A second look at the utility of serial routine repeat computed tomographic scans in patients with traumatic brain injury Podium presentation at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Southwest Surgical Congress from 26 to 29 April, 2015 at Monterey, CA.

Ansab A. Haider, Peter Rhee, Tahereh Orouji, Narong Kulvatunyou, Tania Hassanzadeh, Andrew Tang, Adil Farman, Terence OKeeffe, Rifat Latifi, Bellal Joseph

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The practice of a routine repeat head computed tomographic scans in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is under question. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of a more than 1 repeat head computed tomography (M1CT) scans in patients with TBI. Methods We performed a 3-year analysis of a prospectively collected database of all TBI patients presenting to our level I trauma center. Patients who received M1CT scans were included. Findings and reason (without neurologic decline vs after neurologic decline) for M1CT were recorded. Primary outcome measure was neurosurgical intervention. Results A total of 296 patients that underwent M1CT were included. Of those, 291 patients (98.6%) had M1CT without a neurologic decline, and neurosurgical intervention was performed in 1 patient (.3%) who was inexaminable (Glasgow coma scale score = 6). The remaining (n = 5) had M1CT due to a neurologic decline; 4 patients (80%) of the 5 had worsening of ICH; and neurosurgical intervention was performed in 3 (75%) of the 4 patients. Conclusions The practice of multiple repeat head computed tomographic scans should be limited to inexaminable patients or patients with neurological deterioration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1088-1094
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume210
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nervous System
Head
Traumatic Brain Injury
Glasgow Coma Scale
Trauma Centers
Tomography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases

Keywords

  • More than 1 repeat scans
  • Neurologic decline
  • Neurosurgical intervention
  • Radiological progression
  • Serial CT scans
  • Traumatic brain injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A second look at the utility of serial routine repeat computed tomographic scans in patients with traumatic brain injury Podium presentation at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Southwest Surgical Congress from 26 to 29 April, 2015 at Monterey, CA. / Haider, Ansab A.; Rhee, Peter; Orouji, Tahereh; Kulvatunyou, Narong; Hassanzadeh, Tania; Tang, Andrew; Farman, Adil; OKeeffe, Terence; Latifi, Rifat; Joseph, Bellal.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 210, No. 6, 01.12.2015, p. 1088-1094.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Haider, Ansab A. ; Rhee, Peter ; Orouji, Tahereh ; Kulvatunyou, Narong ; Hassanzadeh, Tania ; Tang, Andrew ; Farman, Adil ; OKeeffe, Terence ; Latifi, Rifat ; Joseph, Bellal. / A second look at the utility of serial routine repeat computed tomographic scans in patients with traumatic brain injury Podium presentation at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Southwest Surgical Congress from 26 to 29 April, 2015 at Monterey, CA. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 210, No. 6. pp. 1088-1094.
@article{dd97db7c16c844c9b0c8ff12b3aa2527,
title = "A second look at the utility of serial routine repeat computed tomographic scans in patients with traumatic brain injury Podium presentation at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Southwest Surgical Congress from 26 to 29 April, 2015 at Monterey, CA.",
abstract = "Background The practice of a routine repeat head computed tomographic scans in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is under question. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of a more than 1 repeat head computed tomography (M1CT) scans in patients with TBI. Methods We performed a 3-year analysis of a prospectively collected database of all TBI patients presenting to our level I trauma center. Patients who received M1CT scans were included. Findings and reason (without neurologic decline vs after neurologic decline) for M1CT were recorded. Primary outcome measure was neurosurgical intervention. Results A total of 296 patients that underwent M1CT were included. Of those, 291 patients (98.6{\%}) had M1CT without a neurologic decline, and neurosurgical intervention was performed in 1 patient (.3{\%}) who was inexaminable (Glasgow coma scale score = 6). The remaining (n = 5) had M1CT due to a neurologic decline; 4 patients (80{\%}) of the 5 had worsening of ICH; and neurosurgical intervention was performed in 3 (75{\%}) of the 4 patients. Conclusions The practice of multiple repeat head computed tomographic scans should be limited to inexaminable patients or patients with neurological deterioration.",
keywords = "More than 1 repeat scans, Neurologic decline, Neurosurgical intervention, Radiological progression, Serial CT scans, Traumatic brain injury",
author = "Haider, {Ansab A.} and Peter Rhee and Tahereh Orouji and Narong Kulvatunyou and Tania Hassanzadeh and Andrew Tang and Adil Farman and Terence OKeeffe and Rifat Latifi and Bellal Joseph",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "210",
pages = "1088--1094",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A second look at the utility of serial routine repeat computed tomographic scans in patients with traumatic brain injury Podium presentation at the 67th Annual Meeting of the Southwest Surgical Congress from 26 to 29 April, 2015 at Monterey, CA.

AU - Haider, Ansab A.

AU - Rhee, Peter

AU - Orouji, Tahereh

AU - Kulvatunyou, Narong

AU - Hassanzadeh, Tania

AU - Tang, Andrew

AU - Farman, Adil

AU - OKeeffe, Terence

AU - Latifi, Rifat

AU - Joseph, Bellal

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Background The practice of a routine repeat head computed tomographic scans in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is under question. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of a more than 1 repeat head computed tomography (M1CT) scans in patients with TBI. Methods We performed a 3-year analysis of a prospectively collected database of all TBI patients presenting to our level I trauma center. Patients who received M1CT scans were included. Findings and reason (without neurologic decline vs after neurologic decline) for M1CT were recorded. Primary outcome measure was neurosurgical intervention. Results A total of 296 patients that underwent M1CT were included. Of those, 291 patients (98.6%) had M1CT without a neurologic decline, and neurosurgical intervention was performed in 1 patient (.3%) who was inexaminable (Glasgow coma scale score = 6). The remaining (n = 5) had M1CT due to a neurologic decline; 4 patients (80%) of the 5 had worsening of ICH; and neurosurgical intervention was performed in 3 (75%) of the 4 patients. Conclusions The practice of multiple repeat head computed tomographic scans should be limited to inexaminable patients or patients with neurological deterioration.

AB - Background The practice of a routine repeat head computed tomographic scans in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is under question. The aim of our study was to evaluate the utility of a more than 1 repeat head computed tomography (M1CT) scans in patients with TBI. Methods We performed a 3-year analysis of a prospectively collected database of all TBI patients presenting to our level I trauma center. Patients who received M1CT scans were included. Findings and reason (without neurologic decline vs after neurologic decline) for M1CT were recorded. Primary outcome measure was neurosurgical intervention. Results A total of 296 patients that underwent M1CT were included. Of those, 291 patients (98.6%) had M1CT without a neurologic decline, and neurosurgical intervention was performed in 1 patient (.3%) who was inexaminable (Glasgow coma scale score = 6). The remaining (n = 5) had M1CT due to a neurologic decline; 4 patients (80%) of the 5 had worsening of ICH; and neurosurgical intervention was performed in 3 (75%) of the 4 patients. Conclusions The practice of multiple repeat head computed tomographic scans should be limited to inexaminable patients or patients with neurological deterioration.

KW - More than 1 repeat scans

KW - Neurologic decline

KW - Neurosurgical intervention

KW - Radiological progression

KW - Serial CT scans

KW - Traumatic brain injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955464214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955464214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.004

M3 - Article

VL - 210

SP - 1088

EP - 1094

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 6

ER -