A simple, assumption-free, and clinically interpretable approach for analysis of modified Rankin outcomes

George Howard, Jennifer L Waller, Jenifer H. Voeks, Virginia J. Howard, Edward C. Jauch, Kennedy R. Lees, Fenwick T Nichols, Volker W. Rahlfs, David C Hess

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE-: There is debate regarding the approach for analysis of modified Rankin scale scores, the most common functional outcome scale used in acute stroke trials. METHODS-: We propose to use tests to assess treatment differences addressing the metric, "if a patient is chosen at random from each treatment group and if they have different outcomes, what is the chance the patient who received the investigational treatment will have a better outcome than will the patient receiving the standard treatment?" This approach has an associated statement of treatment efficacy easily understood by patients and clinicians, and leads to statistical testing of treatment differences by tests closely related to the Mann-Whitney U test (Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test), which can be tested precisely by permutation tests (randomization tests). RESULTS-: We show that a permutation test is as powerful as are other approaches assessing ordinal outcomes of the modified Rankin scores, and we provide data from several examples contrasting alternative approaches. DISCUSSION-: Whereas many approaches to analysis of modified Rankin scores outcomes have generally similar statistical performance, this proposed approach: captures information from the ordinal scale, provides a powerful clinical interpretation understood by both patients and clinicians, has power at least equivalent to other ordinal approaches, avoids assumptions in the parameterization, and provides an interpretable parameter based on the same foundation as the calculation of the probability value.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)664-669
Number of pages6
JournalStroke
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2012

Fingerprint

Nonparametric Statistics
Investigational Therapies
Therapeutics
Random Allocation
Stroke

Keywords

  • modified Rankin score
  • ordinal analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

A simple, assumption-free, and clinically interpretable approach for analysis of modified Rankin outcomes. / Howard, George; Waller, Jennifer L; Voeks, Jenifer H.; Howard, Virginia J.; Jauch, Edward C.; Lees, Kennedy R.; Nichols, Fenwick T; Rahlfs, Volker W.; Hess, David C.

In: Stroke, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.03.2012, p. 664-669.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Howard, George ; Waller, Jennifer L ; Voeks, Jenifer H. ; Howard, Virginia J. ; Jauch, Edward C. ; Lees, Kennedy R. ; Nichols, Fenwick T ; Rahlfs, Volker W. ; Hess, David C. / A simple, assumption-free, and clinically interpretable approach for analysis of modified Rankin outcomes. In: Stroke. 2012 ; Vol. 43, No. 3. pp. 664-669.
@article{d0a6e36809e940a09c8a4bd0ffd71ba6,
title = "A simple, assumption-free, and clinically interpretable approach for analysis of modified Rankin outcomes",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE-: There is debate regarding the approach for analysis of modified Rankin scale scores, the most common functional outcome scale used in acute stroke trials. METHODS-: We propose to use tests to assess treatment differences addressing the metric, {"}if a patient is chosen at random from each treatment group and if they have different outcomes, what is the chance the patient who received the investigational treatment will have a better outcome than will the patient receiving the standard treatment?{"} This approach has an associated statement of treatment efficacy easily understood by patients and clinicians, and leads to statistical testing of treatment differences by tests closely related to the Mann-Whitney U test (Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test), which can be tested precisely by permutation tests (randomization tests). RESULTS-: We show that a permutation test is as powerful as are other approaches assessing ordinal outcomes of the modified Rankin scores, and we provide data from several examples contrasting alternative approaches. DISCUSSION-: Whereas many approaches to analysis of modified Rankin scores outcomes have generally similar statistical performance, this proposed approach: captures information from the ordinal scale, provides a powerful clinical interpretation understood by both patients and clinicians, has power at least equivalent to other ordinal approaches, avoids assumptions in the parameterization, and provides an interpretable parameter based on the same foundation as the calculation of the probability value.",
keywords = "modified Rankin score, ordinal analysis",
author = "George Howard and Waller, {Jennifer L} and Voeks, {Jenifer H.} and Howard, {Virginia J.} and Jauch, {Edward C.} and Lees, {Kennedy R.} and Nichols, {Fenwick T} and Rahlfs, {Volker W.} and Hess, {David C}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.632935",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "664--669",
journal = "Stroke",
issn = "0039-2499",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A simple, assumption-free, and clinically interpretable approach for analysis of modified Rankin outcomes

AU - Howard, George

AU - Waller, Jennifer L

AU - Voeks, Jenifer H.

AU - Howard, Virginia J.

AU - Jauch, Edward C.

AU - Lees, Kennedy R.

AU - Nichols, Fenwick T

AU - Rahlfs, Volker W.

AU - Hess, David C

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE-: There is debate regarding the approach for analysis of modified Rankin scale scores, the most common functional outcome scale used in acute stroke trials. METHODS-: We propose to use tests to assess treatment differences addressing the metric, "if a patient is chosen at random from each treatment group and if they have different outcomes, what is the chance the patient who received the investigational treatment will have a better outcome than will the patient receiving the standard treatment?" This approach has an associated statement of treatment efficacy easily understood by patients and clinicians, and leads to statistical testing of treatment differences by tests closely related to the Mann-Whitney U test (Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test), which can be tested precisely by permutation tests (randomization tests). RESULTS-: We show that a permutation test is as powerful as are other approaches assessing ordinal outcomes of the modified Rankin scores, and we provide data from several examples contrasting alternative approaches. DISCUSSION-: Whereas many approaches to analysis of modified Rankin scores outcomes have generally similar statistical performance, this proposed approach: captures information from the ordinal scale, provides a powerful clinical interpretation understood by both patients and clinicians, has power at least equivalent to other ordinal approaches, avoids assumptions in the parameterization, and provides an interpretable parameter based on the same foundation as the calculation of the probability value.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE-: There is debate regarding the approach for analysis of modified Rankin scale scores, the most common functional outcome scale used in acute stroke trials. METHODS-: We propose to use tests to assess treatment differences addressing the metric, "if a patient is chosen at random from each treatment group and if they have different outcomes, what is the chance the patient who received the investigational treatment will have a better outcome than will the patient receiving the standard treatment?" This approach has an associated statement of treatment efficacy easily understood by patients and clinicians, and leads to statistical testing of treatment differences by tests closely related to the Mann-Whitney U test (Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test), which can be tested precisely by permutation tests (randomization tests). RESULTS-: We show that a permutation test is as powerful as are other approaches assessing ordinal outcomes of the modified Rankin scores, and we provide data from several examples contrasting alternative approaches. DISCUSSION-: Whereas many approaches to analysis of modified Rankin scores outcomes have generally similar statistical performance, this proposed approach: captures information from the ordinal scale, provides a powerful clinical interpretation understood by both patients and clinicians, has power at least equivalent to other ordinal approaches, avoids assumptions in the parameterization, and provides an interpretable parameter based on the same foundation as the calculation of the probability value.

KW - modified Rankin score

KW - ordinal analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857652262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857652262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.632935

DO - 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.632935

M3 - Article

C2 - 22343650

AN - SCOPUS:84857652262

VL - 43

SP - 664

EP - 669

JO - Stroke

JF - Stroke

SN - 0039-2499

IS - 3

ER -