A novel alternative for removal of the AxiaLif (TranS1) in the setting of pseudarthrosis of L5-S1

John Glenden DeVine, David Gloystein, Niten Singh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive spine surgery continues to be a growing trend for orthopedic and neurosurgical spinal interventions. Technological advances have allowed surgeons to perform L5-S1 fusions via posterolateral or anterior approaches through less invasive techniques. The development of the AxiaLIF system (TranS1, Inc., Wilmington, NC) is predicated on the application of minimally invasive techniques to attain fusion at L5-S1 and L4-S1 levels with a novel corridor of approach, described as the presacral "safe zone.". Purpose: The authors describe an alternative approach for removing a L5-S1 transsacral implant that was placed through a percutaneous paracoccygeal approach using the presacral safe zone. The purpose of this technical note is to demonstrate that use of the previous percutaneous presacral tract, as recommended by the manufacturer, is not mandatory. In cases of anterior pseudarthrosis following this device, a paramedian retroperitoneal approach to L5-S1 not only allows for adequate visualization for revision but also provides adequate and safe caudal exposure over the sacral promontory to remove the implant through its previous osseous path. Study design/setting: This technical note highlights the concerns for revision of the AxiaLif (TranS1) screw through the presacral scarred tract. Methods: The AxiaLif (TranS1), used in this case is an alternative method to anterior, posterior, or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Removal of this implant for pseudarthrosis was performed through a paramedian retroperitoneal approach with caudal extension. After anterior discectomy, the AxiaLif screw was removed via manipulation through the disc space and delivered through the sacrum. This was followed by complete discectomy and bone grafting of the voids left in the L5 and sacral vertebral bodies. Standard anterior lumbar interbody reconstruction was then performed using a polyetheretherketone implant followed by revision of the pedicle screw construct posteriorly. Results: Preoperative symptoms were resolved in the immediate postoperative period secondary to the immediate stability afforded by the revision of the loose implants. Fusion was achieved within 6 months and confirmed with fine-cut computed tomography images. Conclusion: This novel technique of avoiding a scarred down presacral corridor in the hands of surgeons unfamiliar with the technique allows for safe removal of the AxiaLif (TranS1) implant coupled with revision to anterior lumbar interbody fusion through the same incision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)910-915
Number of pages6
JournalSpine Journal
Volume9
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Diskectomy
Pseudarthrosis
Sacrum
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Bone Transplantation
Postoperative Period
Orthopedics
Spine
Tomography
Equipment and Supplies
Surgeons
Pedicle Screws
polyetheretherketone

Keywords

  • Anterior lumbar interbody fusion
  • AxiaLif TranS1
  • Minimally invasive spine surgery
  • Pseudarthrosis
  • Revision spine surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

A novel alternative for removal of the AxiaLif (TranS1) in the setting of pseudarthrosis of L5-S1. / DeVine, John Glenden; Gloystein, David; Singh, Niten.

In: Spine Journal, Vol. 9, No. 11, 01.11.2009, p. 910-915.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{59bc76c7d6fb44a4817c0025d448c4af,
title = "A novel alternative for removal of the AxiaLif (TranS1) in the setting of pseudarthrosis of L5-S1",
abstract = "Background: Minimally invasive spine surgery continues to be a growing trend for orthopedic and neurosurgical spinal interventions. Technological advances have allowed surgeons to perform L5-S1 fusions via posterolateral or anterior approaches through less invasive techniques. The development of the AxiaLIF system (TranS1, Inc., Wilmington, NC) is predicated on the application of minimally invasive techniques to attain fusion at L5-S1 and L4-S1 levels with a novel corridor of approach, described as the presacral {"}safe zone.{"}. Purpose: The authors describe an alternative approach for removing a L5-S1 transsacral implant that was placed through a percutaneous paracoccygeal approach using the presacral safe zone. The purpose of this technical note is to demonstrate that use of the previous percutaneous presacral tract, as recommended by the manufacturer, is not mandatory. In cases of anterior pseudarthrosis following this device, a paramedian retroperitoneal approach to L5-S1 not only allows for adequate visualization for revision but also provides adequate and safe caudal exposure over the sacral promontory to remove the implant through its previous osseous path. Study design/setting: This technical note highlights the concerns for revision of the AxiaLif (TranS1) screw through the presacral scarred tract. Methods: The AxiaLif (TranS1), used in this case is an alternative method to anterior, posterior, or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Removal of this implant for pseudarthrosis was performed through a paramedian retroperitoneal approach with caudal extension. After anterior discectomy, the AxiaLif screw was removed via manipulation through the disc space and delivered through the sacrum. This was followed by complete discectomy and bone grafting of the voids left in the L5 and sacral vertebral bodies. Standard anterior lumbar interbody reconstruction was then performed using a polyetheretherketone implant followed by revision of the pedicle screw construct posteriorly. Results: Preoperative symptoms were resolved in the immediate postoperative period secondary to the immediate stability afforded by the revision of the loose implants. Fusion was achieved within 6 months and confirmed with fine-cut computed tomography images. Conclusion: This novel technique of avoiding a scarred down presacral corridor in the hands of surgeons unfamiliar with the technique allows for safe removal of the AxiaLif (TranS1) implant coupled with revision to anterior lumbar interbody fusion through the same incision.",
keywords = "Anterior lumbar interbody fusion, AxiaLif TranS1, Minimally invasive spine surgery, Pseudarthrosis, Revision spine surgery",
author = "DeVine, {John Glenden} and David Gloystein and Niten Singh",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.459",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "910--915",
journal = "Spine Journal",
issn = "1529-9430",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A novel alternative for removal of the AxiaLif (TranS1) in the setting of pseudarthrosis of L5-S1

AU - DeVine, John Glenden

AU - Gloystein, David

AU - Singh, Niten

PY - 2009/11/1

Y1 - 2009/11/1

N2 - Background: Minimally invasive spine surgery continues to be a growing trend for orthopedic and neurosurgical spinal interventions. Technological advances have allowed surgeons to perform L5-S1 fusions via posterolateral or anterior approaches through less invasive techniques. The development of the AxiaLIF system (TranS1, Inc., Wilmington, NC) is predicated on the application of minimally invasive techniques to attain fusion at L5-S1 and L4-S1 levels with a novel corridor of approach, described as the presacral "safe zone.". Purpose: The authors describe an alternative approach for removing a L5-S1 transsacral implant that was placed through a percutaneous paracoccygeal approach using the presacral safe zone. The purpose of this technical note is to demonstrate that use of the previous percutaneous presacral tract, as recommended by the manufacturer, is not mandatory. In cases of anterior pseudarthrosis following this device, a paramedian retroperitoneal approach to L5-S1 not only allows for adequate visualization for revision but also provides adequate and safe caudal exposure over the sacral promontory to remove the implant through its previous osseous path. Study design/setting: This technical note highlights the concerns for revision of the AxiaLif (TranS1) screw through the presacral scarred tract. Methods: The AxiaLif (TranS1), used in this case is an alternative method to anterior, posterior, or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Removal of this implant for pseudarthrosis was performed through a paramedian retroperitoneal approach with caudal extension. After anterior discectomy, the AxiaLif screw was removed via manipulation through the disc space and delivered through the sacrum. This was followed by complete discectomy and bone grafting of the voids left in the L5 and sacral vertebral bodies. Standard anterior lumbar interbody reconstruction was then performed using a polyetheretherketone implant followed by revision of the pedicle screw construct posteriorly. Results: Preoperative symptoms were resolved in the immediate postoperative period secondary to the immediate stability afforded by the revision of the loose implants. Fusion was achieved within 6 months and confirmed with fine-cut computed tomography images. Conclusion: This novel technique of avoiding a scarred down presacral corridor in the hands of surgeons unfamiliar with the technique allows for safe removal of the AxiaLif (TranS1) implant coupled with revision to anterior lumbar interbody fusion through the same incision.

AB - Background: Minimally invasive spine surgery continues to be a growing trend for orthopedic and neurosurgical spinal interventions. Technological advances have allowed surgeons to perform L5-S1 fusions via posterolateral or anterior approaches through less invasive techniques. The development of the AxiaLIF system (TranS1, Inc., Wilmington, NC) is predicated on the application of minimally invasive techniques to attain fusion at L5-S1 and L4-S1 levels with a novel corridor of approach, described as the presacral "safe zone.". Purpose: The authors describe an alternative approach for removing a L5-S1 transsacral implant that was placed through a percutaneous paracoccygeal approach using the presacral safe zone. The purpose of this technical note is to demonstrate that use of the previous percutaneous presacral tract, as recommended by the manufacturer, is not mandatory. In cases of anterior pseudarthrosis following this device, a paramedian retroperitoneal approach to L5-S1 not only allows for adequate visualization for revision but also provides adequate and safe caudal exposure over the sacral promontory to remove the implant through its previous osseous path. Study design/setting: This technical note highlights the concerns for revision of the AxiaLif (TranS1) screw through the presacral scarred tract. Methods: The AxiaLif (TranS1), used in this case is an alternative method to anterior, posterior, or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Removal of this implant for pseudarthrosis was performed through a paramedian retroperitoneal approach with caudal extension. After anterior discectomy, the AxiaLif screw was removed via manipulation through the disc space and delivered through the sacrum. This was followed by complete discectomy and bone grafting of the voids left in the L5 and sacral vertebral bodies. Standard anterior lumbar interbody reconstruction was then performed using a polyetheretherketone implant followed by revision of the pedicle screw construct posteriorly. Results: Preoperative symptoms were resolved in the immediate postoperative period secondary to the immediate stability afforded by the revision of the loose implants. Fusion was achieved within 6 months and confirmed with fine-cut computed tomography images. Conclusion: This novel technique of avoiding a scarred down presacral corridor in the hands of surgeons unfamiliar with the technique allows for safe removal of the AxiaLif (TranS1) implant coupled with revision to anterior lumbar interbody fusion through the same incision.

KW - Anterior lumbar interbody fusion

KW - AxiaLif TranS1

KW - Minimally invasive spine surgery

KW - Pseudarthrosis

KW - Revision spine surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71049153367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71049153367&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.459

DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.459

M3 - Article

C2 - 19850232

AN - SCOPUS:71049153367

VL - 9

SP - 910

EP - 915

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

SN - 1529-9430

IS - 11

ER -