A model of health care provider decision making about HPV vaccination in adolescent males

Andreia B. Alexander, Candace Best, Nathan Stupiansky, Gregory D. Zimet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: In the U.S., HPV vaccination of adolescent males remains low, despite the recommendation for routine vaccination. Although research has highlighted that health care provider (HCP) recommendation is very influential in HPV vaccine uptake, research on this topic in the male population is lacking. Accordingly, we used a qualitative approach to identify HCP knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding adolescent male HPV vaccination, one year, after routine vaccination of adolescent males was recommended. Method: A total of 20 U.S. pediatric HCPs participated in 20-30. min interviews about knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding male HPV vaccination. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and, analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results: The providers had been in practice for 1-35 years, 75% were female, and 75% were White. Opinions on HPV vaccination were shaped by knowledge/perception of the risks and benefits of vaccination. Although all providers frequently offered HPV vaccine to male patients, the strength and content of the offer varied greatly. Vaccination opinions determined what issues were emphasized in the vaccine offer (e.g., stressing herd immunity, discussing prevention of genital warts), while adolescent age influenced if and how they pitched their vaccine offer (e.g., HPV as a STI). Most providers agreed with the ACIP recommendations, however, several expressed that providers' preexisting opinions might remain unchanged despite the recommendations. Consistent with the literature on determinants of HPV vaccination, providers believed that their own recommendation was a major factor in a family's decision to vaccinate. Barriers to vaccination included the "newness" and sexual nature of the vaccine, lack of insurance coverage, and the vaccine not being mandated. Conclusions: Providers' opinions about, and approaches to offering, HPV vaccination to males were highly variable. Interventions designed to improve male HPV vaccination should focus on helping providers to routinely recommend the vaccine to all of their eligible patients, both males and females.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4081-4086
Number of pages6
JournalVaccine
Volume33
Issue number33
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

health care workers
Health Personnel
decision making
Decision Making
Vaccination
vaccination
vaccines
Vaccines
Papillomavirus Vaccines
interviews
Herd Immunity
Interviews
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Condylomata Acuminata
warts
Adolescent Behavior
risk perception
Insurance Coverage
insurance
Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Health care provider
  • Human papillomavirus
  • Male
  • Qualitative research
  • Vaccine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Medicine
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)
  • veterinary(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

A model of health care provider decision making about HPV vaccination in adolescent males. / Alexander, Andreia B.; Best, Candace; Stupiansky, Nathan; Zimet, Gregory D.

In: Vaccine, Vol. 33, No. 33, 01.01.2015, p. 4081-4086.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alexander, Andreia B. ; Best, Candace ; Stupiansky, Nathan ; Zimet, Gregory D. / A model of health care provider decision making about HPV vaccination in adolescent males. In: Vaccine. 2015 ; Vol. 33, No. 33. pp. 4081-4086.
@article{13bcbd18d2a7437ca18079e89ee9eabd,
title = "A model of health care provider decision making about HPV vaccination in adolescent males",
abstract = "Introduction: In the U.S., HPV vaccination of adolescent males remains low, despite the recommendation for routine vaccination. Although research has highlighted that health care provider (HCP) recommendation is very influential in HPV vaccine uptake, research on this topic in the male population is lacking. Accordingly, we used a qualitative approach to identify HCP knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding adolescent male HPV vaccination, one year, after routine vaccination of adolescent males was recommended. Method: A total of 20 U.S. pediatric HCPs participated in 20-30. min interviews about knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding male HPV vaccination. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and, analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results: The providers had been in practice for 1-35 years, 75{\%} were female, and 75{\%} were White. Opinions on HPV vaccination were shaped by knowledge/perception of the risks and benefits of vaccination. Although all providers frequently offered HPV vaccine to male patients, the strength and content of the offer varied greatly. Vaccination opinions determined what issues were emphasized in the vaccine offer (e.g., stressing herd immunity, discussing prevention of genital warts), while adolescent age influenced if and how they pitched their vaccine offer (e.g., HPV as a STI). Most providers agreed with the ACIP recommendations, however, several expressed that providers' preexisting opinions might remain unchanged despite the recommendations. Consistent with the literature on determinants of HPV vaccination, providers believed that their own recommendation was a major factor in a family's decision to vaccinate. Barriers to vaccination included the {"}newness{"} and sexual nature of the vaccine, lack of insurance coverage, and the vaccine not being mandated. Conclusions: Providers' opinions about, and approaches to offering, HPV vaccination to males were highly variable. Interventions designed to improve male HPV vaccination should focus on helping providers to routinely recommend the vaccine to all of their eligible patients, both males and females.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Health care provider, Human papillomavirus, Male, Qualitative research, Vaccine",
author = "Alexander, {Andreia B.} and Candace Best and Nathan Stupiansky and Zimet, {Gregory D.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.085",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "4081--4086",
journal = "Vaccine",
issn = "0264-410X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "33",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A model of health care provider decision making about HPV vaccination in adolescent males

AU - Alexander, Andreia B.

AU - Best, Candace

AU - Stupiansky, Nathan

AU - Zimet, Gregory D.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Introduction: In the U.S., HPV vaccination of adolescent males remains low, despite the recommendation for routine vaccination. Although research has highlighted that health care provider (HCP) recommendation is very influential in HPV vaccine uptake, research on this topic in the male population is lacking. Accordingly, we used a qualitative approach to identify HCP knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding adolescent male HPV vaccination, one year, after routine vaccination of adolescent males was recommended. Method: A total of 20 U.S. pediatric HCPs participated in 20-30. min interviews about knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding male HPV vaccination. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and, analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results: The providers had been in practice for 1-35 years, 75% were female, and 75% were White. Opinions on HPV vaccination were shaped by knowledge/perception of the risks and benefits of vaccination. Although all providers frequently offered HPV vaccine to male patients, the strength and content of the offer varied greatly. Vaccination opinions determined what issues were emphasized in the vaccine offer (e.g., stressing herd immunity, discussing prevention of genital warts), while adolescent age influenced if and how they pitched their vaccine offer (e.g., HPV as a STI). Most providers agreed with the ACIP recommendations, however, several expressed that providers' preexisting opinions might remain unchanged despite the recommendations. Consistent with the literature on determinants of HPV vaccination, providers believed that their own recommendation was a major factor in a family's decision to vaccinate. Barriers to vaccination included the "newness" and sexual nature of the vaccine, lack of insurance coverage, and the vaccine not being mandated. Conclusions: Providers' opinions about, and approaches to offering, HPV vaccination to males were highly variable. Interventions designed to improve male HPV vaccination should focus on helping providers to routinely recommend the vaccine to all of their eligible patients, both males and females.

AB - Introduction: In the U.S., HPV vaccination of adolescent males remains low, despite the recommendation for routine vaccination. Although research has highlighted that health care provider (HCP) recommendation is very influential in HPV vaccine uptake, research on this topic in the male population is lacking. Accordingly, we used a qualitative approach to identify HCP knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding adolescent male HPV vaccination, one year, after routine vaccination of adolescent males was recommended. Method: A total of 20 U.S. pediatric HCPs participated in 20-30. min interviews about knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding male HPV vaccination. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and, analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results: The providers had been in practice for 1-35 years, 75% were female, and 75% were White. Opinions on HPV vaccination were shaped by knowledge/perception of the risks and benefits of vaccination. Although all providers frequently offered HPV vaccine to male patients, the strength and content of the offer varied greatly. Vaccination opinions determined what issues were emphasized in the vaccine offer (e.g., stressing herd immunity, discussing prevention of genital warts), while adolescent age influenced if and how they pitched their vaccine offer (e.g., HPV as a STI). Most providers agreed with the ACIP recommendations, however, several expressed that providers' preexisting opinions might remain unchanged despite the recommendations. Consistent with the literature on determinants of HPV vaccination, providers believed that their own recommendation was a major factor in a family's decision to vaccinate. Barriers to vaccination included the "newness" and sexual nature of the vaccine, lack of insurance coverage, and the vaccine not being mandated. Conclusions: Providers' opinions about, and approaches to offering, HPV vaccination to males were highly variable. Interventions designed to improve male HPV vaccination should focus on helping providers to routinely recommend the vaccine to all of their eligible patients, both males and females.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Health care provider

KW - Human papillomavirus

KW - Male

KW - Qualitative research

KW - Vaccine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952639929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952639929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.085

DO - 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.085

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 4081

EP - 4086

JO - Vaccine

JF - Vaccine

SN - 0264-410X

IS - 33

ER -