer and other diseases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644534820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644534820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15324796abm3101_8

DO - 10.1207/s15324796abm3101_8

M3 - Review article

C2 - 16472038

AN - SCOPUS:33644534820

VL - 31

SP - 45

EP - 52

JO - Annals of Behavioral Medicine

JF - Annals of Behavioral Medicine

SN - 0883-6612

IS - 1

ER -